Model selection for prediction of strong ground motion peaks in Türkiye

被引:0
|
作者
Gökhan Altay
Cafer Kayadelen
Mehmet Kara
机构
[1] Osmaniye Korkut Ata University,Civil Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty
来源
Natural Hazards | 2024年 / 120卷
关键词
Artificial intelligence model selection; Gradient-boosted model (GBM); Peak ground acceleration (PGA); Peak ground displacement (PGD); Peak ground velocity (PGV);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study focuses on the model selection of peak ground acceleration (PGA), peak ground velocity (PGV), and peak ground displacement (PGD) prediction utilizing strong motion data of earthquakes that occurred in  Türkiye. An inventive gradient boosted model (GBM) predicted the PGA, PGV, and PGD using a database obtained from The Ministry of Interior Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency of Türkiye (AFAD). Alternative classification and decision tree models like K-Star algorithm, Sequential Minimal Optimization Regression (SMOreg), Random Forest (RF), and K-Nearest Neighbors (K-NN) were utilized to make comparisons with the results obtained from GBM. Furthermore, this comparison also includes the PGA prediction outcomes obtained through the use of the artificial neural network (ANN) technique. Earthquake magnitude (Mw), epicentral distance (Repi), focal depth (FD), and mean shear-wave velocity from the surface to a depth of 30 m (Vs30) were considered as independent input parameters. Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Schwartz Bayesian criterion (SBC) were employed to evaluate the prediction performance of all models. The results obtained from the GBM model were found to be better regarding PGA prediction than the other models. These results were revealed models to be a promising approach for the prediction of PGA, and capable of representing the complex relationship between predicted and input parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:1443 / 1461
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Model selection for prediction of strong ground motion peaks in Turkiye
    Altay, Gokhan
    Kayadelen, Cafer
    Kara, Mehmet
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2024, 120 (02) : 1443 - 1461
  • [2] Selection of Ground Motion Prediction Equations for the Global Earthquake Model
    Stewart, Jonathan P.
    Douglas, John
    Javanbarg, Mohammad
    Bozorgnia, Yousef
    Abrahamson, Norman A.
    Boore, David M.
    Campbell, Kenneth W.
    Delavaud, Elise
    Erdik, Mustafa
    Stafford, Peter J.
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2015, 31 (01) : 19 - 45
  • [3] Strong ground motion characteristics observed in the February 6, 2023 M W 7.7 Türkiye earthquake
    Wani, Faisal Mehraj
    Vemuri, Jayaprakash
    Rajaram, Chenna
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SCIENCE, 2024, 37 (03) : 241 - 262
  • [4] CORRELATION OF SEISMIC INTENSITY SCALES WITH PEAKS OF RECORDED STRONG GROUND MOTION
    TRIFUNAC, MD
    BRADY, AG
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1975, 65 (01) : 139 - 162
  • [5] Observation and prediction of strong ground motion in China
    Tao, XX
    Zhou, ZH
    Zhou, YN
    Wang, HY
    [J]. Directions in Strong Motion Instrumentation, 2005, 58 : 241 - 254
  • [6] The barrier model and strong ground motion
    Papageorgiou, AS
    [J]. PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2003, 160 (3-4) : 603 - 634
  • [7] The Barrier Model and Strong Ground Motion
    A. S. Papageorgiou
    [J]. pure and applied geophysics, 2003, 160 : 603 - 634
  • [8] Strong Ground Motion Prediction Using Virtual Earthquakes
    Denolle, M. A.
    Dunham, E. M.
    Prieto, G. A.
    Beroza, G. C.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2014, 343 (6169) : 399 - 403
  • [9] An updated strong-motion database of Türkiye (SMD-TR)
    Sandikkaya, M. Abdullah
    Guryuva, Baran
    Kale, Oezkan
    Okcu, Oguz
    Icen, Abdullah
    Yenier, Emrah
    Akkar, Sinan
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2024, 40 (01) : 847 - 870
  • [10] Characterization of the Heterogeneous Source Model of Intraslab Earthquakes Toward Strong Ground Motion Prediction
    Tomotaka Iwata
    Kimiyuki Asano
    [J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2011, 168 : 117 - 124