Energy innovation funding and institutions in major economies

被引:0
|
作者
Jonas Meckling
Clara Galeazzi
Esther Shears
Tong Xu
Laura Diaz Anadon
机构
[1] University of California,Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management
[2] Berkeley,Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
[3] Harvard University,Centre for Environment, Energy and Natural Resource Governance, Department of Land Economy
[4] University of Cambridge,Energy and Resources Group
[5] University of California,Department of Economics
[6] Berkeley,Institute of Urban Environment
[7] University of Bologna,undefined
[8] Chinese Academy of Sciences,undefined
来源
Nature Energy | 2022年 / 7卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Accelerating energy innovation for decarbonization hinges on public investment in research, development and demonstration (RD&D). Here we examine the evolution and variation of public energy RD&D funding and institutions and associated drivers across eight major economies, including China and India (2000–2018). The share of new clean energy grew at the expense of nuclear, while the fossil fuel RD&D share remained stable. Governments created new institutions but experimented only marginally with novel designs that bridge lab to market to accelerate commercialization. In theory, crisis, cooperation and competition can be drivers of change. We find that cooperation in Mission Innovation is associated with punctuated change in clean-energy RD&D growth, and clean tech competition with China is associated with gradual change. Stimulus spending after the financial crisis, instead, boosted fossil and nuclear only. Looking ahead, global coopetition—the interplay of RD&D cooperation and clean tech competition—offers opportunities for accelerating energy innovation to meet climate goals.
引用
收藏
页码:876 / 885
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Energy innovation funding and institutions in major economies
    Meckling, Jonas
    Galeazzi, Clara
    Shears, Esther
    Xu, Tong
    Anadon, Laura Diaz
    [J]. NATURE ENERGY, 2022, 7 (09) : 876 - 885
  • [2] EVALUATION OF INSTITUTIONS IN INNOVATION-DRIVEN ECONOMIES
    Vitola, Alise
    Senfelde, Maija
    [J]. ECONOMIC SCIENCE FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT: 1. MARKETING AND SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION 2. NEW DIMENSIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIETY, 2015, (40): : 94 - 103
  • [3] FUNDING TECHNICAL INNOVATION IN ENERGY EFFICIENCY
    不详
    [J]. GLASS TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 36 (02): : 38 - 38
  • [4] Why basic energy sciences is funding innovation
    Smith, JJ
    [J]. FUTURE GENERATION PHOTOVOLTAIC TECHNOLOGIES, 1997, (404): : 73 - 84
  • [5] Unravelling the innovation puzzle: The interplay between uncertainty, economic institutions, and innovation performance in advanced and developing economies
    Kafka, Kyriaki I.
    Kostis, Pantelis C.
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2024, 198
  • [6] Home country institutions and exports of firms in transition economies: Does innovation matter?
    Hernandez, Virginia
    Jesus Nieto, Maria
    Rodriguez, Alicia
    [J]. LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2022, 55 (01)
  • [7] Globalizing Innovation. State Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment in Emerging Economies
    Quiroz Morales, Omar Hiram
    [J]. FORO INTERNACIONAL, 2018, 58 (03) : 611 - 612
  • [8] Network centrality and innovation performance: the role of formal and informal institutions in emerging economies
    Wang, Haifeng
    Zhao, Yapu
    Dang, Beilei
    Han, Pengfei
    Shi, Xin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, 2019, 34 (06) : 1388 - 1400
  • [9] FUNDING OF INNOVATION
    LINDLEY, BC
    [J]. RADIO AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEER, 1971, 41 (12): : S183 - &
  • [10] Funding for innovation
    不详
    [J]. NUTRITION & FOOD SCIENCE, 2009, 39 (04): : 25 - 28