Perampanel in patients with refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus in a neurological intensive care unit: A single-center audit of 30 patients

被引:28
|
作者
Rohracher, Alexandra [1 ,2 ]
Kalss, Gudrun [1 ,2 ]
Neuray, Caroline [1 ,2 ]
Hoefler, Julia [1 ,2 ]
Dobesberger, Judith [1 ,2 ]
Kuchukhidze, Giorgi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kreidenhuber, Rudolf [1 ,2 ]
Florea, Cristina [1 ,2 ]
Thomschewski, Aljoscha [1 ,2 ]
Novak, Helmut F. [1 ,2 ]
Pilz, Georg [1 ,2 ]
Leitinger, Markus [1 ,2 ]
Trinka, Eugen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Paracelsus Med Univ Salzburg, Christian Doppler Clin, Dept Neurol, Salzburg, Austria
[2] Ctr Cognit Neurosci Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
[3] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Neurol, Innsbruck, Austria
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor antagonist; high-dose perampanel; refractory status epilepticus; NONCONVULSIVE STATUS EPILEPTICUS; CLONIC STATUS EPILEPTICUS; MORTALITY; ADULTS; PHARMACORESISTANCE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; TRAFFICKING; PROGNOSIS; SCORE; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/epi.14494
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
In refractory status epilepticus (SE), -aminobutyric acidergic drugs become less effective and glutamate plays a major role in seizure perpetuation. Data on the efficacy of perampanel (PER) in treatment of refractory SE in humans are limited. Here, we present a single-center case series of patients with refractory SE who received PER orally in an intensive care unit. We retrospectively analyzed treatment response, outcome, and adverse effects of all patients with refractory SE in our Neurological Intensive Care Unit who received add-on PER between September 2012 and February 2018. Thirty patients with refractory SE (median = 72years, range = 18-91, 77% women) were included. In 14 patients (47%), a high-dose approach was used, with a median initial dose of 24mg (range = 16-32). In five patients (17%), SE could be terminated after PER administration (median dose = 6mg, range = 6-20mg, 2/5 patients in high-dose group). Clinical response was observed after a median of 24hours (range = 8-48hours), whereas electroencephalogram resolved after a median of 60hours (range = 12-72hours). Time to treatment response tended to be shorter in patients receiving high-dose PER (median clinical response = 16hours vs 18hours; electroencephalographic response = 24hours vs 72hours), but groups were too small for statistical analysis. Continuous cardiorespiratory monitoring showed no changes in cardiorespiratory function after standard and high-dose treatment. Elevated liver enzymes without clinical symptoms were observed after a median of 6days in seven of 30 patients (23%; 57% high dose vs 43% standard dose), of whom six also received treatment with phenytoin (PHT). Outcome was unfavorable (death, persistent vegetative state) in 13 patients (43%; 39% high dose vs 61% standard dose), and good recovery (no significant disability, moderate disability) was achieved in nine patients (56% high dose vs 44% standard dose). Oral PER in loading doses up to 32mg were well tolerated but could terminate SE only in a few patients (5/30; 17%). Long duration of SE, route of administration, and severe underlying brain dysfunction might be responsible for the modest result. An intravenous formulation is highly desired to explore the full clinical utility in the treatment of refractory SE.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 242
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Perampanel In Patients With Refractory And Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus In A Neurological Intensive Care Unit - A Single Centre Audit On 30 Patients
    Rohracher, A.
    Neuray, C.
    Kalss, G.
    Leitinger, M.
    Kreidenhuber, R.
    Kuchukhidze, G.
    Hoefler, J.
    Trinka, E.
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 2018, 59 : S222 - S222
  • [2] Perampanel in patients with refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus in a neurological intensive care unit
    Rohracher, A.
    Hoefler, J.
    Kalss, G.
    Leitinger, M.
    Kuchukhidze, G.
    Deak, I.
    Dobesberger, J.
    Novak, H.
    Pilz, G.
    Zerbs, A.
    Trinka, E.
    [J]. EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2015, 49 : 354 - 358
  • [3] PERAMPANEL IN PATIENTS WITH REFRACTORY AND SUPER-REFRACTORY STATUS EPILEPTICUS IN A NEUROLOGICAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT
    Rohracher, A.
    Kalss, G.
    Neuray, C.
    Dobesberger, J.
    Kuchukhidze, G.
    Hoefler, J.
    Leitinger, M.
    Trinka, E.
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 2016, 57 : 8 - 8
  • [4] TREATMENT OF SUPER-REFRACTORY STATUS EPILEPTICUS WITH PERAMPANEL IN AN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT
    Hoang, Quang
    Wohlt, Paul
    Rosenberg, Neil
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (12)
  • [5] Efficacy Of Perampanel In Refractory And Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus: The Evaluation In Asian Adult Neurological Intensive Care Unit
    Lim, S. -N.
    Chiang, H. -I.
    Wu, T.
    Tseng, W. -E. J.
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 2019, 60 : 158 - 159
  • [6] Perampanel in patients with refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus: add on therapy
    Yadee, T.
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 2023, 64 : 521 - 522
  • [7] Ketogenic Diet in the Treatment of Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus at a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Single-Center Experience
    Breu, Markus
    Hafele, Chiara
    Glatter, Sarah
    Trimmel-Schwahofer, Petra
    Golej, Johann
    Male, Christoph
    Feucht, Martha
    Dressler, Anastasia
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [8] Perampanel Treatment For Refractory Status Epilepticus In A Neurological Intensive Care Unit
    Ho, C-J.
    Lin, C-H.
    Lu, Y-T.
    Shih, F-Y.
    Hsu, C-W.
    Tsai, W-C.
    Tsai, M. H.
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 2019, 60 : 150 - 151
  • [9] Perampanel Treatment for Refractory Status Epilepticus in a Neurological Intensive Care Unit
    Chen-Jui Ho
    Chih-Hsiang Lin
    Yan-Ting Lu
    Fu-Yuan Shih
    Che-Wei Hsu
    Wan-Chen Tsai
    Meng-Han Tsai
    [J]. Neurocritical Care, 2019, 31 : 24 - 29
  • [10] Perampanel Treatment for Refractory Status Epilepticus in a Neurological Intensive Care Unit
    Ho, Chen-Jui
    Lin, Chih-Hsiang
    Lu, Yan-Ting
    Shih, Fu-Yuan
    Hsu, Che-Wei
    Tsai, Wan-Chen
    Tsai, Meng-Han
    [J]. NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 2019, 31 (01) : 24 - 29