Screening agars for MRSA: Evaluation of a stepwise diagnostic approach with two different selective agars for the screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)

被引:9
|
作者
Micheel V. [1 ]
Hogan B. [2 ]
Köller T. [3 ]
Warnke P. [3 ]
Crusius S. [3 ]
Hinz R. [1 ]
Hagen R.M. [1 ]
Schwarz N.G. [2 ]
Frickmann H. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] German Armed Forces Hospital of Hamburg, Department of Tropical Medicine at the Bernhard Nocht Institute, Hamburg
[2] Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine Hamburg, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Hamburg
[3] University Medicine Rostock, Institute for Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, Rostock
关键词
CHROMagar; ChromID agar; Chromogenic agar; Hygiene; Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Screening; Selective agar; Stepwise diagnostics;
D O I
10.1186/s40779-015-0046-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) poses a hygiene risk that does not spare field hospitals or military medical field camps during military deployments. Diagnostic options for unambiguously identifying MRSA isolates are usually scarce in military environments. In this study, we assessed the stepwise application of two different selective agars for the specific identification of MRSA in screening analyses. Methods: Nasal swabs from 1541 volunteers were subjected to thioglycollate broth enrichment and subsequently screened on CHROMagar MRSA selective agar for the identification of MRSA. The MRSA identity of suspicious-looking colonies was confirmed afterwards or excluded by another selective agar, chromID MRSA. All isolates from the selective agars with MRSA-specific colony morphology were identified by biochemical methods and mass spectrometry. Results: The initial CHROMagar MRSA screening identified suspicious colonies in 36 out of 1541 samples. A total of 25 of these 36 isolates showed MRSA-like growth on chromID agar. Out of these 25 isolates, 24 were confirmed as MRSA, while one isolate was identified as Staphylococcus kloosii. From the 11 strains that did not show suspicious growth on chromID agar, 3 were methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA, with one instance of co-colonization with Corynebacterium spp.), 2 were confirmed as MRSA (with 1 instance of co-colonization with MSSA), 2 were lost during passaging and could not be re-cultured, one could not be identified by the applied approaches, and the remaining 3 strains were identified as Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Staphylococcus hominis (co-colonized with Macrococcus caseolyticus) and Staphylococcus cohnii, respectively. Conclusions: The application of the selective agar CHROMagar MRSA alone proved to be too non-specific to allow for a reliable diagnosis of the presence of MRSA. The combined use of two selective agars in a stepwise approach reduced this non-specificity with an acceptably low loss of sensitivity. Accordingly, such a stepwise screening approach might be an option for resource-restricted military medical field camps. © 2015 Micheel et al.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Screening agars for MRSA: evaluation of a stepwise diagnostic approach with two different selective agars for the screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA)
    Volker Micheel
    Benedikt Hogan
    Thomas K?ller
    Philipp Warnke
    Sabine Crusius
    Rebecca Hinz
    Ralf Matthias Hagen
    Norbert Georg Schwarz
    Hagen Frickmann
    Military Medical Research, 2015, 2 (04) : 213 - 219
  • [2] Evaluation of Commercial Selective Agars in Screening for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
    Yang, Hee-Young
    Suh, Jin-Tae
    Lee, Hee-Joo
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND LABORATORY SCIENCE, 2010, 40 (03): : 252 - 256
  • [3] Evaluation of four selective agars and two enrichment broths in screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
    Bocher, S.
    Smyth, R.
    Kahlmeter, G.
    Kerremans, J.
    Vos, M. C.
    Skov, R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 46 (09) : 3136 - 3138
  • [4] Screening strategies in surveillance and control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
    Robotham, J. V.
    Jenkins, D. R.
    Medley, G. F.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2007, 135 (02): : 328 - 342
  • [5] Rapid screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) did not reduce MRSA acquisition rate
    Jeyaratnam, D.
    Whitty, C. J.
    Phillips, K.
    Pegues, David A.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 149 (04)
  • [6] Evaluation of Rapid Culture Screening Assay for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) for Detection of Environmental MRSA Contamination
    Sherlock, O.
    O'Connell, N.
    Creamer, E.
    O'Hara, S.
    Humphreys, H.
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 30 (06): : 604 - 606
  • [7] Predictive factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection in a MRSA screening protocol.
    Reis, Daniel
    Silva, Margarida Costa
    Ribeiro, Carla
    Silva, Eloisa
    Dias, Margarida
    Coutinho, Daniel Pires
    Shiang, Teresa
    Abreu, Gabriela
    Sanches, Ines
    Vanzeller, Manuela
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2018, 52
  • [8] Combined use of Pastorex Staph-Plus and either of two new chromogenic agars, MRSA ID and CHROMagar MRSA, for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
    Compernolle, Veerle
    Verschraegen, Gerda
    Claeys, Geert
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 45 (01) : 154 - 158
  • [9] Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
    Randolph, Susan A.
    WORKPLACE HEALTH & SAFETY, 2012, 60 (03) : 136 - 136
  • [10] Systematic Review of the Clinical Utility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Nasal Screening for MRSA Pneumonia
    Smith, Melanie N.
    Brotherton, Amy L.
    Lusardi, Katherine
    Tan, Carrie A.
    Hammond, Drayton A.
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2019, 53 (06) : 627 - 638