Newer Immunosuppression and Strategies on the Horizon in Heart Transplantation

被引:0
|
作者
Broch K. [1 ]
Gude E. [1 ]
Andreassen A.K. [1 ,2 ]
Gullestad L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Postboks 4950, Nydalen, Oslo
[2] Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo
关键词
Calcineurin inhibitor; Heart transplantation; Immunosuppression; Tolerance;
D O I
10.1007/s40472-017-0159-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose of Review: Balanced immunosuppressive therapy is the key to long-term survival after allograft transplantation. With a worldwide median recipient/graft survival of more than 11 years, heart transplantation is a highly successful treatment for selected patients with end-stage heart failure. However, current immunosuppressive regimens are associated with adverse effects. In the balance between acute rejection, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, infections and an increased risk of malignancy, there is room for improvement. The aim of this review article is to present an overview of immunosuppressive mechanisms and new immune therapy strategies in heart transplantation and to highlight emerging approaches in this field that may influence our immunosuppressive strategies in the future. Recent Findings: Calcineurin inhibitors have been the central drug class in post-transplant immunosuppressive regimens. New trials have explored alternative drugs, such as inhibitors of mechanistic target of rapamycin and belatacept. There is ongoing research on the development of strategies to induce long-term allograft tolerance. Summary: This review briefly introduces allograft rejection immunology, and sums up contemporary immunosuppressive strategies with emphasis on the development of calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimens and the prospect of achieving long-term tolerance. © 2017, Springer International Publishing AG.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 237
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Strategies in Immunosuppression After Heart Transplantation Is Less Better?
    Kobashigawa, Jon A.
    CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2011, 4 (02) : 111 - 113
  • [2] Individualizing immunosuppression for heart transplantation: Strategies for the next decade
    Valantine, HA
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1997, 29 (8A) : 5S - 8S
  • [3] Current strategies and future trends in immunosuppression after heart transplantation
    Aliabadi, Arezu
    Cochrane, Adam B.
    Zuckermann, Andreas O.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 17 (05) : 540 - 545
  • [4] IMMUNOSUPPRESSION FOR HEART-TRANSPLANTATION
    WHITE, DJG
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE, 1993, 50 (03) : 277 - 283
  • [5] On the horizon: Tailor-made immunosuppression in renal transplantation
    Warrens, AN
    NEPHRON CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2003, 94 (01): : C5 - C10
  • [6] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF DIFFERENT IMMUNOSUPPRESSION STRATEGIES (IS) IN COMBINED HEART AND KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION (CHKT)
    Amador Mos, Fernando
    Peradejordi, Margarita
    Favaloro, Liliana
    Florencia Renedo, Maria
    Laura Guazzone, Analia
    Morejon Barragan, Paola
    Maria Gutierrez, Luis
    Marcela Fortunato, Rita
    Mario Bertolotti, Alejandro
    Favaloro, Roberto
    Miguel Raffaele, Pablo
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 30 : 224 - 225
  • [7] Induction Immunosuppression Strategies and Long-Term Outcomes after Heart Transplantation
    Ansari, D.
    Stehlik, J.
    Lund, L. H.
    Andersson, B.
    Edwards, L. B.
    Nilsson, J.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 35 (04): : S62 - S62
  • [8] Induction immunosuppression strategies and long-term outcomes after heart transplantation
    Nozohoor, Shahab
    Stehlik, Josef
    Lund, Lars H.
    Ansari, David
    Andersson, Bodil
    Nilsson, Johan
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 34 (07)
  • [9] Strategies for minimizing immunosuppression in kidney transplantation
    Kirk, AD
    Mannon, RB
    Swanson, SJ
    Hale, DA
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 18 (01) : 2 - 14
  • [10] Strategies in the immunosuppression after kidney transplantation
    Sperschneider, H
    Heemann, U
    Stein, G
    MEDIZINISCHE KLINIK, 2003, 98 (03) : 140 - 145