Aerobic oxidation of styrene in functional reactors and computational fluid dynamics simulation

被引:2
|
作者
Zhang, Lingling [1 ]
Liu, Chengzhi [1 ]
He, Xiangpo [1 ]
Zhang, Feng [1 ]
Zhang, Zhibing [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Sch Chem & Chem Engn, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
benzaldehyde; computational fluid dynamics; oxidation; reactors; styrene oxide; MOLECULAR-OXYGEN; CFD SIMULATION; ACTIVE CATALYSTS; AIRLIFT REACTOR; EPOXIDATION; ALKENES; COMPLEX; OLEFINS; OXIDE; NANOPARTICLES;
D O I
10.1002/apj.2206
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
A possible reaction mechanism was proposed, and the kinetic relationships between rate of styrene conversion (or product generation) and condition parameters were established for the aerobic oxidation of styrene by using isobutyraldehyde as coreductant and cobalt(II) acetate as catalyst. The effects of aldehyde amount, catalyst amount, and volume ratio of solvent to styrene on the total yield of products (styrene oxide and benzaldehyde) were evaluated by the response surface methodology systematically. Relative mathematical models were presented to reveal the optimal reaction conditions, which were used for further scale-up experiments in bubbling column reactor and airlift loop reactor. The 2 reactors had different results due to structural characteristics. Larger gas holdup and longer gas residence time led to higher styrene conversion in the bubbling column reactor, whereas faster and regular liquid circulation resulted in higher styrene oxide selectivity in the airlift loop reactor due to better dispersion of solid catalyst. Furthermore, the different performances of the 2 reactors were explained with computational fluid dynamics by considering turbulence intensity, axial velocity distribution, gas holdup, and volumetric mass transfer coefficient.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On the simulation of stirred tank reactors via computational fluid dynamics
    Brucato, A
    Ciofalo, M
    Grisafi, F
    Tocco, R
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2000, 55 (02) : 291 - 302
  • [2] Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Thermal Runaway Reaction of Styrene Polymerization
    Cui, Jiawei
    Ni, Lei
    Jiang, Juncheng
    Pan, Yong
    Wu, Hao
    Chen, Qiang
    [J]. ORGANIC PROCESS RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 23 (03) : 389 - 396
  • [3] Aerobic Sludge Granulation: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of Fluid Flow Patterns in Bubble Column Reactors
    Fan, Wenwen
    Yuan, LinJiang
    Li, Yonglin
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2023, 40 (09) : 381 - 393
  • [4] Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Multiscale Mixing in Anionic Polymerization Tubular Reactors
    Xie, Le
    Zhu, Li-Tao
    Luo, Zheng-Hong
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 39 (05) : 857 - 864
  • [5] Computational Fluid Dynamics in the Development of Catalytic Reactors
    Klenov, O. P.
    Noskov, A. S.
    [J]. CATALYSIS IN INDUSTRY, 2011, 3 (04) : 331 - 349
  • [6] Performance analysis of ultraviolet water disinfection reactors using computational fluid dynamics simulation
    Xu, Chen
    Zhao, X. S.
    Rangaiah, G. P.
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2013, 221 : 398 - 406
  • [7] Multiphase Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Air and Fuel Reactors of Chemical Looping Combustion
    Kumar, Pulkit
    Parwani, Ajit Kumar
    Vitankar, Vivek
    [J]. HEAT TRANSFER ENGINEERING, 2022, 44 (07) : 675 - 687
  • [8] Prospective on applying machine learning in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation of metallurgical reactors
    Liu, Yuhong
    Zhang, Jiangshan
    Yang, Shufeng
    Li, Jingshe
    Liu, Qing
    [J]. IRONMAKING & STEELMAKING, 2024,
  • [9] Coupled system dynamics and computational fluid dynamics simulation of plant transients in sodium cooled fast reactors
    Natesan, K.
    Velusamy, K.
    [J]. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2019, 342 : 157 - 169
  • [10] Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of a Styrene Polymerization Reactor
    Patel, Haresh
    Dhib, Ramdhane
    Ein-Mozaffari, Farhad
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 33 (02) : 258 - 266