Imaging Biomarker Applications in Oncology Drug Development

被引:0
|
作者
Janet C. Miller
Homer H. Pien
A. Gregory Sorensen
机构
[1] Center for Biomarkers in Imaging,
[2] Department of Radiology,undefined
[3] Massachusetts General Hospital,undefined
[4] Center for Biomarkers in Imaging,undefined
[5] Department of Radiology,undefined
[6] Massachusetts General Hospital,undefined
关键词
Imaging; Biomarker; Cancer; Drug development; Clinical trial;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
At present, drug development is a long and costly process with an unacceptably high failure rate. As a result, both the Food and Drug Administration and the pharmaceutical industry have shown interest in using biomarkers of clinical response. Biomarker imaging is noninvasive, allows serial data collection, and lessens interpatient variability because each individual can serve as his or her own control. The only imaging biomarker currently accepted as a surrogate for clinical response is tumor shrinkage for accelerated approval. The imaging biomarker,18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) and positron emission tomography (PET), is widely used clinically to assess response to therapy and, in some cases, correlates better with prolonged survival than tumor shrinkage. Other biomarkers, such as hemodynamic biomarkers, have been used in early clinical trials as a means to assess bioactivity within hours or days of the start of treatment and to determine drug dose in subsequent trials. Many others have found applications in assessing bioactivity in preclinical stages of drug development. With further validation, many of these imaging biomarkers could become valuable in measuring response to therapy much faster than present methods. In addition, pharmacokinetic imaging will provide both clinical and preclinical data on uptake, distribution, and excretion of drug candidates.
引用
收藏
页码:561 / 572
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Imaging biomarker applications in oncology drug development
    Miller, Janet C.
    Pien, Homer H.
    Sorensen, A. Gregory
    [J]. DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 2007, 41 (05): : 561 - 572
  • [2] Impact of biomarker usage on oncology drug development
    Hayashi, K.
    Masuda, S.
    Kimura, H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2013, 38 (01) : 62 - 67
  • [3] Strategies for modern biomarker and drug development in oncology
    Alan D Smith
    Desam Roda
    Timothy A Yap
    [J]. Journal of Hematology & Oncology, 7
  • [4] Strategies for modern biomarker and drug development in oncology
    Smith, Alan D.
    Roda, Desam
    Yap, Timothy A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY, 2014, 7
  • [5] Implementation of a biomarker into drug development: Example of identifying the right Imaging "Tool" for an oncology study
    Peterson, Barry T.
    McCarthy, Timothy. J.
    Murphy, Philip
    [J]. DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 2007, 41 (05): : 555 - 560
  • [6] Apparent diffusion coefficient from magnetic resonance imaging as a biomarker in oncology drug development
    Sinkus, Ralph
    Van Beers, Bernard E.
    Vilgrain, Valerie
    DeSouza, Nandita
    Waterton, John C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 (04) : 425 - 431
  • [7] Implementation of a Biomarker into Drug Development: Example of Identifying the Right Imaging “Tool” for an Oncology Study
    Barry T. Peterson
    Timothy J. McCarthy
    Philip Murphy
    [J]. Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association, 2007, 41 : 555 - 560
  • [8] Imaging drug pharmacokinetics in oncology drug development
    Price, P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2009, 36 : S158 - S158
  • [9] Molecular imaging in oncology drug development
    Mudd, Sarah R.
    Comley, Robert A.
    Bergstrom, Mats
    Holen, Kyle D.
    Luo, Yanping
    Carme, Sabin
    Fox, Gerard B.
    Martarello, Laurent
    Beaver, John D.
    [J]. DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2017, 22 (01) : 140 - 147
  • [10] Molecular imaging for oncology drug development
    Price, P.
    [J]. EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2005, 3 (02): : 17 - 17