How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction

被引:0
|
作者
John E. Marsh
Tom A. Campbell
François Vachon
Paul J. Taylor
Robert W. Hughes
机构
[1] University of Central Lancashire,School of Psychology
[2] University of Gävle,Department of Building, Energy, and Environmental Engineering
[3] Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences,Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway
[4] Tampere University,undefined
[5] Université Laval,undefined
[6] University of London,undefined
来源
关键词
Selective attention; Cognitive control; Auditory distraction; Attentional capture; Interference by process;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Classically, attentional selectivity has been conceptualized as a passive by-product of capacity limits on stimulus processing. Here, we examine the role of more active cognitive control processes in attentional selectivity, focusing on how distraction from task-irrelevant sound is modulated by levels of task engagement in a visually presented short-term memory task. Task engagement was varied by manipulating the load involved in the encoding of the (visually presented) to-be-remembered items. Using a list of Navon letters (where a large letter is composed of smaller, different-identity letters), participants were oriented to attend and serially recall the list of large letters (low encoding load) or to attend and serially recall the list of small letters (high encoding load). Attentional capture by a single deviant noise burst within a task-irrelevant tone sequence (the deviation effect) was eliminated under high encoding load (Experiment 1). However, distraction from a continuously changing sequence of tones (the changing-state effect) was immune to the influence of load (Experiment 2). This dissociation in the amenability of the deviation effect and the changing-state effect to cognitive control supports a duplex-mechanism over a unitary-mechanism account of auditory distraction in which the deviation effect is due to attentional capture whereas the changing-state effect reflects direct interference between the processing of the sound and processes involved in the focal task. That the changing-state effect survives high encoding load also goes against an alternative explanation of the attenuation of the deviation effect under high load in terms of the depletion of a limited perceptual resource that would result in diminished auditory processing.
引用
收藏
页码:350 / 362
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction
    Marsh, John E.
    Campbell, Tom A.
    Vachon, Francois
    Taylor, Paul J.
    Hughes, Robert W.
    [J]. ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2020, 82 (01) : 350 - 362
  • [2] Neuronal effects of auditory distraction on visual attention
    Smucny, Jason
    Rojas, Donald C.
    Eichman, Lindsay C.
    Tregellas, Jason R.
    [J]. BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2013, 81 (02) : 263 - 270
  • [3] Task difficulty modulates voluntary attention allocation, but not distraction in an auditory distraction paradigm
    Volosin, Marta
    Horvath, Janos
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH, 2020, 1727
  • [4] Neural Effects of Auditory Distraction on Visual Attention in Schizophrenia
    Smucny, Jason
    Rojas, Donald C.
    Eichman, Lindsay C.
    Tregellas, Jason R.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (04):
  • [5] Auditory and Visual Distraction
    Jerger, James
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2009, 20 (09) : 528 - 528
  • [6] Attention modulates earliest responses in the primary auditory and visual cortices
    Poghosyan, Vahe
    Ioannides, Andreas A.
    [J]. NEURON, 2008, 58 (05) : 802 - 813
  • [7] Crossmodal effects of attention: Visual load modulates processing of visual and auditory distractors
    Parks, Nathan A.
    Hilimire, Matthew R.
    Corballis, Paul M.
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 44 : S78 - S78
  • [8] A comparison of auditory and visual distraction
    Berti, S
    Schröger, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 15 (01) : 64 - 64
  • [9] AUDITORY AND VISUAL DISTRACTION IN HIPPOCAMPECTOMIZED RATS
    RIDDELL, WI
    ROTHBLAT, LA
    WILSON, WA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1969, 67 (2P1): : 216 - &
  • [10] Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention
    Michel Failing
    Jan Theeuwes
    [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2018, 25 : 514 - 538