Laboratory evaluation of surface amendments for controlling greenhouse gas emissions from beef cattle feedlots

被引:0
|
作者
Aguilar O.A. [1 ]
Maghirang R. [2 ]
Trabue S.L. [3 ]
Rice C.W. [4 ]
Erickson L.E. [5 ]
机构
[1] Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technological University of Panama, Panama
[2] Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Kansas State University, Manhattan
[3] USDA Agricultural Research Service, National Laboratory of Agriculture and the Environment, Ames
[4] Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan
[5] Department of Chemical Engineering, Kansas State University, Manhattan
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Biochar; Feedlot emission; Greenhouse gas control; Greenhouse gas emission; Organic residue; Surface amendment;
D O I
10.1186/2251-6832-4-41
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Pen surface amendments for mitigating emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs), such as nitrous oxide (N2O), methane (CH4), and carbon dioxide (CO2), from beef cattle feedlots, were evaluated under controlled laboratory conditions. Amendments were organic residues (i.e., sorghum straw, prairie grass, woodchip), biochar from those organic residues and from beef cattle manure, and activated carbon. Manure samples were collected from several randomly selected pens from two beef cattle feedlots in Kansas and used in the experiments, either as dry (0.10 g · g-1 wet basis water content) or moist (0.35 g · g-1 wet basis). For each amendment, four different treatment levels (i.e., amounts of material) were placed on top of manure samples in glass containers and analyzed for GHG emissions using a photo-acoustic infrared multi-gas analyzer. From measured concentrations, emission rates were determined. For the dry manure conditions, all amendment materials showed significant reduction of N2O and CO2 emissions compared to the control (i.e., no amendment). For the moist manure conditions, none of the amendments showed significant effects on GHG emissions during the first 8 days; at days 10 and 15 after application, however, the biochar materials performed significantly better than the control (i.e., no surface amendment) in reducing N2O and CH4 emissions. No significant difference was observed in GHG emissions when the amendments were placed on top or mixed within the top surface layer of the manure. © 2013 Aguilar et al.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Surface amendments to minimize ammonia emissions from beef cattle feedlots
    Shi, Y
    Parker, DB
    Cole, NA
    Auvermann, BW
    Mehlhorn, JE
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 2001, 44 (03): : 677 - 682
  • [2] Ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions at beef cattle feedlots in Alberta Canada
    McGinn, S. M.
    Flesch, T. K.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2018, 258 : 43 - 49
  • [3] Experimental research on the effects of water application on greenhouse gas emissions from beef cattle feedlots
    Aguilar O.A.
    Maghirang R.
    Trabue S.L.
    Erickson L.E.
    [J]. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 2014, 5 (2-3) : 1 - 12
  • [4] Simulation and Prediction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Beef Cattle
    Chen, Xiao
    Tao, Tao
    Zhou, Jiaxin
    Yu, Helong
    Guo, Hongliang
    Chen, Hongbing
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (15)
  • [5] Emissions of the indirect greenhouse gases NH3 and NOx from Australian beef cattle feedlots
    Denmead, O. T.
    Chen, D.
    Griffith, D. W. T.
    Loh, Z. M.
    Bai, M.
    Naylor, T.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2008, 48 (1-2): : 213 - 218
  • [6] Reactive N emissions from beef cattle feedlots.
    Todd, R. W.
    Waldrip, H. M.
    Parker, D. B.
    Cole, N. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 : 621 - 622
  • [7] Evaluation of Aluminum Sulfate (Alum) As a Feedlot Surface Amendment to Reduce Ammonia, Hydrogen Sulfide, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Beef Feedlots.
    Duncan, Z.
    Spiehs, M. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2018, 96 : 251 - 252
  • [8] Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from beef cattle production systems
    Samsonstuen, Stine
    Aby, Bente A.
    Crosson, Paul
    Beauchemin, Karen A.
    Aass, Laila
    [J]. ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 69 (04): : 220 - 232
  • [9] Resource use and greenhouse gas emissions from grain-finishing beef cattle in seven Australian feedlots: a life cycle assessment
    Wiedemann, Stephen
    Davis, Rod
    McGahan, Eugene
    Murphy, Caoilinn
    Redding, Matthew
    [J]. ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2017, 57 (06) : 1149 - 1162
  • [10] Greenhouse gas emissions from beef cattle pen surfaces in North Dakota
    Rahman, Shafiqur
    Borhan, Md Saidul
    Swanson, Kendall
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 34 (10) : 1239 - 1246