Revealing Decision-Making Strategies of Americans in Taking COVID-19 Vaccination

被引:2
|
作者
Aghaeeyan, Azadeh [1 ]
Ramazi, Pouria [1 ]
Lewis, Mark A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Brock Univ, Dept Math & Stat, St Catharines, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Victoria, Dept Math & Stat, Victoria, BC, Canada
[3] Univ Victoria, Dept Biol, Victoria, BC, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Decision-making strategies; Imitation dynamics; Best-response dynamics; COVID-19; Vaccine uptake; PRODUCT DIFFUSION; IMITATORS; INFLUENTIALS; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1007/s11538-024-01290-4
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Efficient coverage for newly developed vaccines requires knowing which groups of individuals will accept the vaccine immediately and which will take longer to accept or never accept. Of those who may eventually accept the vaccine, there are two main types: success-based learners, basing their decisions on others' satisfaction, and myopic rationalists, attending to their own immediate perceived benefit. We used COVID-19 vaccination data to fit a mechanistic model capturing the distinct effects of the two types on the vaccination progress. We proved the identifiability of the population proportions of each type and estimated that 47%\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$47\%$$\end{document} of Americans behaved as myopic rationalists with a high variation across the jurisdictions, from 31%\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$31\%$$\end{document} in Mississippi to 76%\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$76\%$$\end{document} in Vermont. The proportion was correlated with the vaccination coverage, proportion of votes in favor of Democrats in 2020 presidential election, and education score.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy: ambiguity in decision-making
    Jones, Emma
    Neely, Eva
    [J]. HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 38 (06)
  • [2] COVID-19 Vaccination Decision-Making Approach and the Sentiments of Indian Citizens
    Chandel, Shubham
    Gochhait, Saikat
    [J]. 2022 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DECISION AID SCIENCES AND APPLICATIONS (DASA), 2022, : 275 - 279
  • [3] Perceived Influence of Incentives on COVID-19 Vaccination Decision-making and Trust
    Faherty, Laura J.
    Hunter, Gerald P.
    Holmes, Pierrce
    Ringel, Jeanne S.
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (05)
  • [4] Healthcare Professionals' Ethical Responsibility in COVID-19 Vaccination Decision-Making
    Zolkefli, Yusrita
    [J]. MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 29 (02): : 157 - 163
  • [5] Decision-Making in COVID-19 and Frailty
    Moug, Susan
    Carter, Ben
    Myint, Phyo Kyaw
    Hewitt, Jonathan
    McCarthy, Kathryn
    Pearce, Lyndsay
    [J]. GERIATRICS, 2020, 5 (02)
  • [6] Vaccination Double Bind: A Study of Pregnancy and COVID-19 Vaccine Decision-Making
    Campeau, Kari
    [J]. RHETORIC SOCIETY QUARTERLY, 2022, 52 (05) : 494 - 509
  • [7] Using motivational interviewing techniques to inform decision-making for COVID-19 vaccination
    Monica Zolezzi
    Bridget Paravattil
    Taysier El-Gaili
    [J]. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2021, 43 : 1728 - 1734
  • [8] Using motivational interviewing techniques to inform decision-making for COVID-19 vaccination
    Zolezzi, Monica
    Paravattil, Bridget
    El-Gaili, Taysier
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2021, 43 (06) : 1728 - 1734
  • [9] COVID-19: decision-making in public health
    de Caestecker, Linda
    von Wissmann, Beatrix
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF EDINBURGH, 2021, 51 : S26 - S32
  • [10] COVID-19 AND FAMILY LAW DECISION-MAKING
    Freckelton, Ian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW AND MEDICINE, 2020, 27 (04) : 846 - 855