Prospective ongoing prescribing error feedback to enhance safety: a randomised controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
Gordon M. [1 ,2 ]
Jones H. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Families Division, Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackpool
[2] School of Medicine, University of Central Lancashire, Harrington Building HA118, Preston
[3] Pharmacy Department, Blackpool Victoria Hospital, Blackpool
[4] School of Pharmacy, University of Central Lancashire, Preston
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s40267-017-0412-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Prescribing errors are one of the most common adverse events in healthcare. Previous research in patient safety has highlighted the importance of error awareness education to enhance professional attitudes and reduce errors. Previously researched systems of contemporaneous prescribing feedback are limited by shift working. A pilot study investigating a ward-specific system of prospective ongoing prescribing error feedback to prescribers led to a significant reduction in errors. This study investigated the introduction of the system over several wards to reduce errors. Methods: A ward cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted in a UK teaching hospital, including all medical prescribers in four randomised inpatient ward areas. After an assessment of prescribing on each ward, a ward-specific feedback document was prepared, giving general and anonymous feedback, and forwarded to all consented participants in the intervention areas. The primary outcome was total prescribing order error rates; secondary outcome measures included clinical order error rates, technical order error rates and cost per error prevented. Results: A total of 1493 medication orders were assessed for errors. There was no difference in error rates at baseline (32.4 vs 42.6%, p = 0.594). After the introduction of the prospective ongoing prescribing error feedback, there was significant difference in the overall rates of error (64.8 vs 26.3%, p = 0.003). Similarly, there were statistically significant differences in the rates of clinical error (p = 0.003) and technical error (p = 0.013) on completion. The modelled cost of errors prevented in the intervention wards was £2.56 per error. Conclusions: A simple process of prescribing error feedback, grounded in non-technical skills educational theory, reduces prescribing errors within a hospital setting. This system is cost effective as well as requiring minimal resource to instigate. © 2017, Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 394
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A randomised controlled trial of feedback to general practitioners of their prophylactic aspirin prescribing
    McCartney, P
    Macdowall, W
    Thorogood, M
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7099): : 35 - 36
  • [2] Randomised controlled trial of effect of feedback on general practitioners' prescribing in Australia
    O'Connell, DL
    Henry, D
    Tomlins, R
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 318 (7182): : 507 - +
  • [3] Feedback and Training to Improve Use of an Electronic Prescribing System: A Randomised Controlled Trial
    Leung, Scott
    Zheng, Wu Yi
    Sandhu, Anmol
    Day, Richard
    Li, Ling
    Baysari, Melissa
    INTEGRATING AND CONNECTING CARE, 2017, 239 : 63 - 69
  • [4] The use of feedback to enhance environmental outcomes: a randomised controlled trial of a food waste scheme
    Nomura, Hisako
    John, Peter C.
    Cotterill, Sarah
    LOCAL ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 16 (07) : 637 - 653
  • [5] Protocol for the Effective Feedback to Improve Primary Care Prescribing Safety (EFIPPS) study: a cluster randomised controlled trial using ePrescribing data
    Guthrie, Bruce
    Treweek, Shaun
    Petrie, Dennis
    Barnett, Karen
    Ritchie, Lewis D.
    Robertson, Chris
    Bennie, Marion
    BMJ OPEN, 2012, 2 (06):
  • [6] Data feedback and behavioural change intervention to improve primary care prescribing safety (EFIPPS): multicentre, three arm, cluster randomised controlled trial
    Guthrie, Bruce
    Kavanagh, Kimberley
    Robertson, Chris
    Barnett, Karen
    Treweek, Shaun
    Petrie, Dennis
    Ritchie, Lewis
    Bennie, Marion
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 354
  • [7] An Audit and Feedback Intervention for Reducing Antibiotic Prescribing in General Dental Practice: The RAPiD Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
    Elouafkaoui, Paula
    Young, Linda
    Newlands, Rumana
    Duncan, Eilidh M.
    Elders, Andrew
    Clarkson, Jan E.
    Ramsay, Craig R.
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2016, 13 (08)
  • [8] ONGOING CLINICAL TRIAL: A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTRE, PHASE 2B RANDOMISED, CONTROLLED DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL TO DETERMINE THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF PERISPINAL ETANERCEPT ON QUALITY OF LIFE
    Thijs, V.
    Bernhardt, J.
    Cloud, G.
    Churilov, L.
    Sprigg, N.
    Parsons, B.
    Gilchrist, N.
    Walker, M.
    Bath, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2021, 16 (2_SUPPL) : 27 - 27
  • [9] The effect of ongoing feedback on physical activity levels following an exercise intervention in older adults: a randomised controlled trial protocol
    Katie-Jane Brickwood
    Stuart T. Smith
    Greig Watson
    Andrew D. Williams
    BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 9
  • [10] The effect of ongoing feedback on physical activity levels following an exercise intervention in older adults: a randomised controlled trial protocol
    Brickwood, Katie-Jane
    Smith, Stuart T.
    Watson, Greig
    Williams, Andrew D.
    BMC SPORTS SCIENCE MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2017, 9