A comparison of reading comprehension across paper, computer screens, and tablets: Does tablet familiarity matter?

被引:0
|
作者
Guang Chen
Wei Cheng
Ting-Wen Chang
Xiaoxia Zheng
Ronghuai Huang
机构
[1] Beijing Normal University,School of Educational Technology, Faculty of Education
[2] Beijing Normal University,Collaborative & Innovative Center for Educational Technology (CICET)
[3] Beijing Normal University,Beijing Key Laboratory of Education Technology
关键词
Screen reading; Digital reading; Reading comprehension; Tablet familiarity;
D O I
10.1007/s40692-014-0012-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Nowadays, reading on screens is an essential part of our daily life. Tablet computers, with great portability, usability, and interactivity, have become a popular mobile device for learning and reading. However, there were few studies to explore the effects on reading using tablet computers, and the difference between computer-based reading and paper-based reading is still not clear. Therefore, this study focused on to investigate the effects of reading comprehension across paper, tablets, and computers. Moreover, the user familiarity was regarded as a potential issue to affect the reading on digital devices. Accordingly, this study took into account to figure out the effects and impacts of the user familiarity on reading comprehension while reading on tablets. Two question types of reading comprehension, multiple choice questions as the shallow level comprehension and summarization as deep level comprehension, were considered to test the reading comprehension. Data from 90 college students were used in the data analysis. It was indicated that the paper group performed significantly better than the computer-based reading on the shallow level comprehension. This finding confirmed and eliminated the factors of reading in paper and computer for the previous studies. For example, the way of navigation was still the main reason to affect the process of reading. However, the switch between the reading and test media was not the reason to affect the reading comprehension. In order to figure out why there was no difference between tablets and the other two media platforms, the tablet familiarity was evaluated to find out whether the familiarity affect reading comprehension or not. The result showed that the high level of tablet familiarity group performed significantly better than low level group on deep level comprehension. For this result, it could conclude that if providing students enough and appropriate training, they could have higher familiarity with tablets and then gain better reading comprehension using tablets.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 225
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of reading comprehension across paper, computer screens, and tablets: Does tablet familiarity matter?
    Chen, Guang
    Cheng, Wei
    Chang, Ting-Wen
    Zheng, Xiaoxia
    Huang, Ronghuai
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS IN EDUCATION, 2014, 1 (2-3) : 213 - 225
  • [2] E-readers, Computer Screens, or Paper: Does Reading Comprehension Change Across Media Platforms?
    Margolin, Sara J.
    Driscoll, Casey
    Toland, Michael J.
    Kegler, Jennifer Little
    [J]. APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 27 (04) : 512 - 519
  • [3] Which is the Best for Reading: Paper, Computer or Tablet Computer?
    Cheng, Wei
    Zheng, Xiaoxia
    Li, Meishuang
    Chen, Guang
    [J]. 2014 14TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES (ICALT), 2014, : 655 - +
  • [4] Advantages of Print Reading over Screen Reading: A Comparison of Visual Patterns, Reading Performance, and Reading Attitudes across Paper, Computers, and Tablets
    Jeong, You Jin
    Gweon, Gahgene
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2021, 37 (17) : 1674 - 1684
  • [5] Effects of two computer-based interventions on reading comprehension: Does strategy instruction matter?
    Serrano-Mendizabal, Marian
    Villalon, Ruth
    Melero, Angeles
    Izquierdo-Magaldi, Belen
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2023, 196
  • [6] Comparison of visual similarity judgement on computer screens and on paper
    Song, Guangfeng
    [J]. THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE, 2013, 14 (02) : 126 - 137
  • [7] Reading Rate and Comprehension for Text Presented on Tablet and Paper: Evidence from Arabic
    Hermena, Ehab W.
    Sheen, Mercedes
    AlJassmi, Maryam
    AlFalasi, Khulood
    AlMatroushi, Maha
    Jordan, Timothy R.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [8] Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension
    Mangen, Anne
    Walgermo, Bente R.
    Bronnick, Kolbjorn
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2013, 58 : 61 - 68
  • [9] Contribution of Word Reading Speed to Reading Comprehension in Brazilian Children: Does Speed Matter to the Comprehension Model?
    Seabra, Alessandra G.
    Dias, Natalia M.
    Mecca, Tatiana
    Macedo, Elizeu C.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [10] Does Structure Matter? Encoding Documents for Machine Reading Comprehension
    Wan, Hui
    Feng, Song
    Gunasekara, Chulaka
    Patel, Siva Sankalp
    Joshi, Sachindra
    Lastras, Luis A.
    [J]. 2021 CONFERENCE OF THE NORTH AMERICAN CHAPTER OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS: HUMAN LANGUAGE TECHNOLOGIES (NAACL-HLT 2021), 2021, : 4626 - 4634