Determining the benefits and drawbacks of parents using personal connections and social networks for recruitment in research projects: a qualitative study

被引:0
|
作者
Kim L. [1 ]
Costello C. [2 ]
Golding M.A. [2 ,3 ]
Janse van Rensburg C. [2 ,3 ]
Protudjer J.L.P. [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Wittmeier K. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Family Liaison, BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute, 938 W 28th Ave, Vancouver, V5Z 4H4, BC
[2] Children’s Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, 715 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, R3E 3P4, MB
[3] Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
[4] Department of Food and Human Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
[5] George and Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, Winnipeg, MB
[6] Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
关键词
Community networks; Parent partnership; Parents; Patient partner; Patient-oriented research; Qualitative research; Recruitment; Risks & benefits;
D O I
10.1186/s40900-023-00470-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: It is becoming more common for parents of children with chronic conditions to join research teams as partners. Parent partnerships can help align research with what is relevant and important to families. It is also common for parent partners to be asked to share information about a study through their personal networks, which supports study recruitment. In this parent-led study, we explored parents' experiences when working together with researchers in patient-oriented research studies, in relation to study recruitment. Methods: Demographic data were collected through a brief online survey (SurveyMonkey®) and analysed descriptively (n, %, median (interquartile range; IQR)). Qualitative data were collected through focus groups and interviews (July to October 2021), transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically. Parent co-leads were involved in every stage of the study, including study design, recruitment, data collection, analysis, interpretation, and knowledge mobilization. Results: Fifteen parents (n = 14 women) who had research partnership experience participated in this study. Most (n = 13) participants self-identified as White or of European descent. The majority (n = 10) had partnered in 1–3 research projects, while five participants had partnered in 4 + projects. Parents had a median of 3 years (IQR: 5) of partnership experience. We identified the following three themes: motivations, authentic partnerships, and learned decision making. Each theme included reflections about recruitment, and about research partnership in general. Motivations included a personal connection to the research topic, a connection to the community impacted by the research topic, and a desire to create change. Authentic partnerships were important for a meaningful experience, and enhanced participant’s willingness and ability to share study materials. Learned decision making reflected parents’ evolving decisions and practices related to sharing study information or personal information to support research. We provide a summary of participants’ recommendations for researchers who work with parent partners, and recommendations for parents as they approach research partnerships. Conclusions: Experiences shared by parents who have partnered in research provide valuable information to inform recruitment methods and improve team functioning. Parent partners expressed a willingness to support recruitment and valued a strong research team working together for a common outcome. This study yields a set of recommendations guiding future research that engages parents as team members. © 2023, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] The interaction of personal, contextual, and study characteristics and their effect on recruitment and participation of pregnant women in research: a qualitative study in Lebanon
    Ayoub, Jennifer J.
    Abiad, May
    Forman, Michele R.
    Honein-AbouHaidar, Gladys
    Naja, Farah
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2018, 18
  • [2] The interaction of personal, contextual, and study characteristics and their effect on recruitment and participation of pregnant women in research: a qualitative study in Lebanon
    Jennifer J. Ayoub
    May Abiad
    Michele R. Forman
    Gladys Honein-AbouHaidar
    Farah Naja
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18
  • [3] User-focused research to identify the benefits of digital tools for the recruitment and retention in trials: A qualitative study
    Blatch-Jones, Amanda Jane
    Bull, Abby
    Nuttall, Jacqui
    Griffiths, Gareth
    Wyatt, Jeremy
    [J]. TRIALS, 2019, 20
  • [4] Personal Social Networks and Care-Seeking for Head and Neck Cancer: A Qualitative Study
    Batool, Sana
    Hansen, Elisabeth E.
    Sethi, Rosh K. V.
    Rettig, Eleni M.
    Goguen, Laura A.
    Annino, Donald
    Uppaluri, Ravindra
    Edwards, Heather A.
    Faden, Daniel L.
    Dohan, Daniel
    Dhand, Amar
    Reich, Amanda J.
    Bergmark, Regan W.
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2024, 170 (02) : 457 - 467
  • [5] Making meaning of meaning-making research: Using qualitative research for studies of social and personal relationships
    Manning, Jimmie
    Kunkel, Adrianne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2014, 31 (04) : 433 - 441
  • [6] How is the effect of social media on intention to outdoor recreations? A study using personal social connections as a moderator
    Hung, Wei-Tien
    Liou, Gwo-Bao
    [J]. HELIYON, 2023, 9 (11)
  • [7] What do parents think of using informational videos to support recruitment for parenting trials? A qualitative study
    Pontoppidan, Maiken
    Blower, Sarah
    Solvang, Julie Nygaard
    Bywater, Tracey
    [J]. TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [8] What do parents think of using informational videos to support recruitment for parenting trials? A qualitative study
    Maiken Pontoppidan
    Sarah Blower
    Julie Nygaard Solvang
    Tracey Bywater
    [J]. Trials, 22
  • [9] THE CHARACTERISTICS OF PERSONAL SOCIAL NETWORKS OF BREAST CANCER PATIENTS IN SOUTHERN THAILAND: A QUALITATIVE CASE STUDY
    Purinthrapibal, Shutiwan
    Boddy, Julie
    Batten, Lesley
    Nilmanat, Kittikorn
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 8 : 294 - 294
  • [10] Using qualitative research methods to improve recruitment to randomized controlled trials: the Quartet study
    de Salis, Isabel
    Tomlin, Zelda
    Toerien, Merran
    Donovan, Jenny
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH & POLICY, 2008, 13 : 92 - 96