Peer reviewers could do much better

被引：0

作者：

Simon Wain-Hobson

机构：

[1] Institut Pasteur,Unité de Rétrovirologie Moléculaire

来源：

Nature | 1997年 / 385卷

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

引用

页码：384 / 384

共 50 条

[1] Peer reviewers could do much better
WainHobson, S
[J]. NATURE, 1997, 385 (6615) : 384 - 384
[2] COULD DO BETTER, MUCH BETTER
不详
[J]. MANUFACTURING CHEMIST, 1991, 62 (11): : 3 - 3
[3] WHO ARE THE PEER REVIEWERS AND HOW MUCH DO THEY REVIEW
YANKAUER, A
[J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 263 (10): : 1338 - 1340
[4] End of year report - could do better, much better
Sim, F.
Mackie, P.
[J]. PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 122 (12) : 1293 - 1294
[5] BRITISH RESEARCH POLICY - COULD DO MUCH BETTER
BEARDSLEY, T
[J]. NATURE, 1982, 300 (5894) : 676 - 676
[6] Building Better Peer Reviewers
Olena, Abby
[J]. SCIENTIST, 2018, 32 (02): : 60 - 62
[7] We Could Do Much Better With the Clinical Theory of Psychoanalysis
Bornstein, Melvin
[J]. PSYCHOANALYTIC INQUIRY, 2012, 32 (01) : 69 - 78
[8] WHAT DO PEER REVIEWERS DO
LOCK, S
SMITH, J
[J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 263 (10): : 1341 - 1343
[9] It could all be so much better
Holderness, Mike
Nelson, Ted
[J]. NEW SCIENTIST, 2006, 191 (2569) : 54 - 55
[10] We Could Be So Much Better
Murray, Yxta Maya
[J]. ARTFORUM INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 58 (05): : 220 - 221