Advancing the scholarship and practice of stakeholder engagement in working landscapes: a co-produced research agenda

被引：4

作者：

Eaton W.M. ^{[1
]}

Burnham M. ^{[2
]}

Robertson T. ^{[3
]}

Arbuckle J.G. ^{[4
]}

Brasier K.J. ^{[5
]}

Burbach M.E. ^{[6
]}

Church S.P. ^{[7
]}

Hart-Fredeluces G. ^{[2
]}

Jackson-Smith D. ^{[8
]}

Wildermuth G. ^{[5
]}

Canfield K.N. ^{[9
]}

Córdova S.C. ^{[6
]}

Chatelain C.D. ^{[10
]}

Fowler L.B. ^{[5
]}

Hendawy M.M.Z.A. ^{[11
]}

Kirchhoff C.J. ^{[5
]}

Manheim M.K. ^{[12
]}

Martinez R.O. ^{[13
]}

Mook A. ^{[14
]}

Mullin C.A. ^{[9
]}

Murrah-Hanson A.L. ^{[15
]}

Onabola C.O. ^{[16
]}

Parker L.E. ^{[17
]}

Redd E.A. ^{[2
]}

Schelly C. ^{[18
]}

Schoon M.L. ^{[19
]}

Sigler W.A. ^{[7
]}

Smit E. ^{[20
]}

van Huysen T. ^{[21
]}

Worosz M.R. ^{[22
]}

Eberly C. ^{[3
]}

Rogers A. ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] University of Wyoming, Laramie

[2] Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID

[3] Southwest Decision Resources, Tucson

[4] Iowa State University, Ames

[5] Penn State University, State College

[6] University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln

[7] Montana State University, Bozeman, MT

[8] Ohio State University, Columbus

[9] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, WA

[10] Barnstable Clean Water Coalition, Osterville

[11] Ain Shams University, Cairo

[12] School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, AZ

[13] Michigan State University, East Lansing

[14] Colorado State University, Fort Collins

[15] Independent Researcher, Salt Lake City

[16] University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George

[17] USDA California Climate Hub, WA

[18] Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI

[19] Arizona State University, Arizona

[20] University of Toronto, Toronto

[21] USDA Agricultural Research Service, MD

[22] Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University, Auburn

来源：

Socio-Ecological Practice Research | 2022年 / 4卷 / 4期

基金：

美国食品与农业研究所;

关键词：

Community and stakeholder engagement; Engagement outcomes; Knowledge co-production; Process design; Research-practice gaps; Working lands;

D O I：

10.1007/s42532-022-00132-8

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Participatory approaches to science and decision making, including stakeholder engagement, are increasingly common for managing complex socio-ecological challenges in working landscapes. However, critical questions about stakeholder engagement in this space remain. These include normative, political, and ethical questions concerning who participates, who benefits and loses, what good can be accomplished, and for what, whom, and by who. First, opportunities for addressing justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion interests through engagement, while implied in key conceptual frameworks, remain underexplored in scholarly work and collaborative practice alike. A second line of inquiry relates to research–practice gaps. While both the practice of doing engagement work and scholarly research on the efficacy of engagement is on the rise, there is little concerted interplay among ‘on-the-ground’ practitioners and scholarly researchers. This means scientific research often misses or ignores insight grounded in practical and experiential knowledge, while practitioners are disconnected from potentially useful scientific research on stakeholder engagement. A third set of questions concerns gaps in empirical understanding of the efficacy of engagement processes and includes inquiry into how different engagement contexts and process features affect a range of behavioral, cognitive, and decision-making outcomes. Because of these gaps, a cohesive and actionable research agenda for stakeholder engagement research and practice in working landscapes remains elusive. In this review article, we present a co-produced research agenda for stakeholder engagement in working landscapes. The co-production process involved professionally facilitated and iterative dialogue among a diverse and international group of over 160 scholars and practitioners through a yearlong virtual workshop series. The resulting research agenda is organized under six cross-cutting themes: (1) Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion; (2) Ethics; (3) Research and Practice; (4) Context; (5) Process; and (6) Outcomes and Measurement. This research agenda identifies critical research needs and opportunities relevant for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers alike. We argue that addressing these research opportunities is necessary to advance knowledge and practice of stakeholder engagement and to support more just and effective engagement processes in working landscapes. © 2022, The Author(s).

引用

页码：283 / 304

页数：21

共 50 条

[1] Advancing the scholarship and practice of stakeholder engagement in working landscapes: identifying and responding to six key research gaps
Georgia M. Hart-Fredeluces
Morey Burnham
Weston M. Eaton
Kathryn J. Brasier
Sarah P. Church
Grace Wildermuth
[J]. Socio-Ecological Practice Research, 2023, 5 (3) : 231 - 237
[2] Social, cultural and community engagement and mental health: cross-disciplinary, co-produced research agenda
Fancourt, Daisy
Bhui, Kamaldeep
Chatterjee, Helen
Crawford, Paul
Crossick, Geoffrey
DeNora, Tia
South, Jane
[J]. BJPSYCH OPEN, 2020, 7 (01):
[3] Conceptualising quality in co-produced research
Howard, Marilyn
Thomas-Hughes, Helen
[J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (05) : 788 - 805
[4] Identity and power in co-produced activist research
Kara, Helen
[J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, 2017, 17 (03) : 289 - 301
[5] The psychology of Gaelic games: a co-produced scoping review to inform research, policy, and practice
Jackman, Patricia C.
Lane, Aoife
Wells, Nicole
Kirby, Kate
Bird, Matthew D.
[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORT AND EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2023,
[6] Opening the black box of conservation philanthropy: A co-produced research agenda on private foundations in marine conservation
Gruby, Rebecca L.
Enrici, Ashley
Betsill, Michele
Le Cornu, Elodie
Basurto, Xavier
[J]. MARINE POLICY, 2021, 132
[7] Advancing knowledge about stakeholder engagement in multisectoral nutrition research
Warren, Andrea M.
Constantinides, Shilpa, V
Blake, Christine E.
Frongillo, Edward A.
[J]. GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 29
[8] Stakeholder Engagement in Higher Education: State of the Art and Research Agenda
Crocco, Edoardo
Giacosa, Elisa
Culasso, Francesca
[J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2024, 71 : 13457 - 13468
[9] Managing sensitive relations in co-produced planning research
O'Hare, Paul
Coaffee, Jon
Hawkesworth, Marian
[J]. PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2010, 30 (04) : 243 - 250
[10] The world cafe is an unmethod within co-produced research
Monforte, Javier
Netherway, Jake
Smith, Brett
[J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 20 (03) : 398 - 419

← 1 2 3 4 5 →