Assessment of AquaCrop Model in Simulating Sugar Beet Canopy Cover, Biomass and Root Yield under Different Irrigation and Field Management Practices in Semi-Arid Regions of Pakistan

被引:0
|
作者
Abdul Malik
Abdul Sattar Shakir
Muhammad Ajmal
Muhammad Jamal Khan
Taj Ali Khan
机构
[1] University of Engineering & Technology,Agricultural Engineering Department
[2] University of Engineering & Technology,Civil Engineering Department
[3] Agricultural University Peshawar,Water Management Department
来源
关键词
AquaCrop; Deficit irrigation; Mulches; Water management strategies; Canopy cover; Biomass; Root yield; Sugar beet;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The AquaCrop model was analyzed for simulating sugar beet crop production under four irrigation regimes, three mulching conditions and three furrow irrigation systems in semi-arid region of Pakistan. Irrigation regimes were full irrigation (FI), 20% deficit irrigation (DI20), 40% deficit irrigation (DI40) and 60% deficit irrigation (DI60). The mulching practices were No-mulch (NM), black film mulch (BFM) and straw mulch (SM). The furrow irrigation systems were conventional ridge-furrow (CRF) system, medium raised-bed (MRB) system and wide raised-bed (WRB) system. The model was calibrated and validated using the independent data sets of full irrigation and deficit irrigation regimes collected during 2011–12 cropping season. The model performance was evaluated by using different statistical indicators such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), index of agreement (dindex), and Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE). These indicators showed that the model fairly simulated sugar beet canopy cover for all treatments with 3.00 ≤ RMSE ≤ 16.89, 0.84 ≤ dindex ≤ 0.97, and 0.76 ≤ NSE ≤ 0.99. For biomass and root yield, the model performance was excellent under all full irrigation (FI) and mild deficit irrigation (DI20) treatments with RMSE ranged between 0.07 and 1.17, dindex between 0.48 and 0.84, and NSE between 0.42 and 0.86, respectively. However the low values of dindex (0.10 and 0.13) and NSE (−69.32 and −30.63) showed that the model overestimated both the biomass and root yield when 20% deficit irrigation was applied without mulch in WRB system. The model also over estimated the yield and biomass when 40% deficit irrigation was applied in CRF system. The highest overestimation (dindex: 0.10 to 0.11; NSE: −50.92 to −70.55) was observed when highest stress level (DI60) was applied in the presence of BFM in CRF system. Based on the model’s overall performance, the AquaCrop application is recommended for developing efficient farm water management strategies in the semi-arid regions.
引用
收藏
页码:4275 / 4292
页数:17
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Assessment of AquaCrop Model in Simulating Sugar Beet Canopy Cover, Biomass and Root Yield under Different Irrigation and Field Management Practices in Semi-Arid Regions of Pakistan
    Malik, Abdul
    Shakir, Abdul Sattar
    Ajmal, Muhammad
    Khan, Muhammad Jamal
    Khan, Taj Ali
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2017, 31 (13) : 4275 - 4292
  • [2] Evaluation of the AquaCrop Model for Simulating Cotton Yield Under a Semi-Arid Environment and Different Field Management Practices
    Nasrabad, Ghorban Ghorbani
    Abedinpour, Meysam
    Hazarjaribi, Abotaleb
    [J]. PHILIPPINE AGRICULTURAL SCIENTIST, 2024, 107 (01): : 29 - 38
  • [3] Assessment of the AquaCrop Model for Simulating Maize Response to Different Nitrogen Stresses under Semi-arid Climate
    Ranjbar, Arash
    Rahimikhoob, Ali
    Ebrahimian, Hamed
    Varavipour, Maryam
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2019, 50 (22) : 2899 - 2912
  • [4] Nutrients management strategies to improve yield and quality of sugar beet in semi-arid regions
    Ahmad, Irshad
    Ahmad, Bashir
    Ali, Shahzad
    Kamran, Muhammad
    Fang, Han Qing
    Bilegjargal, Bayasgalan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 2017, 40 (15) : 2109 - 2115
  • [5] Simulating Cotton Growth and Productivity Using AquaCrop Model under Deficit Irrigation in a Semi-Arid Climate
    Aziz, Marjan
    Rizvi, Sultan Ahmad
    Sultan, Muhammad
    Bazmi, Muhammad Sultan Ali
    Shamshiri, Redmond R.
    Ibrahim, Sobhy M.
    Imran, Muhammad A.
    [J]. AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [6] EVALUATION OF CANOPY TEMPERATURE BASED CROP WATER STRESS INDEX FOR DEFICIT IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT OF SUGAR BEET IN SEMI-ARID CLIMATE
    King, Bradley A.
    Tarkalson, David Dale
    Bjorneberg, David
    [J]. APPLIED ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE, 2024, 40 (01) : 95 - 110
  • [7] MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ASSESSMENT USING AQUACROP MODEL FOR GROWING BARLEY UNDER SALINE CONDITIONS OF THE ARID REGIONS OF TUNISIA
    El Mokh, F.
    Nagaz, K.
    Masmoudi, M. M.
    Mechlia, N. B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND PLANT SCIENCES-JAPS, 2022, 32 (04): : 1053 - 1061
  • [8] Modeling Sugar Beet Response to Different Combinations of On-Farm Water Management Practices Under Semi-arid Sub-tropical Environment
    Malik, Abdul
    Shakir, Abdul Sattar
    Khan, Muhammad Jamal
    Ajmal, Muhammad
    Khattak, Muhammad Shahzad
    Khan, Taj Ali
    Ul Haq, Zia
    Khan, Mahmood Alam
    Ijaz, Naeem
    [J]. SUGAR TECH, 2019, 21 (01) : 122 - 134
  • [9] Modeling Sugar Beet Response to Different Combinations of On-Farm Water Management Practices Under Semi-arid Sub-tropical Environment
    Abdul Malik
    Abdul Sattar Shakir
    Muhammad Jamal Khan
    Muhammad Ajmal
    Muhammad Shahzad Khattak
    Taj Ali Khan
    Zia Ul Haq
    Mahmood Alam Khan
    Naeem Ijaz
    [J]. Sugar Tech, 2019, 21 : 122 - 134
  • [10] Calibration and validation of the AquaCrop model for forage cactus production systems under different management interventions in the semi-arid region of Brazil
    da Costa, Sidney Anderson Teixeira
    de Souza, Luciana Sandra Bastos
    Montenegro, Abelardo Antonio de Assuncao
    de Souza, Carlos Andre Alves
    de Morais, Jose Edson Florentino
    Lopes, Daniela de Carvalho
    Steidle Neto, Antonio Jose
    Santos, Joao Pedro Alves de Souza
    Jardim, Alexandre Manicoba da Rosa Ferraz
    Alves, Cleber Pereira
    da Silva, Marcos Vinicius
    da Silva, Thieres George Freire
    [J]. PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2024, 136