Wrapper positive Bayesian network classifiers

被引:0
|
作者
Borja Calvo
Iñaki Inza
Pedro Larrañaga
Jose A. Lozano
机构
[1] UPV/EHU,Intelligent Systems Group, Department of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence
[2] Universidad Politécnica de Madrid,Computational Intelligence Group, Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial
来源
关键词
Positive unlabelled learning; Bayesian network classifiers; Wrapper classifiers; Classifier evaluation; Pseudo F;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the information retrieval framework, there are problems where the goal is to recover objects of a particular class from big sets of unlabelled objects. In some of these problems, only examples from the class we want to recover are available. For such problems, the machine learning community has developed algorithms that are able to learn binary classifiers in the absence of negative examples. Among them, we can find the positive Bayesian network classifiers, algorithms that induce Bayesian network classifiers from positive and unlabelled examples. The main drawback of these algorithms is that they require some previous knowledge about the a priori probability distribution of the class. In this paper, we propose a wrapper approach to tackle the learning when no such information is available, setting this probability at the optimal value in terms of the recovery of positive examples. The evaluation of classifiers in positive unlabelled learning problems is a non-trivial question. We have also worked on this problem, and we have proposed a new guiding metric to be used in the search for the optimal a priori probability of the positive class that we have called the pseudo F. We have empirically tested the proposed metric and the wrapper classifiers on both synthetic and real-life datasets. The results obtained in this empirical comparison show that the wrapper Bayesian network classifiers provide competitive results, particularly when the actual a priori probability of the positive class is high.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 654
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Wrapper positive Bayesian network classifiers
    Calvo, Borja
    Inza, Inaki
    Larranaga, Pedro
    Lozano, Jose A.
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2012, 33 (03) : 631 - 654
  • [2] Bayesian network classifiers
    Friedman, N
    Geiger, D
    Goldszmidt, M
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 1997, 29 (2-3) : 131 - 163
  • [3] Bayesian Network Classifiers
    Nir Friedman
    Dan Geiger
    Moises Goldszmidt
    [J]. Machine Learning, 1997, 29 : 131 - 163
  • [4] Boosted Bayesian network classifiers
    Jing, Yushi
    Pavlovic, Vladimir
    Rehg, James M.
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2008, 73 (02) : 155 - 184
  • [5] Approximate Bayesian network classifiers
    Slezak, D
    Wróblewski, J
    [J]. ROUGH SETS AND CURRENT TRENDS IN COMPUTING, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 2475 : 365 - 372
  • [6] Comparing Bayesian network classifiers
    Cheng, J
    Greiner, R
    [J]. UNCERTAINTY IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 1999, : 101 - 108
  • [7] Adaptive Bayesian network classifiers
    Castillo, Gladys
    Gama, Joao
    [J]. INTELLIGENT DATA ANALYSIS, 2009, 13 (01) : 39 - 59
  • [8] Boosted Bayesian network classifiers
    Yushi Jing
    Vladimir Pavlović
    James M. Rehg
    [J]. Machine Learning, 2008, 73 : 155 - 184
  • [9] Bayesian Classifiers for Positive Unlabeled Learning
    He, Jiazhen
    Zhang, Yang
    Li, Xue
    Wang, Yong
    [J]. WEB-AGE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2011, 6897 : 81 - +
  • [10] Learning Bayesian classifiers from dependency network classifiers
    Gamez, Jose A.
    Mateo, Juan L.
    Puerta, Jose M.
    [J]. ADAPTIVE AND NATURAL COMPUTING ALGORITHMS, PT 1, 2007, 4431 : 806 - +