Standards-based evaluation and teacher career satisfaction: A structural equation modeling analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Conley S. [1 ]
Muncey D.E. [2 ]
You S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Education, University of California-Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara
[2] Santa Monica, CA, Santa Monica Unified School District
[3] University of California-Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA
来源
关键词
Career Satisfaction; Standards-based evaluation;
D O I
10.1007/s11092-006-9008-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Structural equation modeling was used to assess the plausibility of a conceptual model specifying hypothesized linkages among perceptions of characteristics of standards-based evaluation, work environment mediators, and career satisfaction and other outcomes. Four comprehensive high schools located in two neighboring counties in southern California provided the data for this study. The schools' districts had recently developed and implemented evaluation systems based on six California Standards for the Teaching Profession generated in 1997. One hundred and seventy-eight teachers responded to survey questions designed to capture the following constructs: understandable/relevant standards, satisfactory/helpful evaluation, role ambiguity, effort performance-rating linkage, work criteria autonomy, career satisfaction, organizational commitment, and perceptions of the effectiveness of the evaluation system. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess whether the items measuring evaluation fit two hypothesized constructs. Structural equation modeling results indicated that there are two mediators in the evaluation-career satisfaction relationship: role ambiguity and work criteria autonomy.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 65
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Continuing Assessment of Teacher Reactions to a Standards-Based Teacher Evaluation System
    Herbert G. Heneman
    Anthony T. Milanowski
    [J]. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 2003, 17 (2): : 173 - 195
  • [2] Assessment of teacher reactions to a standards-based teacher evaluation system: A pilot study
    Milanowski A.T.
    Heneman III H.G.
    [J]. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 2001, 15 (3): : 193 - 212
  • [3] Teacher Learning and Standards-Based Instruction
    Knight, Stephanie L.
    Lloyd, Gwendolyn M.
    Arbaugh, Fran
    Edmondson, Jacqueline
    McDonald, Scott P.
    Nolan, James, Jr.
    Whitney, Anne Elrod
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 2013, 64 (03) : 200 - 201
  • [4] Autonomous boards and standards-based teacher development
    Scannell, MM
    Metcalf, PL
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL POLICY, 2000, 14 (01) : 61 - 76
  • [5] Teacher and Administrator Responses to Standards-Based Reform
    Desimone, Laura M.
    [J]. TEACHERS COLLEGE RECORD, 2013, 115 (08):
  • [6] Standards-Based and Responsive Evaluation
    Stevens, Martin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW, 2005, 27 (02) : 227 - 230
  • [7] Standards-based and responsive evaluation
    Brett, B
    [J]. EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2005, 28 (01) : 119 - 120
  • [8] Criterion-Related Validity Evidence for a Standards-Based Teacher Evaluation System
    Elizabeth Holtzapple
    [J]. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 2003, 17 (3): : 207 - 219
  • [9] Examining Teacher Evaluation Validity and Leadership Decision Making Within a Standards-Based Evaluation System
    Kimball, Steven M.
    Milanowski, Anthony
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION QUARTERLY, 2009, 45 (01) : 34 - 70
  • [10] Standards-based and responsive evaluation.
    Mäder, S
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVALUATION, 2005, (02): : 343 - 344