FAOSTAT estimates of greenhouse gas emissions from biomass and peat fires

被引:0
|
作者
Simone Rossi
Francesco N. Tubiello
Paolo Prosperi
Mirella Salvatore
Heather Jacobs
Riccardo Biancalani
Joanna I. House
Luigi Boschetti
机构
[1] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations,Institute for Environment and Sustainability
[2] The European Commission Joint Research Centre,School of Geographical Sciences
[3] University of Bristol,Department of Forest, Rangeland and Fire Sciences, College of Natural Resources
[4] University of Idaho,undefined
来源
Climatic Change | 2016年 / 135卷
关键词
Burned Area; Land Cover Class; Fire Emission; Peat Fire; Normalize Mean Absolute Error;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED3) and the FAOSTAT Emissions database, containing estimates of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from biomass burning and peat fires, are compared. The two datasets formed the basis for several analyses in the fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC AR5), and thus represent a critical source of information for emissions inventories at national, regional and global level. The two databases differ in their level of computational complexity in estimating emissions. While both use the same burned area information from remote sensing, estimates of available biomass are computed in GFED3 at tier 3 using a complex dynamic vegetation model, while they are computed in FAOSTAT using default, tier 1 parameters from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Over the analysis period 1997–2011, the two methods were found to produce very similar global GHG emissions estimates for each of the five GFED aggregated biomass fire classes: i) Savanna; ii) Woodland; iii) Forest; iv) Deforestation; v) Peatlands; with total emissions ranging 6–8 Gt CO2eq yr-1. The main differences between the two datasets were found with respect to peat fires, with FAOSTAT showing a lower 1997–1998 peak in emissions compared with GFED3, within an otherwise good agreement for the rest of the study period, when limited to the three tropical countries covered by GFED. Conversely, FAOSTAT global emissions from peat fires, including both boreal and tropical regions, were several times larger than those currently estimated by GFED3. Results show that FAOSTAT activity data and emission estimates for biomass fires offer a robust alternative to the more sophisticated GFED data, representing a valuable resource for national GHG inventory experts, especially in countries where technical and institutional constraints may limit access, generation and maintenance of more complex methodologies and data.
引用
收藏
页码:699 / 711
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] FAOSTAT estimates of greenhouse gas emissions from biomass and peat fires
    Rossi, Simone
    Tubiello, Francesco N.
    Prosperi, Paolo
    Salvatore, Mirella
    Jacobs, Heather
    Biancalani, Riccardo
    House, Joanna I.
    Boschetti, Luigi
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2016, 135 (3-4) : 699 - 711
  • [2] New estimates of greenhouse gas emissions from biomass burning and peat fires using MODIS Collection 6 burned areas
    Prosperi, Paolo
    Bloise, Mario
    Tubiello, Francesco N.
    Conchedda, Giulia
    Rossi, Simone
    Boschetti, Luigi
    Salvatore, Mirella
    Bernoux, Martial
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2020, 161 (03) : 415 - 432
  • [3] New estimates of greenhouse gas emissions from biomass burning and peat fires using MODIS Collection 6 burned areas
    Paolo Prosperi
    Mario Bloise
    Francesco N. Tubiello
    Giulia Conchedda
    Simone Rossi
    Luigi Boschetti
    Mirella Salvatore
    Martial Bernoux
    [J]. Climatic Change, 2020, 161 : 415 - 432
  • [4] The FAOSTAT database of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture
    Tubiello, Francesco N.
    Salvatore, Mirella
    Rossi, Simone
    Ferrara, Alessandro
    Fitton, Nuala
    Smith, Pete
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 8 (01):
  • [5] Identifying and addressing knowledge gaps for improving greenhouse gas emissions estimates from tropical peat forest fires
    Volkova, Liubov
    Krisnawati, Haruni
    Adinugroho, Wahyu C.
    Imanuddin, Rinaldi
    Qirom, Muhammad A.
    Santosa, Purwanto B.
    Halwany, Wawan
    Weston, Christopher J.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 763 (763)
  • [6] Greenhouse gas emissions from vegetation fires in southern Africa
    Scholes, RJ
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 1995, 38 (2-3) : 169 - 179
  • [7] Incorporating uncertainty analysis into life cycle estimates of greenhouse gas emissions from biomass production
    Johnson, David R.
    Willis, Henry H.
    Curtright, Aimee E.
    Samaras, Constantine
    Skone, Timothy
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2011, 35 (07): : 2619 - 2626
  • [8] Greenhouse gas emissions related to fires in photovoltaic installations
    Stølen, Reidar
    [J]. International Journal of Ambient Energy, 2024, 45 (01):
  • [9] Peat Fire Detection to Estimate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    A. A. Sirin
    M. A. Medvedeva
    V. Yu. Itkin
    D. A. Makarov
    V. N. Korotkov
    [J]. Russian Meteorology and Hydrology, 2022, 47 : 748 - 757
  • [10] Peat Fire Detection to Estimate Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    Sirin, A. A.
    Medvedeva, M. A.
    Itkin, V. Yu.
    Makarov, D. A.
    Korotkov, V. N.
    [J]. RUSSIAN METEOROLOGY AND HYDROLOGY, 2022, 47 (10) : 748 - 757