How does upgrading an emissions inventory affect air quality simulations?

被引:0
|
作者
M. A. Russo
C. Gama
A. Monteiro
机构
[1] University of Aveiro,CESAM & Department of Environment and Planning
来源
关键词
Atmospheric emissions; EMEP inventory; Inventory resolution; Air quality modelling; Portugal;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Each year, all Member States (MS) have to deliver their national emissions inventory to the European Union for all activity sectors, following the requirements of the CLRTAP programme. Recently, the specifications of this emissions report changed, MS emissions data had to be reported in grid cells with a resolution of 0.5° × 0.5°, and now, from 2015 forward, they must use a higher resolution grid (0.1° × 0.1°). The purpose of this study is to investigate the main differences found between these two emissions inventories for Europe, focusing on Portugal as a case study, using their available common year (2015). Differences on emissions values and their spatial distribution were analysed per sector and pollutant. Additionally, to evaluate and compare the accuracy of both datasets, air quality modelling simulations were performed, and the resulting pollutant concentrations were validated using data from observations. The results found indicated major differences in several MS (e.g. France, Italy, Germany and Spain). Portugal was not one of the delta hotspots but significant differences were still found, mainly for NOx emissions for the transport sectors, both emissions and concentrations in urban areas, as well as NO2 concentrations throughout the study domain. The analysis of the air quality modelling outputs indicates that the EMEP0.1 inventory does not improve model performance, which suggests that the methodology to build EMEP0.1 was not adequate. This work highlights the importance of accurately estimating emissions data and confirms what other studies already indicated regarding uncertainties: solely improving the emissions inventory resolution does not necessarily imply higher accuracy in the results.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 741
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How does upgrading an emissions inventory affect air quality simulations?
    Russo, M. A.
    Gama, C.
    Monteiro, A.
    [J]. AIR QUALITY ATMOSPHERE AND HEALTH, 2019, 12 (06): : 731 - 741
  • [2] How does the use of biodiesel affect urban air quality?
    Ribeiro, I.
    Monteiro, A.
    Martins, H.
    Freitas, S.
    Borrego, C.
    Lopes, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND POLLUTION, 2015, 58 (1-2) : 79 - 88
  • [3] How does agricultural industrial structure upgrading affect agricultural carbon emissions? Threshold effects analysis for China
    Hongxu Shi
    Ming Chang
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 52943 - 52957
  • [4] How does agricultural industrial structure upgrading affect agricultural carbon emissions? Threshold effects analysis for China
    Shi, Hongxu
    Chang, Ming
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (18) : 52943 - 52957
  • [5] An air quality survey and emissions inventory at Aberdeen Harbour
    Marr, I. L.
    Rosser, D. P.
    Meneses, C. A.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 41 (30) : 6379 - 6395
  • [6] How Does Straw Burning Affect Urban Air Quality in China?JEL codes
    Guo, Shiqi
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 103 (03) : 1122 - 1140
  • [7] Does institutional quality affect air pollution?
    Zhongfei Chen
    Xinyue Hao
    Mengling Zhou
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 28317 - 28338
  • [8] Does institutional quality affect air pollution?
    Chen, Zhongfei
    Hao, Xinyue
    Zhou, Mengling
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (19) : 28317 - 28338
  • [9] Does vaping affect indoor air quality?
    Destaillats, Hugo
    Singer, Brett
    Salthammer, Tunga
    [J]. INDOOR AIR, 2020, 30 (05) : 793 - 794
  • [10] Air quality in the City of La Paz, Mexico: emissions inventory and air pollutants
    Ivanova, A.
    Bermudez, A.
    Martinez, A.
    Montano, A.
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING VIII, 2017, 210 : 631 - 640