Awkward states and regional organisations: The United Kingdom and Australia compared

被引:0
|
作者
Philomena Murray
Alex Warleigh-Lack
Baogang He
机构
[1] School of Social and Political Sciences,
[2] The University of Melbourne,undefined
[3] School of Politics,undefined
[4] University of Surrey,undefined
[5] School of Humanities and Social Sciences,undefined
[6] Nanyang Technological University,undefined
来源
关键词
regionalism; regional integration; awkward partners; European Union; Asia Pacific;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Both the United Kingdom and Australia have been studied by specialists in each region rather than by comparativists. This article seeks to fill this gap by examining the regional ‘awkwardness’ of the United Kingdom and Australia comparatively. Australia and Britain are ‘awkward’ states in their respective regions – Asia and Europe. This is clear in their approaches to institutions, economic policy, security and identity. We examine comparatively the role of power, institutions, economy, domestic politics and culture to see which mix best accounts for the awkward status of these two states. Through this comparison, this article demonstrates that the so-called ‘uniqueness’ of the United Kingdom in regionalism literature is in fact a nearly ‘universal’ phenomenon, insofar as many global regions include awkward states.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 300
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条