A review on the state-of-the-art of physical/chemical and biological technologies for biogas upgrading

被引:0
|
作者
Raúl Muñoz
Leslie Meier
Israel Diaz
David Jeison
机构
[1] University of Valladolid,Department of Chemical Engineering and Environmental Technology
[2] University of La Frontera,Department of Chemical Engineering
关键词
Biomethane; Biotechnologies; Carbon dioxide removal; Hydrogen sulfide removal; Siloxane removal; Trace biogas contaminants;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The lack of tax incentives for biomethane use requires the optimization of both biogas production and upgrading in order to allow the full exploitation of this renewable energy source. The large number of biomethane contaminants present in biogas (CO2, H2S, H2O, N2, O2, methyl siloxanes, halocarbons) has resulted in complex sequences of upgrading processes based on conventional physical/chemical technologies capable of providing CH4 purities of 88–98 % and H2S, halocarbons and methyl siloxane removals >99 %. Unfortunately, the high consumption of energy and chemicals limits nowadays the environmental and economic sustainability of conventional biogas upgrading technologies. In this context, biotechnologies can offer a low cost and environmentally friendly alternative to physical/chemical biogas upgrading. Thus, biotechnologies such as H2-based chemoautrophic CO2 bioconversion to CH4, microalgae-based CO2 fixation, enzymatic CO2 dissolution, fermentative CO2 reduction and digestion with in situ CO2 desorption have consistently shown CO2 removals of 80–100 % and CH4 purities of 88–100 %, while allowing the conversion of CO2 into valuable bio-products and even a simultaneous H2S removal. Likewise, H2S removals >99 % are typically reported in aerobic and anoxic biotrickling filters, algal-bacterial photobioreactors and digesters under microaerophilic conditions. Even, methyl siloxanes and halocarbons are potentially subject to aerobic and anaerobic biodegradation. However, despite these promising results, most biotechnologies still require further optimization and scale-up in order to compete with their physical/chemical counterparts. This review critically presents and discusses the state of the art of biogas upgrading technologies with special emphasis on biotechnologies for CO2, H2S, siloxane and halocarbon removal.
引用
收藏
页码:727 / 759
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A review on the state-of-the-art of physical/chemical and biological technologies for biogas upgrading
    Munoz, Raul
    Meier, Leslie
    Diaz, Israel
    Jeison, David
    [J]. REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND BIO-TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 14 (04) : 727 - 759
  • [2] Biogas Upgrading Technologies: State of Art Review in European Region
    Niesner, Jakub
    Jecha, David
    Stehlik, Petr
    [J]. 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROCESS INTEGRATION, MODELLING AND OPTIMISATION FOR ENERGY SAVING AND POLLUTION REDUCTION (PRES'13), 2013, 35 : 517 - 522
  • [3] State-of-the-art assessment of cryogenic technologies for biogas upgrading: Energy, economic, and environmental perspectives
    Naquash, Ahmad
    Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul
    Haider, Junaid
    Bokhari, Awais
    Lim, Hankwon
    Lee, Moonyong
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 154
  • [4] A review on the state-of-the-art microforming technologies
    Fu, M. W.
    Chan, W. L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 67 (9-12): : 2411 - 2437
  • [5] A review on the state-of-the-art microforming technologies
    M. W. Fu
    W. L. Chan
    [J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2013, 67 : 2411 - 2437
  • [6] The State-of-the-art Technologies for Medical and Biological Imaging
    Lin, Feng
    Olivo, Malini
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SIGNAL PROCESSING SYSTEMS FOR SIGNAL IMAGE AND VIDEO TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 54 (1-3): : 1 - 6
  • [7] Technologies for Biogas Upgrading to Biomethane: A Review
    Adnan, Amir Izzuddin
    Ong, Mei Yin
    Nomanbhay, Saifuddin
    Chew, Kit Wayne
    Show, Pau Loke
    [J]. BIOENGINEERING-BASEL, 2019, 6 (04):
  • [8] Current Status of Biological Biogas Upgrading Technologies
    Lorant, Balint
    Tardy, Gabor Mark
    [J]. PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA-CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 66 (03) : 465 - 481
  • [9] A comparative analysis of biogas upgrading technologies: Photosynthetic vs physical/chemical processes
    Toledo-Cervantes, Alma
    Estrada, Jose M.
    Lebrero, Raquel
    Munoz, Raul
    [J]. ALGAL RESEARCH-BIOMASS BIOFUELS AND BIOPRODUCTS, 2017, 25 : 237 - 243
  • [10] Cloud Container Technologies: A State-of-the-Art Review
    Pahl, Claus
    Brogi, Antonio
    Soldani, Jacopo
    Jamshidi, Pooyan
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CLOUD COMPUTING, 2019, 7 (03) : 677 - 692