Effective approaches to public involvement in care home research: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

被引:2
|
作者
Burgher T. [1 ]
Shepherd V. [2 ]
Nollett C. [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff
[2] Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, 4Th Floor, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff
关键词
Care home residents; Disabled adults; Long-term care facilities; Nursing homes; Older adults; Person-centred opportunities; Public involvement; Stakeholder involvement; Systematic review;
D O I
10.1186/s40900-023-00453-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Public involvement (often referred to as patient and public involvement or PPI) integrates the voices of the public in health and care research. However, groups such as care home residents are often excluded from involvement opportunities due to the complexities of involving people with additional care and communication needs. Despite a range of approaches being used, there is little understanding about how best to incorporate their experiences, and those of other care home stakeholders, into the design and conduct of research. Objective: A systematic review was conducted to identify PPI methods that better meet the specific needs of care home stakeholders. This was undertaken by (1) outlining effective PPI approaches used in care home research and the key stakeholders involved; (2) describing the role of PPI in different care home contexts and (3) identifying stakeholders’ experiences and attitudes towards PPI in care homes. Methods: Databases CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Scopus were searched for English language papers from inception to November 2021. A narrative synthesis approach was utilised to organise the extracted data into five themes. Results: The search initially yielded 2314 articles (following de-duplication), with 27 meeting the inclusion criteria. Articles reported a range of input from stakeholders (including residents, staff, relatives and community stakeholders), with the impact of PPI varying according to the type of care establishment and research context. The experiences and reflections of stakeholders’ about their involvement in care home research varied, with some studies offering first-hand accounts compared with summaries from researchers. Some articles explicitly evaluated the effectiveness of the PPI approach using specific outcome measures whilst others indirectly described the impact of their approach. Five themes were identified as characterising an effective PPI approach: (1) valuing stakeholders’ perspectives, (2) awareness of the multi-faceted research context, (3) ensuring inclusivity and transparency, (4) maintaining flexibility and adaptability and (5) utilising resources and wider support. Conclusion: Effective PPI in care home research requires researchers to create person-centred opportunities to adequately involve groups with physical and cognitive impairments. The findings led to the creation of evidence-based practical recommendations to support future involvement opportunities and help researchers develop strategies for inclusive opportunities for involvement. Systematic Review Registration: The review was prospectively registered on PROPSERO (CRD42021293353). © 2023, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Values associated with public involvement in health and social care research: a narrative review
    Gradinger, Felix
    Britten, Nicky
    Wyatt, Katrina
    Froggatt, Katherine
    Gibson, Andy
    Jacoby, Ann
    Lobban, Fiona
    Mayes, Debbie
    Snape, Dee
    Rawcliffe, Tim
    Popay, Jennie
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2015, 18 (05) : 661 - 675
  • [2] Public involvement in the systematic review process in health and social care: A narrative review of case examples
    Boote, Jonathan
    Baird, Wendy
    Sutton, Anthea
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 2011, 102 (2-3) : 105 - 116
  • [3] Contemporary public perceptions of nursing: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the international research evidence
    Girvin, June
    Jackson, Debra
    Hutchinson, Marie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2016, 24 (08) : 994 - 1006
  • [4] Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review
    Brett, Jo
    Staniszewska, Sophie
    Mockford, Carole
    Herron-Marx, Sandra
    Hughes, John
    Tysall, Colin
    Suleman, Rashida
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2014, 17 (05) : 637 - 650
  • [5] Participatory research with carers: A systematic review and narrative synthesis
    Bowness, Bryher
    Henderson, Claire
    Khan, Samia C. Akhter
    Akiba, Mia
    Lawrence, Vanessa
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2024, 27 (01)
  • [6] Social workers’ involvement in advance care planning: a systematic narrative review
    Chong-Wen Wang
    Cecilia L. W. Chan
    Amy Y. M. Chow
    [J]. BMC Palliative Care, 17
  • [7] Social workers' involvement in advance care planning: a systematic narrative review
    Wang, Chong-Wen
    Chan, Cecilia L. W.
    Chow, Amy Y. M.
    [J]. BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2017, 17
  • [8] Attitudes and approaches to patient and public involvement across Europe: A systematic review
    Biddle, Michele S. Y.
    Gibson, Andy
    Evans, David
    [J]. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2021, 29 (01) : 18 - 27
  • [9] Home-Based End of Life Care for Children and their Families - A Systematic Scoping Review and Narrative Synthesis
    Malcolm, Cari
    Knighting, Katherine
    Taylor, Charlotte
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NURSING-NURSING CARE OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, 2020, 55 : 126 - 133
  • [10] Bereavement care in primary care: a systematic literature review and narrative synthesis
    Nagraj, Shobhana
    Barclay, Stephen
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2011, 61 (582): : e42 - e48