Large-Eddy Simulation of Katabatic Flows

被引:0
|
作者
Eric D. Skyllingstad
机构
[1] Oregon State University,College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences
来源
Boundary-Layer Meteorology | 2003年 / 106卷
关键词
Katabatic flows; Large-eddy simulation; Turbulence;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A large-eddy simulation model with rotated coordinates and an open boundary is used to simulate the characteristics of katabatic flows over simple terrain. Experiments examine the effects of cross winds on the development of the slope-flow boundary layer for a steep (20°) slope and the role of drainage winds in preventing turbulence collapse on a gentle slope (1°). For the steep flow cases, comparisons between model average boundary-layer velocity, temperature deficit, and turbulence kinetic energy budget terms and tower observations show reasonable agreement. Results for different cross slope winds show that as the cross slope winds increase, the slope flow deepens faster and behaves more like a weakly stratified, sheared boundary layer. Analysis of the momentum budget shows that near the surface the flow is maintained by a balance between downslope buoyancy forcing and vertical turbulence flux from surface drag. Above the downslope jet, the turbulence vertical momentum flux reverses sign and acceleration of the flow by buoyancy is controlled by horizontal advection of slower moving ambient air. The turbulence budget is dominated by a balance between shear production and eddy dissipation, however, buoyancy and pressure transport both are significant in reducing the strength of turbulence above the jet. Results from the gentle slope case show that even a slight terrain variation can lead to significant drainage winds. Comparison of the gentle slope case with a flat terrain simulation indicates that drainage winds can effectively prevent the formation of very stable boundary layers, at least near the top of sloping terrain.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 243
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Large-eddy simulation of katabatic flows
    Skyllingstad, ED
    [J]. BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2003, 106 (02) : 217 - 243
  • [2] An intercomparison of subgrid models for large-eddy simulation of katabatic flows
    Smith, Craig M.
    Porte-Agel, Fernando
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 140 (681) : 1294 - 1303
  • [3] Large-eddy simulation of downslope flows
    Skyllingstad, ED
    [J]. 10TH CONFERENCE ON MOUNTAIN METEOROLOGY, 2002, : 97 - 100
  • [4] Large-Eddy Simulation of transcritical flows
    Schmitt, T.
    Selle, L.
    Cuenot, B.
    Poinsot, T.
    [J]. COMPTES RENDUS MECANIQUE, 2009, 337 (6-7): : 528 - 538
  • [5] Large-eddy simulation of in-cylinder flows
    Haworth, D.C.
    [J]. Revue de l'Institute Francais du Petrole, 1999, 54 (02): : 175 - 185
  • [6] Large-eddy simulation of turbulent reacting flows
    Pitsch, Heinz
    Desjardins, Olivier
    Balarac, Guillaume
    Ihme, Matthias
    [J]. PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2008, 44 (06) : 466 - 478
  • [7] LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION OF TURBULENT ANISOCHORIC FLOWS
    FUREBY, C
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 1995, 33 (07) : 1263 - 1272
  • [8] Large-eddy simulation of in-cylinder flows
    Haworth, DC
    [J]. OIL & GAS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-REVUE D IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES, 1999, 54 (02): : 175 - 185
  • [9] Large-eddy simulation of katabatic winds. Part 1: Comparison with observations
    Axelsen, Simon L.
    van Dop, Han
    [J]. ACTA GEOPHYSICA, 2009, 57 (04) : 803 - 836
  • [10] Large-eddy simulation of katabatic winds. Part 1: Comparison with observations
    Simon L. Axelsen
    Han van Dop
    [J]. Acta Geophysica, 2009, 57 : 803 - 836