Assessment of vitreous haze using ultra-wide field retinal imaging

被引:13
|
作者
Dickson D. [1 ]
Agarwal A. [1 ,3 ]
Sadiq M.A. [1 ]
Hassan M. [1 ]
High R. [2 ]
Nguyen Q.D. [1 ]
Sepah Y.J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ocular Imaging Research and Reading Center (OIRRC), Omaha, 68198-5540, NE
[2] College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 984355 Medical Center, Omaha, NE
[3] Advanced Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh
关键词
Fundus imaging; Scanning laser ophthalmoscopy; Ultra-wide field; Uveitis; Vitreous haze;
D O I
10.1186/s12348-016-0105-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Conventional fundus imaging has been used to assess vitreous haze (VH) in patients with uveitis. Ultra-wide field (UWF) retinal imaging that uses scanning laser technology has not been evaluated for the detection of VH. This pilot study evaluates the ability of UWF imaging in detecting VH. Patients with intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis were examined to assess the level of VH using slit-lamp biomicroscopy. Colored fundus images were acquired using a Carl Zeiss FF450 camera. The same photographer obtained fundus images of the same eyes during the same visit by Optos UWF P200Tx retinal camera. Two graders independently analyzed UWF fundus images for presence or absence of VH, without quantifying the degree of VH using any scale. The images were analyzed using the composite red plus red-free wavelengths utilized by the Optos UWF camera and by using each wavelength exclusively. These findings were compared to clinical detection of VH and detection of VH using conventional fundus photography. Results: Ninety-two eyes were included in the study. For composite UWF images, sensitivity was 0.27, specificity was 0.88, PPV was 0.31, NPV was 0.86, positive LR was 2.25, and negative LR was 0.83. For the conventional Zeiss images, sensitivity was 0.5, specificity was 0.84, PPV was 0.33, NPV was 0.91, positive LR was 3.13, and negative LR was 0.6. Agreement between the composite UWF and Zeiss techniques was substantial with k = 0.64. Inter-observer agreement for composite UWF images was also substantial with k = 0.65. Inter-observer agreement for Zeiss images was moderate with k = 0.471. Intra-observer agreement for both imaging modalities was substantial with a composite UWF k = 0.76 and Zeiss k = 0.7. Conclusions: UWF fundus imaging using scanning laser technique may be used to assess VH and employed in the management of intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis. © 2016, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of Vitreous Haze using Ultra-Wide Field Retinal Imaging
    Dickson, Drew
    Agarwal, Aniruddha
    Sadiq, Mohammad Ali
    High, Robin
    Quan Dong Nguyen
    Sepah, Yasir Jamal
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2015, 56 (07)
  • [2] Ultra-wide field imaging of nucleus drop in vitreous
    Mishra, Chitaranjan
    Babu, Naresh
    Kohli, Piyush
    Ramasamy, Kim
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 67 (08) : 1343 - 1343
  • [3] Ultra-wide field imaging of retinal haemangioma in retinitis pigmentosa
    Kumar, Vinod
    Samdani, Asha
    Chandra, Parijat
    Kumar, Atul
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2017, 100 (01) : 96 - 97
  • [4] Ultra-wide field retinal imaging: A wider clinical perspective
    Kumar, Vinod
    Surve, Abhidnya
    Kumawat, Devesh
    Takkar, Brijesh
    Azad, Shorya
    Chawla, Rohan
    Shroff, Daraius
    Arora, Atul
    Singh, Ramandeep
    Venkatesh, Pradeep
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 69 (04) : 824 - 835
  • [5] Clinic-based ultra-wide field retinal imaging in a pediatric population
    Nikisha Kothari
    Stacy Pineles
    David Sarraf
    Federico Velez
    Gad Heilweil
    Gary Holland
    Colin A. McCannel
    Tania Onclinx
    Tara A. McCannel
    SriniVas R. Sadda
    Steven D. Schwartz
    Irena Tsui
    [J]. International Journal of Retina and Vitreous, 5
  • [6] Clinic-based ultra-wide field retinal imaging in a pediatric population
    Kothari, Nikisha
    Pineles, Stacy
    Sarraf, David
    Velez, Federico
    Heilweil, Gad
    Holland, Gary
    McCannel, Colin A.
    Onclinx, Tania
    McCannel, Tara A.
    Sadda, SriniVas R.
    Schwartz, Steven D.
    Tsui, Irena
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RETINA AND VITREOUS, 2019, 5 (Suppl 1)
  • [7] Ultra-wide Field Retinal Imaging in Detection, Classification, and Management of Diabetic Retinopathy
    Soliman, Ahmed Z.
    Silva, Paolo S.
    Aiello, Lloyd Paul
    Sun, Jennifer K.
    [J]. SEMINARS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 27 (5-6) : 221 - 227
  • [8] Ultra-Wide Field Imaging Characteristics of Primary Retinal Vasculitis: Risk Factors for Retinal Neovascularization
    Sheemar, Abhishek
    Temkar, Shreyas
    Takkar, Brijesh
    Sood, Rita
    Sinha, Sanjeev
    Chawla, Rohan
    Vohra, Rajpal
    Venkatesh, Pradeep
    [J]. OCULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND INFLAMMATION, 2019, 27 (03) : 383 - 388
  • [9] Design and Simulation of an Ultra-Wide Field Optical Coherence Tomography Retinal Imaging System
    Liang, Shanshan
    Li, Xinyu
    Kang, Jiajing
    Wan, Mingming
    Wang, Jiahui
    Zhang, Jun
    [J]. PHOTONICS, 2021, 8 (11)
  • [10] Deep Learning for prediction of late recurrence of retinal detachment using preoperative and postoperative ultra-wide field imaging
    Catania, Fiammetta
    Chapron, Thibaut
    Crincoli, Emanuele
    Miere, Alexandra
    Abdelmassih, Youssef
    Beaumont, William
    Chehaibou, Ismael
    Metge, Florence
    Bruneau, Sebastien
    Bonnin, Sophie
    Souied, Eric H.
    Caputo, Georges
    [J]. ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2024,