Effects of agri-environment schemes on plant diversity in Bavarian grasslands

被引:0
|
作者
F. Mayer
S. Heinz
G. Kuhn
机构
[1] Institute of Agricultural Ecology,Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture
来源
Community Ecology | 2008年 / 9卷
关键词
Agricultural grassland; Management intensity; Monitoring; Plant species diversity; Species frequency; Survey; Wisskirchen and Haeupler (1998);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Grasslands play an important role in terms of biodiversity, landscape and agriculture. For 25 years, the Bavarian agri-environment scheme (AES) “Agricultural landscape program” (KULAP) has been funding management practices which are intended to conserve cultural landscapes and enhance biodiversity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the Bavarian AES schemes in terms of plant diversity. As AES is divided into many different, clearly divergent schemes, each of these schemes was evaluated separately. The evaluation focussed not only on species richness but also on other diversity parameters such as the presence of rare and common species, the percentage of species group members and the evenness as well as agronomic values such as forage value, percentage of agronomically desirable species or percentage of weeds. In order to achieve this goal, we selected about 950 pairs of grassland plots with and without AES. Differences in species richness between AES and control plots were most significant in the site related AES schemes and organic farming, whereas plots with other farm related AES schemes hardly differed from their controls. Obviously, schemes which really demand management changes on the part of the farmer have a definite effect on plant species diversity in grasslands compared to those which closely resemble conventional management.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 236
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of agri-environment schemes on plant diversity in Bavarian grasslands
    Mayer, F.
    Heinz, S.
    Kuhn, G.
    [J]. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY, 2008, 9 (02) : 229 - 236
  • [2] The effect of agri-environment schemes on amphibian diversity and abundance
    Maes, Joke
    Musters, C. J. M.
    De Snoo, Geert R.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2008, 141 (03) : 635 - 645
  • [3] Temporal effects of agri-environment schemes on ditch bank plant species
    van Dijk, William F. A.
    Schaffers, Andre P.
    Leewis, Lies
    Berendse, Frank
    de Snoo, Geert R.
    [J]. BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2013, 14 (04) : 289 - 297
  • [4] Restoration of plant diversity on ditch banks: Seed and site limitation in response to agri-environment schemes
    Leng, X.
    Musters, C. J. M.
    de Snoo, G. R.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2009, 142 (07) : 1340 - 1349
  • [5] Transaction costs in agri-environment schemes
    Whitten, Stuart
    Coggan, Anthea
    [J]. LEARNING FROM AGRI-ENVIRONMENT SCHEMES IN AUSTRALIA: INVESTING IN BIODIVERSITY AND OTHER ECOSYSTEM SERVICES ON FARMS, 2016, : 207 - 217
  • [6] Agri-environment schemes are associated with greater terrestrial invertebrate abundance and richness in upland grasslands
    Arnott, Amy
    Riddell, Gillian
    Emmerson, Mark
    Reid, Neil
    [J]. AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 42 (01)
  • [7] Agri-environment schemes are associated with greater terrestrial invertebrate abundance and richness in upland grasslands
    Amy Arnott
    Gillian Riddell
    Mark Emmerson
    Neil Reid
    [J]. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2022, 42
  • [8] Effects of landscape complexity on the ecological effectiveness of agri-environment schemes
    Elena D. Concepción
    Mario Díaz
    Rocío A. Baquero
    [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2008, 23 : 135 - 148
  • [9] Effects of landscape complexity on the ecological effectiveness of agri-environment schemes
    Concepcion, Elena D.
    Diaz, Mario
    Baquero, Rocio A.
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2008, 23 (02) : 135 - 148
  • [10] Collective agri-environment schemes: How can regional environmental cooperatives enhance farmers' intentions for agri-environment schemes?
    van Dijk, William F. A.
    Lokhorst, Anne Marike
    Berendse, Frank
    de Snoo, Geert R.
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2015, 42 : 759 - 766