Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in younger versus older adults with renal cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Tomida, Ryotaro [1 ]
Fukawa, Tomoya [1 ]
Kusuhara, Yoshito [1 ]
Hashimoto, Keisuke [2 ]
Shiozaki, Keito [3 ]
Izumi, Kazuyoshi [4 ]
Ninomiya, Iku [5 ]
Kadoriku, Fumiya [5 ]
Izaki, Hirofumi [3 ]
Naroda, Takushi [2 ]
Okamoto, Kenjiro [5 ]
Kawanishi, Yasuo [4 ]
Kanayama, Hiro-omi [1 ]
Takahashi, Masayuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokushima Univ, Dept Urol, Grad Sch Biomed Sci, 3-18-15 Kuramoto cho, Tokushima 7708503, Japan
[2] Japanese Red Cross Kochi Hosp, Kochi, Japan
[3] Tokushima Prefectural Cent Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Tokushima, Japan
[4] Takamatsu Red Cross Hosp, Takamatsu, Japan
[5] Ehime Prefectural Cent Hosp, Matsuyama, Japan
关键词
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy; Renal cell carcinoma; Chronic kidney disease; Robot-assisted surgery; LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES; OCTOGENARIANS; MORBIDITY; TRIFECTA; PROPOSAL; COHORT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-024-04917-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose Our study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) between younger and older patients after adjusting for their background differences. We particularly assessed RAPN outcomes and safety in older patients. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 559 patients clinically diagnosed with T1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and treated with RAPN between 2013 and 2022 at five institutions in Japan. The patients were classified into two groups according to their age during surgery (younger group: < 75 years, older group: >= 75 years). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to adjust for the differences in the backgrounds between younger and older patients, and surgical outcomes were compared. Results Among the 559 patients, 422 (75.5%) and 137 (24.5%) were classified into the younger and older groups, respectively; 204 and 102 patients from the younger and older groups were matched according to PSM, respectively. Subsequently, patient characteristics other than age were not significantly different between the two groups. In the matched cohort, the older group had more patients with major complications (younger, 3.0%; older, 8.8%; P = 0.045). Conclusion Surgical outcomes of RAPN in older patients with RCC were comparable with those in younger patients, although older patients experiencedsignificantly more complications than younger patients. These results suggest the need for further detailed preoperative evaluation and appropriate postoperative management in older patients receiving RAPN.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Letter to the editor about "Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in younger versus older adults with renal cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis"
    Bian, Wentao
    Wu, Xinyan
    Feng, Yangdongping
    Cao, Qiang
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)
  • [2] Robot-Assisted versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Giant Sporadic Renal Angiomyolipomas of ≥7 cm: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
    Xiong, Yunqiang
    Deng, Wen
    Chen, Ru
    Liu, Xiaoqiang
    Zhu, Ke
    Wang, Jiayao
    Long, Jiahui
    Jiang, Haoxin
    Chen, Luyao
    Fu, Bin
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 2021
  • [3] Predictors of renal function after open and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: A propensity score-matched study
    Yu, Young Dong
    Ngoc Ha Nguyen
    Ryu, Ho Young
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    Byun, Seok-Soo
    Lee, Sangchul
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 (03) : 377 - 384
  • [4] Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A propensity score-matched comparative analysis of surgical outcomes and preserved renal parenchymal volume
    Tachibana, Hidekazu
    Takagi, Toshio
    Kondo, Tsunenori
    Ishida, Hideki
    Tanabe, Kazunari
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 25 (04) : 359 - 364
  • [5] Clinical advantages of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in terms of global and split renal functions: A propensity score-matched comparative analysis
    Kobayashi, Satoshi
    Mutaguchi, Jun
    Kashiwagi, Eiji
    Takeuchi, Ario
    Shiota, Masaki
    Inokuchi, Junichi
    Eto, Masatoshi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 28 (06) : 630 - 636
  • [6] Comparisons of the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for large angiomyolipomas: a propensity score-matched analysis
    Zhang, Shengjie
    Lin, Tingsheng
    Liu, Guangxiang
    Zhang, Shiwei
    Guo, Hongqian
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2020, 52 (09) : 1675 - 1682
  • [7] Comparisons of the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for large angiomyolipomas: a propensity score-matched analysis
    Shengjie Zhang
    Tingsheng Lin
    Guangxiang Liu
    Shiwei Zhang
    Hongqian Guo
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2020, 52 : 1675 - 1682
  • [8] Comparison of surgical outcomes and split renal function between laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis
    Tomoya Hatayama
    Ryo Tasaka
    Hideki Mochizuki
    Koji Mita
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2022, 54 : 805 - 811
  • [9] Comparison of surgical outcomes and split renal function between laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis
    Hatayama, Tomoya
    Tasaka, Ryo
    Mochizuki, Hideki
    Mita, Koji
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2022, 54 (04) : 805 - 811
  • [10] Editorial Comment to Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A propensity score-matched comparative analysis of surgical outcomes and preserved renal parenchymal volume
    Papalia, Rocco
    Mastroianni, Riccardo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 25 (04) : 364 - 365