Empirical models for estimating global solar radiation in Wuhan City, China

被引:0
|
作者
Shaban G. Gouda
Zakia Hussein
Shuai Luo
Panpan Wang
Hongliang Cao
Qiaoxia Yuan
机构
[1] Huazhong Agricultural University,College of Engineering
[2] Benha University,Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Seven existing models and four proposed models were calibrated and evaluated to calculate the monthly average daily global solar radiation (GSR) on a horizontal surface in Wuhan city, China, using meteorological data measured from 2006 to 2011. The results show that the sunshine duration (n) is an important parameter for estimating the GSR and adding the dew point temperature (DP) is a significant effect in humid regions especially in Wuhan. Notably, all the tested models that used only the sunshine ratio or the sunshine ratio combined with other parameters exhibited satisfactory estimation performance. Adding the maximum and minimum air temperatures to the sunshine ratio in the Chen and Li model yielded a considerable improvement over the existing models, and adding the DP in the new model resulted in the most accurate estimations of solar radiation. Additionally, using the simple linear Ångström-Prescott model was better than using the more complex Bahel model or the Ododo model. Models based on the maximum, minimum and average air temperature (Li Huashan model) and DP (Li model) exhibited poor performance. The worst performance was displayed by the Badescu model, which uses only cloud cover as a key input. Finally, we propose a strategy for selecting the most appropriate model for estimating the GSR.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Empirical models for estimating global solar radiation in Wuhan City, China
    Gouda, Shaban G.
    Hussein, Zakia
    Luo, Shuai
    Wang, Panpan
    Cao, Hongliang
    Yuan, Qiaoxia
    [J]. EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL PLUS, 2018, 133 (12):
  • [2] Review of empirical solar radiation models for estimating global solar radiation of various climate zones of China
    Gouda, Shaban G.
    Hussein, Zakia
    Luo, Shuai
    Yuan, Qiaoxia
    [J]. PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY-EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 44 (02): : 168 - 188
  • [3] Empirical models for estimating the global solar radiation of Jubail Industrial City, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
    Sheik Mujabar
    Rao Chintaginjala Venkateswara
    [J]. SN Applied Sciences, 2021, 3
  • [4] Empirical models for estimating the global solar radiation of Jubail Industrial City, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
    Mujabar, Sheik
    Venkateswara, Rao Chintaginjala
    [J]. SN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2021, 3 (01):
  • [5] A comprehensive review of empirical models for estimating global solar radiation in Africa
    Chukwujindu, Nwokolo Samuel
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 78 : 955 - 995
  • [6] Empirical models for estimating global solar radiation: A review and case study
    Besharat, Fariba
    Dehghan, Ali A.
    Faghih, Ahmad R.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 21 : 798 - 821
  • [7] Empirical models for estimating daily global solar radiation in Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico
    Quej, Victor H.
    Almorox, Javier
    Ibrakhimov, Mirzakhayot
    Saito, Laurel
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 110 : 448 - 456
  • [8] Empirical models for estimating monthly global solar radiation: A most comprehensive review and comparative case study in China
    Chen, Ji-Long
    He, Lei
    Yang, Hong
    Ma, Maohua
    Chen, Qiao
    Wu, Sheng-Jun
    Xiao, Zuo-Lin
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 108 : 91 - 111
  • [9] General models for estimating daily global solar radiation for different solar radiation zones in mainland China
    Li, Mao-Fen
    Tang, Xiao-Ping
    Wu, Wei
    Liu, Hong-Bin
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 70 : 139 - 148
  • [10] The development of empirical models for estimating global solar radiation on horizontal surface: A case study
    Bayrakci, Hilmi Cenk
    Demircan, Cihan
    Kecebas, Ali
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 81 : 2771 - 2782