Tank mixture of glyphosate with 2,4-D accentuates 2,4-D injury in glyphosate-resistant corn

被引:7
|
作者
Soltani, Nader [1 ]
Shropshire, Christy [1 ]
Sikkema, Peter H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Ridgetown Campus, Ridgetown, ON N0P 2C0, Canada
关键词
crop injury; goosenecking; brace root malformation; cob deformity; Zea mays; CONYZA-CANADENSIS;
D O I
10.1139/cjps-2017-0241
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Six field trials were conducted at Ridgetown, ON, over a 2-yr period (2015 and 2016) to determine the tolerance of two corn hybrids to 2,4-D (560 and 1120 g a.i. ha(-1)) and glyphosate (1800 g a.e. ha(-1)) applied alone or in combination at stage VI, V3, or V5. In DeKalb DKC52-61 corn, 2,4-D caused as much as 24%, 16%, 11%, and 11% visible injury at 1 wk after each postemergence herbicide application (WAT), 2 WAT, 4 wk after the last postemergence herbicide application (WA-C), and 8 WA-C, respectively. Plant stand was not affected, but plant height decreased by 5 cm at 560 g a.i. ha(-1) and 7% at 1120 g a.i. ha(-1). As the application timing was delayed from stage VI to V5, there was a trend to increased injury at both 2,4-D rates. Corn yield decreased 8% with 2,4-D applied at 560 g a.i. ha(-1) and 12% at 1120 g a.i. ha(-1). In Pioneer P0094AM corn, 2,4-D caused as much as 16%, 9%, 7%, and 7% visible injury at 1 WAT, 2 WAT, 4 WA-C, and 8 WA-C, respectively. Plant height was not affected, but goosenecking and brace root malformation were increased as the rate of 2,4-D was increased. There was generally no difference between glyphosate rates (1800 vs 0 g a.e. ha(-1)) at the VI com stage but visible injury, goosenecking, and brace root malformation at other application timings was as much as 15%, 3%, and 19% greater when 2,4-D was applied in a tank mixture with glyphosate, respectively. Yield was reduced by 12% when 2,4-D (1120 g a.i. ha(-1)) was applied with glyphosate in the tank mixture.
引用
收藏
页码:889 / 896
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Influence of 2,4-D, dicamba, and glyphosate on clethodim efficacy of volunteer glyphosate-resistant corn
    Harre, Nick T.
    Young, Julie M.
    Young, Bryan G.
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 34 (03) : 394 - 401
  • [2] 2,4-D antagonizes glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant barnyard grass Echinochloa colona
    Li, Jingbo
    Han, Heping
    Bai, Lianyang
    Yu, Qin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PESTICIDE SCIENCE, 2020, 45 (1-2) : 109 - 113
  • [3] Glyphosate resistant soybean injury from 2,4-D spray tank contamination
    Soltani, Nader
    Nurse, Robert E.
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2016, 96 (05) : 734 - 736
  • [4] Tank mixture of glyphosate and 2,4-D applied on RR® maize crop
    Galon, Leandro
    Brunetto, Leonardo
    Loureiro da Silva, Antonio Marcos
    Soligo, Vinicius
    Cavaletti, Daniel Cristian
    da Silva, Alexandre Ferreira
    Gallina, Alessandra
    Franceschetti, Milena Barretta
    Forte, Cesar Tiago
    Perin, Gismael Francisco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART B-PESTICIDES FOOD CONTAMINANTS AND AGRICULTURAL WASTES, 2021, 56 (11) : 948 - 953
  • [5] Controlling Glyphosate-Resistant Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Cotton with Resistance to Glyphosate, 2,4-D, and Glufosinate
    Merchant, Rand M.
    Culpepper, A. Stanley
    Eure, Peter M.
    Richburg, John S.
    Braxton, L. Bo
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 28 (02) : 291 - 297
  • [6] Interaction of clethodim with glyphosate and/or 2,4-d at different doses and spray volumes in the control of glyphosate-resistant ryegrass
    Agostinetto, Dirceu
    Pigatto, Cassiano S.
    Zandona, Renan R.
    Neto, Roberto A.
    da Silva, Bruno M.
    Andres, Andre
    [J]. ADVANCES IN WEED SCIENCE, 2022, 40
  • [7] Non-2,4-D-resistant cotton response to glyphosate plus 2,4-D choline tank contamination
    Manuchehri, Misha R.
    Dotray, Peter A.
    Keeling, J. Wayne
    Morgan, Gaylon D.
    Byrd, Seth A.
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 34 (01) : 82 - 88
  • [8] Peanut response to 2,4-D plus glyphosate
    Daramola, Olumide S.
    Kharel, Prasanna
    Iboyi, Joseph E.
    Devkota, Pratap
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 37 (01) : 46 - 52
  • [9] Response of Wine Grape Cultivars to Simulated Drift Rates of 2,4-D, Dicamba, and Glyphosate, and 2,4-D or Dicamba Plus Glyphosate
    Mohseni-Moghadam, Mohsen
    Wolfe, Scott
    Dami, Imed
    Doohan, Douglas
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 30 (03) : 807 - 814
  • [10] Glyphosate plus 2,4-D Deposition, Absorption, and Efficacy on Glyphosate-Resistant Weed Species as Influenced by Broadcast Spray Nozzle
    Legleiter, Travis R.
    Young, Bryan G.
    Johnson, William G.
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 32 (02) : 141 - 149