A comparison between the Jordan and Einstein frames in Brans-Dicke theories with torsion

被引:0
|
作者
R. Gonzalez Quaglia
Gabriel Germán
机构
[1] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México,Instituto de Ciencias Físicas
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In recent years, gravitational models motivated by quantum corrections to gravity which introduce higher order terms like R2\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$R^{2}$$\end{document} or terms in which the Riemann tensor is not symmetric have been studied by several authors in the form of a general Brans-Dicke type model containing the Ricci scalar, the Holst term and the Nieh-Yan invariant. In this paper we focus on the less explored Jordan frame of such theories and in the comparison between both this frame and the Einstein one. Furthermore, we discuss the role of the transformation of the torsion under conformal transformations and show that the transformation proposed in this paper (extended conformal transformation) contains a special case of the projective transformation of the connection used in some of the papers that motivated this work. We discuss the role and advantages of the extended conformal transformation and show that this new approach can have interesting consequences by working with different variables such as the metric and torsion. Moreover, we study the stability of the system via a dynamical analysis in the Jordan frame, this in order to analyze whether or not we have the fixed points that can be later identified as the inflationary attractor and the unstable fixed point where inflation could take place. Finally we study the scale invariant case of the general model in the Jordan frame. We find out that both the scalar spectral index and the tensor-to-scalar ratio are in agreement with the latest Planck results.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison between the Jordan and Einstein frames in Brans-Dicke theories with torsion
    Quaglia, R. Gonzalezy
    German, Gabriel
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL PLUS, 2023, 138 (01):
  • [2] Brans-Dicke wormholes in the Jordan and Einstein frames
    Nandi, KK
    Bhattacharjee, B
    Alam, SMK
    Evans, J
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 1998, 57 (02) : 823 - 828
  • [3] Brans-Dicke wormholes in the Jordan and Einstein frames
    Nandi, K. K.
    Bhattacharjee, B.
    Alam, S. M. K.
    Evans, J.
    Physical Review D Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, 57 (02):
  • [4] Comment on "Brans-Dicke wormholes in the Jordan and Einstein frames"
    Bloomfield, PE
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 1999, 59 (08):
  • [5] Reply to "Comment on 'Brans-Dicke, wormholes in the Jordan and Einstein frames'"
    Nandi, KK
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 1999, 59 (08):
  • [6] Comparison between Jordan and Einstein frames of Brans-Dicke gravity a la loop quantum cosmology
    Artymowski, Michal
    Ma, Yongge
    Zhang, Xiangdong
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2013, 88 (10)
  • [7] Quantum Cosmological Scenarios of Brans-Dicke Gravity in Einstein and Jordan Frames
    Almeida, C. R.
    Batista, A. B.
    Fabris, J. C.
    Pinto-Neto, N.
    GRAVITATION & COSMOLOGY, 2018, 24 (03): : 245 - 253
  • [8] Quantum Cosmological Scenarios of Brans-Dicke Gravity in Einstein and Jordan Frames
    C. R. Almeida
    A. B. Batista
    J. C. Fabris
    N. Pinto-Neto
    Gravitation and Cosmology, 2018, 24 : 245 - 253
  • [9] Jordan and Einstein Frames Hamiltonian Analysis for FLRW Brans-Dicke Theory
    Galaverni, Matteo
    Gionti S. J., Gabriele
    UNIVERSE, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [10] Canonical analysis of Brans-Dicke theory addresses Hamiltonian inequivalence between the Jordan and Einstein frames
    Gionti, Gabriele S. J.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2021, 103 (02)