Sediment load prediction in Johor river: deep learning versus machine learning models

被引:0
|
作者
Sarmad Dashti Latif
K. L. Chong
Ali Najah Ahmed
Y. F. Huang
Mohsen Sherif
Ahmed El-Shafie
机构
[1] Komar University of Science and Technology,Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering
[2] Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman,Department of Civil Engineering, Lee Kong Chian Faculty of Engineering and Science
[3] Universiti Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN),Dam Safety Management & Engineering Group, Institute of Energy Infrastructure and Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering
[4] United Arab Emirates University,National Water and Energy Center
[5] United Arab Emirates University,Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, College of Engineering
[6] University of Malaya,Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering
来源
Applied Water Science | 2023年 / 13卷
关键词
Long short-term memory (LSTM); Artificial neural network (ANN); Support vector machine (SVM); Sediment transport prediction;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Sediment transport is a normal phenomenon in rivers and streams, contributing significantly to ecosystem production and preservation by replenishing vital nutrients and preserving aquatic life’s natural habitats. Thus, sediment transport prediction through modeling is crucial for predicting flood events, tracking coastal erosion, planning for water supplies, and managing irrigation. The predictability of process-driven models may encounter various restrictions throughout the validation process. Given that data-driven models work on the assumption that the underlying physical process is not requisite, this opens up the avenue for AI-based model as alternative modeling. However, AI-based models, such as ANN and SVM, face problems, such as long-term dependency, which require alternative dynamic procedures. Since their performance as universal function approximation depends on their compatibility with the nature of the problem itself, this study investigated several distinct AI-based models, such as long short-term memory (LSTM), artificial neural network (ANN), and support vector machine (SVM), in predicting sediment transport in the Johor river. The collected historical daily sediment transport data from January 1, 2008, to December 01, 2018, through autocorrelation function, were used as input for the model. The statistical results showed that, despite their ability (deep learning and machine learning) to provide sediment predictions based on historical input datasets, machine learning, such as ANN, might be more prone to overfitting or being trapped in a local optimum than deep learning, evidenced by the worse in all metrics score. With RMSE = 11.395, MAE = 18.094, and R2 = 0.914, LSTM outperformed other models in the comparison.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sediment load prediction in Johor river: deep learning versus machine learning models
    Latif, Sarmad Dashti
    Chong, K. L.
    Ahmed, Ali Najah
    Huang, Y. F.
    Sherif, Mohsen
    El-Shafie, Ahmed
    [J]. APPLIED WATER SCIENCE, 2023, 13 (03)
  • [2] Prediction of river suspended sediment load using machine learning models and geo-morphometric parameters
    Asadi M.
    Fathzadeh A.
    Kerry R.
    Ebrahimi-Khusfi Z.
    Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi R.
    [J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021, 14 (18)
  • [3] Comprehensive evaluation of machine learning models for suspended sediment load inflow prediction in a reservoir
    Idrees, Muhammad Bilal
    Jehanzaib, Muhammad
    Kim, Dongkyun
    Kim, Tae-Woong
    [J]. STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2021, 35 (09) : 1805 - 1823
  • [4] Comprehensive evaluation of machine learning models for suspended sediment load inflow prediction in a reservoir
    Muhammad Bilal Idrees
    Muhammad Jehanzaib
    Dongkyun Kim
    Tae-Woong Kim
    [J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2021, 35 : 1805 - 1823
  • [5] Review of machine learning and deep learning models for toxicity prediction
    Guo, Wenjing
    Liu, Jie
    Dong, Fan
    Song, Meng
    Li, Zoe
    Khan, Md Kamrul Hasan
    Patterson, Tucker A.
    Hong, Huixiao
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2023, 248 (21) : 1952 - 1973
  • [6] A comparison of machine learning models for suspended sediment load classification
    AlDahoul, Nouar
    Ahmed, Ali Najah
    Allawi, Mohammed Falah
    Sherif, Mohsen
    Sefelnasr, Ahmed
    Chau, Kwok-wing
    El-Shafie, Ahmed
    [J]. ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID MECHANICS, 2022, 16 (01) : 1211 - 1232
  • [7] Building thermal load prediction through shallow machine learning and deep learning
    Wang, Zhe
    Hong, Tianzhen
    Piette, Mary Ann
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 263
  • [8] Prediction of Preeclampsia Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models: A Review
    Aljameel, Sumayh S.
    Alzahrani, Manar
    Almusharraf, Reem
    Altukhais, Majd
    Alshaia, Sadeem
    Sahlouli, Hanan
    Aslam, Nida
    Khan, Irfan Ullah
    Alabbad, Dina A.
    Alsumayt, Albandari
    [J]. BIG DATA AND COGNITIVE COMPUTING, 2023, 7 (01)
  • [9] Wind Power Prediction Based on Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models
    Tarek, Zahraa
    Shams, Mahmoud Y.
    Elshewey, Ahmed M.
    El-kenawy, El-Sayed M.
    Ibrahim, Abdelhameed
    Abdelhamid, Abdelaziz A.
    El-dosuky, Mohamed A.
    [J]. CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA, 2023, 74 (01): : 715 - 732
  • [10] Use of explainable machine learning models in blast load prediction
    Widanage, C.
    Mohotti, D.
    Lee, C. K.
    Wijesooriya, K.
    Meddage, D. P. P.
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2024, 312