Geotechnical aspects of the 2010 Darfield and 2011 Christchurch earthquakes, New Zealand, and geotechnical damage to structures and lifelines

被引:0
|
作者
Ömer Aydan
Reşat Ulusay
Masanori Hamada
Dick Beetham
机构
[1] Tokai University,Ocean Research Institute
[2] Hacettepe University,Department of Geological Engineering
[3] Waseda University,Civil Engineering Department
[4] GNS Science,undefined
关键词
Liquefaction; Lateral spreading; Darfield earthquake; Port Hill; Christchurch earthquake; Geotechnical damage; Slope instability; Liquéfaction; Glissement par étalement latéral; Séisme de Darfield; Port Hills; Séisme de Christchurch; Dommage géotechnique; Instabilité de pente;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Darfield earthquake (Mw 7.1; ML 7.2) occurred along a previously unknown strike-slip fault in Canterbury Province, New Zealand on 4 September 2010. The second (Christchurch) earthquake (Mw = 6.2) on 22 February 2011, caused by a thrust fault, affected the same region. Both earthquakes caused extensive liquefaction, associated ground deformation and severe damage to residential houses and utilities while instability occurred on the Port Hills. In this study, observations by the authors at different parts of the earthquake-affected region after both earthquakes are described, analyzed and discussed. The grain-size distribution of the liquefied soils shows a good agreement with empirical bounds of liquefiable soils. In addition, comparisons of the observations with the empirical relations linking the earthquake magnitude and liquefaction limit distance, show good agreement. The factors of safety against liquefaction are very low when computed by three different techniques using the data from available geotechnical boreholes. Good correlations are obtained between the displacements due to lateral spreading and those estimated from the aerial photogrammetry method, and between the observations with empirical magnitude and epicentral limit distance relations for coherent and disrupted slopes. Estimations using an empirical relation proposed by the authors are compared with lateral spreading and it is concluded that the thickness of liquefiable layers ranges between 4 and 8 m. As the houses and suburban buildings were light, the effect of liquefaction and lateral spreading caused severe damage but not collapse. However, heavy concrete structures settled and tilted and empty buried tanks floated. It is of note that these two earthquakes and major aftershocks greater than magnitude 5 showed that the same areas could liquefy multiple times if the conditions for liquefaction are satisfied.
引用
收藏
页码:637 / 662
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Geotechnical aspects of the 2010 Darfield and 2011 Christchurch earthquakes, New Zealand, and geotechnical damage to structures and lifelines
    Aydan, Oemer
    Ulusay, Resat
    Hamada, Masanori
    Beetham, Dick
    BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 71 (04) : 637 - 662
  • [2] Spatial variation of magnitude scaling factors during the 2010 Darfield and 2011 Christchurch, New Zealand, earthquakes
    Carter, W. L.
    Green, R. A.
    Bradley, B. A.
    Wotherspoon, L. M.
    Cubrinovski, M.
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2016, 91 : 175 - 186
  • [3] Performance of Bridges during the 2010 Darfield and 2011 Christchurch Earthquakes
    Wotherspoon, Liam
    Bradshaw, Aaron
    Green, Russell
    Wood, Clinton
    Palermo, Alessandro
    Cubrinovski, Misko
    Bradley, Brendon
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2011, 82 (06) : 950 - 964
  • [4] Lateral spreading displacements from the 2010 Darfield and 2011 Christchurch earthquakes
    Robinson, Kelly
    Cubrinovski, Misko
    Bradley, Brendon A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 8 (04) : 441 - 448
  • [5] GEOTECHNICAL ASPECTS OF THE 22 FEBRUARY 2011 CHRISTCHURCH EARTHQUAKE
    Cubrinovski, Misko
    Bradley, Brendon
    Wotherspoon, Liam
    Green, Russell
    Bray, Jonathan
    Wood, Clint
    Pender, Michael
    Allen, John
    Bradshaw, Aaron
    Rix, Glenn
    Taylor, Merrick
    Robinson, Kelly
    Henderson, Duncan
    Giorgini, Simona
    Ma, Kun
    Winkley, Anna
    Zupan, Josh
    O'Rourke, Thomas
    DePascale, Greg
    Wells, Donnald
    BULLETIN OF THE NEW ZEALAND SOCIETY FOR EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2011, 44 (04): : 205 - 226
  • [6] Efficacy of Aging Correction for Liquefaction Assessment of Case Histories Recorded during the 2010 Darfield and 2011 Christchurch Earthquakes in New Zealand
    Rahimi, Salman
    Wood, Clinton M.
    Wotherspoon, Liam M.
    Green, Russell A.
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 146 (08)
  • [7] Pipeline damage caused by transient ground deformation: Case study of 2010 Darfield and 2011 Christchurch earthquakes
    Milashuk, Serozhah
    Crane, William
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2012, 41 : 84 - 88
  • [8] Rethinking Resilience: Reflections on the Earthquakes in Christchurch, New Zealand, 2010 and 2011
    Hayward, Bronwyn Mary
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (04):
  • [9] Performance of Levees (Stopbanks) during the 4 September 2010 Mw 7.1 Darfield and 22 February 2011 Mw 62 Christchurch, New Zealand, Earthquakes
    Green, Russell A.
    Allen, John
    Wotherspoon, Liam
    Cubrinovski, Misko
    Bradley, Brendon
    Bradshaw, Aaron
    Cox, Brady
    Algie, Thomas
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2011, 82 (06) : 939 - 949
  • [10] Origin of Earthquake Light Associated with Earthquakes in Christchurch, New Zealand, 2010-2011
    Whitehead, N. E.
    Ulusoy, U.
    EARTH SCIENCES RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2015, 19 (02) : 113 - 120