GPS phase center variation modeling using ambiguity-fixed carrier phase observations from low Earth orbit satellites

被引:0
|
作者
Wei Zhang
Keke Zhang
Xingxing Li
Baoguo Yu
Shenying Hui
Yongqiang Yuan
Jiaqi Wu
Hongjie Zheng
机构
[1] Wuhan University,School of Geodesy and Geomatics
[2] State Key Laboratory of Satellite Navigation System and Equipment Technology,undefined
来源
GPS Solutions | 2023年 / 27卷
关键词
Antenna phase center variation (PCV); Low Earth orbit (LEO) onboard observations; LEO-based GPS PCV calibration; Integer ambiguity resolution (IAR);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Precise knowledge of the antenna phase center variations (PCVs) of global navigation satellite system (GNSS) is indispensable for GNSS high-precision applications. Currently, the PCV models of most GNSS satellites are exclusively estimated from ground observations, which reveals some drawbacks such as limited nadir coverage (usually < 14°) and high correlation with tropospheric parameters. Onboard observations from plenty of low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites launched in recent years offer us a great chance to investigate the LEO-based GNSS PCV calibration. We estimate GPS PCV model using ambiguity-fixed carrier phase observations from multiple LEO satellites to obtain more reliable GPS PCVs. Onboard data of eight LEO satellites from day of year (DOY) 122, 2019 to DOY 180, 2019 are processed. We first evaluate the contribution of integer ambiguity resolution (IAR) to the LEO PCV calibration. Compared with the traditional ambiguity-float PCVs, the ambiguity-fixed PCVs can contribute to the maximum reduction of 6.2% in carrier phase residuals and 8.0% in satellite laser ranging (SLR) residuals. After that the LEO-based GPS PCV calibration using different LEO satellites is performed and the impact of different estimation strategies and datum definitions is assessed in detail. The results show that the IAR can contribute to the stability improvement in GPS PCVs by (24.5%, 41.5%, 42.4%, and 45.2%) for four BLOCKs. As the number of LEO satellites increases, GPS PCVs gain an evident stability improvement. With the inclusion of eight LEO satellites, the PCV stability is mainly within 0.3 mm with the maximum improvement of 63.8% and the PCV difference w.r.t igs14.atx is less than 1 mm. Meanwhile, we also find that the LEO-based GPS PCV calibration is hardly influenced by the datum definition which is applied to decouple GPS PCVs and LEO PCVs. Validation results indicate that our GPS PCV estimates slightly outperform PCV model from igs14.atx with the LEO kinematic orbit accuracy improvement of 5.1% and the precise point positioning (PPP) error reduction of 1.1%. The reference frame scale of our GPS PCV estimates is also consistent with that from igs14.atx.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] GPS phase center variation modeling using ambiguity-fixed carrier phase observations from low Earth orbit satellites
    Zhang, Wei
    Zhang, Keke
    Li, Xingxing
    Yu, Baoguo
    Hui, Shenying
    Yuan, Yongqiang
    Wu, Jiaqi
    Zheng, Hongjie
    [J]. GPS SOLUTIONS, 2023, 27 (03)
  • [2] Precise orbit determination of the Sentinel-3A altimetry satellite using ambiguity-fixed GPS carrier phase observations
    Montenbruck, Oliver
    Hackel, Stefan
    Jaggi, Adrian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2018, 92 (07) : 711 - 726
  • [3] Precise orbit determination of the Sentinel-3A altimetry satellite using ambiguity-fixed GPS carrier phase observations
    Oliver Montenbruck
    Stefan Hackel
    Adrian Jäggi
    [J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2018, 92 : 711 - 726
  • [4] LEO real-time ambiguity-fixed precise orbit determination with onboard GPS/Galileo observations
    Li, Xingxing
    Zhao, Yehao
    Zhang, Keke
    Wu, Jiaqi
    Zheng, Hongjie
    Zhang, Wei
    [J]. GPS SOLUTIONS, 2024, 28 (04)
  • [5] Calibrating GNSS phase biases with onboard observations of low earth orbit satellites
    Li, Xingxing
    Wu, Jiaqi
    Li, Xin
    Liu, Gege
    Zhang, Qian
    Zhang, Keke
    Zhang, Wei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2022, 96 (02)
  • [6] Calibrating GNSS phase biases with onboard observations of low earth orbit satellites
    Xingxing Li
    Jiaqi Wu
    Xin Li
    Gege Liu
    Qian Zhang
    Keke Zhang
    Wei Zhang
    [J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2022, 96
  • [7] Carrier phase GPS positioning and ambiguity resolution by using H∞ filters
    Kubo, Y
    Ito, A
    Kihara, M
    Sugimoto, S
    [J]. IEEE RO-MAN 2000: 9TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON ROBOT AND HUMAN INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 41 - 46
  • [8] Precise orbit determination for low Earth orbit satellites using GNSS: Observations, models, and methods
    Mao, Xinyuan
    Wang, Wenbing
    Gao, Yang
    [J]. ASTRODYNAMICS, 2024, 8 (3) : 349 - 374
  • [9] SIMPLIFIED ORBIT DETERMINATION ALGORITHM FOR LOW EARTH ORBIT SATELLITES USING SPACEBORNE GPS NAVIGATION SENSOR
    Aghav, Sandip Tukaram
    Gangal, Shashikala Achyut
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL SATELLITES-JOURNAL OF PLANETARY GEODESY, 2014, 49 (02): : 81 - 99
  • [10] GEO Precise Orbit Determination Using Onboard GPS Carrier Phase Observations of Optical Data Relay Satellite
    Matsumoto, Takehiro
    Sakamoto, Takushi
    Yoshikawa, Kazuhiro
    Kasho, Sachiyo
    Nakajima, Ayano
    Nakamura, Shinichi
    [J]. 35th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation, ION GNSS+ 2022, 2022, 1 : 607 - 620