Impact of platinum-based chemotherapy on the prognosis of early triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Fuxing Zhao
Guoshuang Shen
Qiuxia Dong
Yuanfang Xin
Xingfa Huo
Miaozhou Wang
Zhen Liu
Yi Zhao
Dengfeng Ren
Qiqi Xie
Zhilin Liu
Zitao Li
Lihong Gao
Feng Du
Jiuda Zhao
机构
[1] Breast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University,Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education/Beijing), The VIPII Gastrointes
[2] The Fifth People’s Hospital of Qinghai Province,undefined
[3] The First Ward of Oncology,undefined
[4] Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute,undefined
来源
关键词
Triple-negative breast cancer; Platinum; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Adjuvant chemotherapy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although platinum-based chemotherapy can improve pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), the impact on survival of platinum-based neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy is still controversial. Our meta-analysis aimed at analyzing survival with platinum-based neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with TNBC. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane databases, and several major conferences up to January 2021. Fixed and random models were used for our meta-analysis. Disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and side effects data were extracted from the included literature in addition to the corresponding pooled hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of nine studies involving 3247 patients were included. The pooled analysis suggested that compared with anthracycline- and/or paclitaxel-based chemotherapy, platinum-based chemotherapy could further improve DFS (HR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.45–0.67, p < 0.01) and OS (HR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.38–0.70, p < 0.01) in patients with TNBC. The subgroup analysis showed that platinum-based chemotherapy could further improve DFS (HR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.43–0.74, p < 0.01) and OS (HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.40–0.83, p < 0.01) in neoadjuvant chemotherapy and DFS (HR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.37–0.69, p < 0.01) and OS (HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.23–0.69, p < 0.01) in adjuvant chemotherapy compared with anthracycline- and/or paclitaxel-based chemotherapy in patients with TNBC. In addition, compared with anthracycline-based chemotherapy, platinum-based chemotherapy without anthracycline chemotherapy could further improve DFS (HR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.37–0.70, p < 0.01) and OS (HR = 0.46, 95%CI 0.19–0.72, p < 0.01) in patients with TNBC. Compared with anthracycline- and/or paclitaxel-based chemotherapy, all-grade diarrhea, fatigue, and grade ≥ 3 anemia were higher in platinum-based chemotherapy. In contrast, all-grade anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, peripheral neuropathy, myalgia/arthralgia, cardiac toxicity were lower in platinum-based chemotherapy; grade ≥ 3 leukopenia, neutropenia and myalgia/arthralgia were also lower. Compared with anthracycline- and/or paclitaxel-based chemotherapy, platinum-based chemotherapy was more associated with improved DFS and OS in TNBC patients. The benefit of survival is consistent with platinum-based neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. The side effects of platinum-based chemotherapy are tolerable.
引用
收藏
页码:2025 / 2040
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of platinum-based chemotherapy on the prognosis of early triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhao, Fuxing
    Shen, Guoshuang
    Dong, Qiuxia
    Xin, Yuanfang
    Huo, Xingfa
    Wang, Miaozhou
    Liu, Zhen
    Zhao, Yi
    Ren, Dengfeng
    Xie, Qiqi
    Liu, Zhilin
    Li, Zitao
    Gao, Lihong
    Du, Feng
    Zhao, Jiuda
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2023, 23 (06) : 2025 - 2040
  • [2] Platinum-based chemotherapy for early triple-negative breast cancer: A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mason, Sofia
    Willson, Melina
    Goodwin, Annabel
    Beith, Jane
    Egger, Sam J.
    Dear, Rachel F.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 83 (05)
  • [3] Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Zhen-Yu
    Zhang, Zhen
    Cao, Xiao-Zhong
    Feng, Yun
    Ren, Sha-Sha
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 48 (10)
  • [4] Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Poggio, F.
    Bruzzone, M.
    Ceppi, M.
    Ponde, N. F.
    La Valle, G.
    Del Mastro, L.
    de Azambuja, E.
    Lambertini, M.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29 (07) : 1497 - 1508
  • [5] Platinum-based chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: A meta-analysis
    Liu, Miao
    Mo, Qin-Guo
    Wei, Chang-Yuan
    Qin, Qing-Hong
    Huang, Zhen
    He, Jie
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2013, 5 (03) : 983 - 991
  • [6] Platinum-based chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials
    Guan, Xiuwen
    Ma, Fei
    Fan, Ying
    Zhu, Wenjie
    Hong, Ruoxi
    Xu, Binghe
    ANTI-CANCER DRUGS, 2015, 26 (08) : 894 - 901
  • [7] Platinum-based chemotherapy for early triple-negative breast cancer
    Mason, Sofia R. E.
    Willsons, Melina L.
    Egger, Sam J.
    Beith, Jane
    Dear, Rachel F.
    Goodwin, Annabel
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2023, (09):
  • [8] Platinum-Based Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Indirect Treatment Comparison
    He, Qin
    Peng, Yicheng
    Sun, Jie
    Liu, Jianxia
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [9] Platinum-based chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer
    Sirohi, B.
    Arnedos, M.
    Popat, S.
    Ashley, S.
    Nerurkar, A.
    Walsh, G.
    Johnston, S.
    Smith, I. E.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2008, 19 (11) : 1847 - 1852
  • [10] Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Villarreal-Garza, C.
    Bouganim, N.
    Khalaf, D.
    Clemons, M.
    Kassam, F.
    Enright, K.
    Verma, S.
    Myers, J.
    Dent, R.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 71