On tense and aspect in the Gaxi Horpa verb

被引:3
|
作者
Tian, Qianzi
Sun, Jackson T. -S.
机构
[1] Yunnan Normal Univ, Kunming, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[2] Acad Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Rgyalrongic subgroup; Horpa language cluster; Central Horpa; verbal tense-aspect system; language contact and innovation;
D O I
10.1075/lali.00040.tia
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Horpa is a little-studied language cluster in Sichuan falling under the Rgyalrongic subgroup in Sino-Tibetan. This study is a first attempt to explicate the verbal tense-aspect system of Gexi, a variety of Central Horpa in the Horpa language cluster. Conservative Rgyalrongic languages generally utilize a tripartite tense-aspect system with an aspectual (perfective vs. imperfective) distinction marked by prefixes, and a tense distinction marked by means of stem alternation. The Gexi tense-aspect system deviates drastically from the pan-Rgyalrongic norm, owing to a number of striking innovations it has undergone: (a) a sweeping reduction of stem variation leading to atrophy of tense-marking via stem alternations; (b) transformation of the pan-Rgyalrongic perfective structure into an anterior (relative past) verb form and development of the prefix da- into a general anterior prefix, often carrying an extended resultative marking function; (c) innovation of a periphrastic imperfective and a related durative imperfective. The important morphological innovations identified in this article appear to be inherently motivated as well as induced from contact with the locally dominant Tibetan language.
引用
收藏
页码:452 / 469
页数:18
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] THE CREATION OF TENSE AND ASPECT SYSTEMS IN THE LANGUAGES OF THE WORLD
    BYBEE, JL
    DAHL, O
    [J]. STUDIES IN LANGUAGE, 1989, 13 (01): : 51 - 103
  • [2] Bybee Joan L., 1994, The Evolution of Grammar
  • [3] Comrie Bernard., 1976, ASPECT INTRO STUDY V
  • [4] Dahl Osten., 1985, Tense and Aspect Systems
  • [5] Still mirative after all these years
    DeLancey, Scott
    [J]. LINGUISTIC TYPOLOGY, 2012, 16 (03) : 529 - 564
  • [6] Gates J. P., 2013, 3 WORKSH SIN LANG SI
  • [7] Gengawengmu, 2010, SICHUAN MINZU XUEYUA, V19, P7
  • [8] "Mirativity" does not exist: hdug in "Lhasa" Tibetan and other suspects
    Hill, Nathan W.
    [J]. LINGUISTIC TYPOLOGY, 2012, 16 (03) : 389 - 433
  • [9] Huang Bufan., 1991, Zangmian yu shiwu zhong [Fifteen Tibeto-Burman Languages], P1
  • [10] Huang Bufan, 2007, LAWURONGYU YANJIU