Fragmentation transitions in a coevolving nonlinear voter model

被引:0
|
作者
Byungjoon Min
Maxi San Miguel
机构
[1] IFISC,
[2] Instituto de Física Interdisciplinar y Sistemas Complejos (CSIC-UIB),undefined
[3] Campus Universitat Illes Balears,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We study a coevolving nonlinear voter model describing the coupled evolution of the states of the nodes and the network topology. Nonlinearity of the interaction is measured by a parameter q. The network topology changes by rewiring links at a rate p. By analytical and numerical analysis we obtain a phase diagram in p,q parameter space with three different phases: Dynamically active coexistence phase in a single component network, absorbing consensus phase in a single component network, and absorbing phase in a fragmented network. For finite systems the active phase has a lifetime that grows exponentially with system size, at variance with the similar phase for the linear voter model that has a lifetime proportional to system size. We find three transition lines that meet at the point of the fragmentation transition of the linear voter model. A first transition line corresponds to a continuous absorbing transition between the active and fragmented phases. The other two transition lines are discontinuous transitions fundamentally different from the transition of the linear voter model. One is a fragmentation transition between the consensus and fragmented phases, and the other is an absorbing transition in a single component network between the active and consensus phases.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fragmentation transitions in a coevolving nonlinear voter model
    Min, Byungjoon
    San Miguel, Maxi
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [2] Coevolving nonlinear voter model with triadic closure
    Raducha, Tomasz
    Min, Byungjoon
    San Miguel, Maxi
    [J]. EPL, 2018, 124 (03)
  • [3] Multiopinion coevolving voter model with infinitely many phase transitions
    Shi, Feng
    Mucha, Peter J.
    Durrett, Richard
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2013, 88 (06):
  • [4] Spontaneous symmetry breaking of active phase in coevolving nonlinear voter model
    Jedrzejewski, Arkadiusz
    Toruniewska, Joanna
    Suchecki, Krzysztof
    Zaikin, Oleg
    Holyst, Janusz A.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2020, 102 (04)
  • [5] Transitivity reinforcement in the coevolving voter model
    Malik, Nishant
    Shi, Feng
    Lee, Hsuan-Wei
    Mucha, Peter J.
    [J]. CHAOS, 2016, 26 (12)
  • [6] Separate or perish - the coevolving voter model
    Kulakowski, K.
    Stojkow, M.
    Zuchowska-Skiba, D.
    Gawronski, P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS C, 2018, 29 (07):
  • [7] Fragmentation transitions in multistate voter models
    Boehme, Gesa A.
    Gross, Thilo
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2012, 85 (06):
  • [8] Fitting in and breaking up: A nonlinear version of coevolving voter models
    Kureh, Yacoub H.
    Porter, Mason A.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2020, 101 (06)
  • [9] Coupling of link- and node-ordering in the coevolving voter model
    Toruniewska, J.
    Kulakowski, K.
    Suchecki, K.
    Holyst, J. A.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2017, 96 (04)
  • [10] Early fragmentation in the adaptive voter model on directed networks
    Zschaler, Gerd
    Boehme, Gesa A.
    Seissinger, Michael
    Huepe, Cristian
    Gross, Thilo
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2012, 85 (04):