Logics that define their own semantics

被引:0
|
作者
H. Imhof
机构
[1] Institut für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik,
[2] Universität Freiburg,undefined
[3] Eckerstrasse 1,undefined
[4] D-79104 Freiburg,undefined
[5] Germany. e-mail: imhof@sun1.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de ,undefined
来源
关键词
Mathematical Logic; Model Check; Model Theory; Classical Result; Turing Machine;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The capability of logical systems to express their own satisfaction relation is a key issue in mathematical logic. Our notion of self definability is based on encodings of pairs of the type (structure, formula) into single structures wherein the two components can be clearly distinguished. Hence, the ambiguity between structures and formulas, forming the basis for many classical results, is avoided. We restrict ourselves to countable, regular, logics over finite vocabularies. Our main theorem states that self definability, in this framework, is equivalent to the existence of complete problems under quantifier free reductions. Whereas this holds true for arbitrary structures, we focus on examples from Finite Model Theory. Here, the theorem sheds a new light on nesting hierarchies for certain generalized quantifiers. They can be interpreted as failure of self definability in the according extensions of first order logic. As a further application we study the possibility of the existence of recursive logics for PTIME. We restate a result of Dawar concluding from recursive logics to complete problems. We show that for the model checking Turing machines associated with a recursive logic, it makes no difference whether or not they may use built in clocks.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 513
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Logics that define their own semantics
    Imhof, H
    [J]. ARCHIVE FOR MATHEMATICAL LOGIC, 1999, 38 (08) : 491 - 513
  • [2] SEMANTICS FOR TENSE LOGICS
    THOMASON, SK
    [J]. NOTICES OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY, 1971, 18 (07): : 1107 - &
  • [3] SEMANTICS FOR RELEVANT LOGICS
    URQUHART, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYMBOLIC LOGIC, 1972, 37 (01) : 159 - &
  • [4] Logics with Multiteam Semantics
    Graedel, Erich
    Wilke, Richard
    [J]. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL LOGIC, 2022, 23 (02)
  • [5] Nonmonotonic logics and semantics
    Lehmann, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND COMPUTATION, 2001, 11 (02) : 229 - 256
  • [6] Subintuitionistic Logics with Kripke Semantics
    de Jongh, Dick
    Maleki, Fatemeh Shirmohammadzadeh
    [J]. LOGIC, LANGUAGE, AND COMPUTATION (TBILLC 2015), 2017, 10148 : 333 - 354
  • [7] Logics admitting final semantics
    Kurz, A
    [J]. FOUNDATIONS OF SOFTWARE SCIENCE AND COMPUTATION STRUCTURES, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 2303 : 238 - 249
  • [8] Fibring logics with topos semantics
    Coniglio, ME
    Sernadas, AC
    Sernadas, CS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND COMPUTATION, 2003, 13 (04) : 595 - 624
  • [9] Matrix semantics for annotated logics
    Lewin, RA
    Mikenberg, IF
    Schwarze, MG
    [J]. MODELS, ALGEBRAS, AND PROOFS, 1999, 203 : 279 - 293
  • [10] Modular semantics and logics of classes
    Reus, B
    [J]. COMPUTER SCIENCE LOGIC, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 2803 : 456 - 469