Response to Protocol Review Scenario: The details are what matter

被引：0

作者：

Robert H. Schmidt

Aaron L. Olsen

机构：

[1] Logan,Schmidt is an Associate Professor in the Department of Environment and Society

[2] UT.,undefined

[3] Olsen is Director of the Laboratory Animal Research Center and a Clinical Assistant Professor in the School of Veterinary Medicine at Utah State University,undefined

[4] Logan,undefined

[5] UT.,undefined

来源：

Lab Animal | 2016年 / 45卷 / 3期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1038/laban.951

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

引用

页码：96 / 97

页数：1

共 50 条

[1] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: The devil is in the details
Steven M. Kuhlman
Caroline A. Azrolan
[J]. Lab Animal, 2015, 44 (10) : 380 - 381
[2] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Details missing
Greg Stickrod
Doug Miller
[J]. Lab Animal, 2005, 34 (4) : 23 - 24
[3] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: A matter of interpretation
Kimberly A. Overhulse
Monica Chiotti
Sara E. Overhulse
[J]. Lab Animal, 2016, 45 (9) : 329 - 329
[4] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: What is the Real Issue?
Pete C. Willan
[J]. Lab Animal, 2003, 32 (8) : 18 - 19
[5] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: What's right?
Yolanda P. Villarreal Acosta
[J]. Lab Animal, 2014, 43 (10) : 348 - 348
[6] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Out of luck, but what if?
Brad Williams
[J]. Lab Animal, 2007, 36 (8) : 15 - 15
[7] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: What's the Real Problem Here?
Gwendalyn M. Maginnis
[J]. Lab Animal, 2003, 32 (5) : 19 - 20
[8] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Not in the protocol, not approved
Austin Fritsch
[J]. Lab Animal, 2015, 44 (8) : 296 - 296
[9] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Protocol is acceptable
Mary Ellen Goldberg
[J]. Lab Animal, 2015, 44 (6) : 204 - 205
[10] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Not so simple a scenario
Ellen J. Croxford
[J]. Lab Animal, 2018, 47 (1) : 9 - 10

← 1 2 3 4 5 →