Effectiveness of Combining Antiobesity Medication With an Employer-Based Weight Management Program for Treatment of Obesity A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE The clinical efficacy of antiobesity medications (AOMs) as adjuncts to lifestyle intervention is well characterized, but data regarding their use in conjunction with workplace wellness plans are lacking, and coverage of AOMs by US private employers is limited. OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of combining AOMs with a comprehensive, interdisciplinary, employer-based weight management program (WMP) compared with the WMP alone on weight loss, treatment adherence, and work productivity and limitations. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This 1-year, single-center, open-label, parallel-group, realworld, randomized clinical trial was conducted at the Cleveland Clinic's Endocrinology and Metabolism Institute in Cleveland, Ohio, from January 7, 2019, to May 22, 2020. Participants were adults with obesity (body mass index [BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared] >= 30) enrolled in the Cleveland Clinic Employee Health Plan. INTERVENTIONS In total, 200 participants were randomized 1:1, 100 participants to WMP combined with an AOM(WMP+Rx), and 100 participants to WMP alone. The WMP was the Cleveland Clinic Endocrinology and Metabolism Institute's employer-based integrated medical WMP implemented through monthly multidisciplinary shared medical appointments. Participants in the WMP+Rx group initiated treatment with 1 of 5 US Food and Drug Administration-approved medications for chronic weight management (orlistat, lorcaserin, phentermine/topiramate, naltrexone/bupropion, and liraglutide, 3.0mg) according to standard clinical practice. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point was the percentage change in body weight from baseline to month 12. RESULTS The 200 participants were predominately (177 of 200 [88.5%]) women, had a mean (SD) age of 50.0 (10.3) years, and a mean (SD) baseline weight of 105.0 (19.0) kg. For the primary intention-to-treat estimand, the estimated mean (SE) weight loss was -7.7%(0.7%) for the WMP+Rx group vs -4.2%(0.7%) for the WMP group, with an estimated treatment difference of -3.5%(95% CI, -5.5% to -1.5%) (P < .001). The estimated percentage of participants achieving at least 5% weight loss was 62.5% for WMP+Rx vs 44.8% for WMP (P = .02). The rate of attendance at shared medical appointments was higher for the WMP+Rx group than for the WMP group. No meaningful differences in patient-reported work productivity or limitation measures were observed. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Clinically meaningful superior mean weight loss was achieved when access to AOMs was provided in the real-world setting of an employer-based WMP, compared with the WMP alone. Such results may inform employer decisions regarding AOM coverage and guide best practices for comprehensive, interdisciplinary employer-based WMPs.