Faster Aspart Versus Insulin Aspart as Part of a Basal-Bolus Regimen in Inadequately Controlled Type 2 Diabetes: The onset 2 Trial

被引:83
|
作者
Bowering, Keith [1 ]
Case, Christopher [2 ]
Harvey, John [3 ]
Reeves, Michael [4 ]
Sampson, Michael [5 ]
Strzinek, Robert [6 ]
Bretler, Ditte-Marie [7 ]
Bang, Rikke Beck [7 ]
Bode, Bruce W. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Div Endocrinol & Metab, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Jefferson City Med Grp, Jefferson City, MO USA
[3] Bangor Univ, Maelor Hosp, Gladstone Ctr, Wrexham, Wales
[4] Diabet Clin Trials, Chattanooga, TN USA
[5] Norfolk & Norwich Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Diabet Endocrinol & Gen Med, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[6] Protenium Clin Res, Hurst, TX USA
[7] Novo Nordisk AS, Soborg, Denmark
[8] Atlanta Diabet Associates, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
COMPLICATIONS; HYPOGLYCEMIA; MANAGEMENT; ADULTS;
D O I
10.2337/dc16-1770
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE This multicenter, double-blind, treat-to-target, phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) versus insulin aspart (IAsp) in adults with type 2 diabetes receiving basal insulin and oral antidiabetic agents. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The primary end point was HbA(1c) change from baseline after 26 weeks' treatment. After an 8-week run-in to optimize basal insulin, subjects were randomized (1:1) to mealtime faster aspart (n=345) or IAsp(n =344), titrated using a simple daily patient-driven algorithm, plus insulin glargine U100 and metformin. RESULTS HbA(1c) change was -1.38% (faster aspart) and -1.36% (IAsp); mean HbA(1c) was 6.6% for both groups. Faster aspart demonstrated noninferiority versus IAsp in reducing HbA(1c) (estimated treatment difference [ETD] [95% CI] -0.02% [-0.15; 0.10]). Both treatments improved postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) control; the PPG increment (liquid meal test) was statistically significant in favor of faster aspart after 1 h (ETD [95% CI] -0.59 mmol/L [-1.09; -0.09]; -10.63mg/dL [-19.56; -1.69]; P=0.0198), but not after 2-4 h. Change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose, body weight, and overall severe/blood glucose-confirmed hypoglycemia rates (rate ratio [RR] [95% CI] 1.09 [0.88; 1.36]) were similar between treatments. Postmeal hypoglycemia (022 h) rates were 2.27 (faster aspart) and 1.49 (IAsp) per patient-year of exposure (RR [95% CI] 1.60 [1.13; 2.27]). CONCLUSIONS Faster aspart and IAsp were confirmed noninferior in a basal-bolus regimen regarding change from baseline in HbA(1c). Faster aspart improved 1-h PPG with no differences in 224-h PPG versus IAsp. Overall hypoglycemia rates were similar except for an increase in 022-h postmeal hypoglycemia with faster aspart.
引用
收藏
页码:951 / 957
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Insulin detemir and insulin aspart:: a promising basal-bolus regimen for type 2 diabetes
    Raslová, K
    Bogoev, M
    Raz, I
    Leth, G
    Gall, MA
    Hancu, N
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2004, 66 (02) : 193 - 201
  • [2] Faster-acting insulin aspart vs insulin aspart as part of basal-bolus therapy improves postprandial glycaemic control in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes: the onset® 2 trial
    Bowering, K.
    Case, C.
    Harvey, J.
    Reeves, M.
    Sampson, M.
    Strzinek, R.
    Bretler, D. -M.
    Bang, R. B.
    Bode, B. W.
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2016, 59 : S399 - S400
  • [3] Faster-acting insulin aspart vs insulin aspart as part of basal-bolus therapy improves postprandial glycaemic control in uncontrolled Type 2 diabetes in the double-blinded onset 2 trial
    Saravanan, P.
    Bowering, K.
    Case, C.
    Harvey, J.
    Reeves, M.
    Sampson, M.
    Strzinek, R.
    Bretler, D. M.
    Bang, R. B.
    Bode, B. W.
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2017, 34 : 21 - 21
  • [4] Double-blind mealtime faster-acting insulin aspart vs insulin aspart in basal-bolus improves glycaemic control in Type 1 diabetes: the onset 1 trial
    Russell-Jones, D.
    Bode, B. W.
    De Block, C.
    Franek, E.
    Heller, S.
    Mathieu, C.
    Philis-Tsimikas, A.
    Rose, L.
    Woo, V.
    Osterskov, A. B.
    Graungaard, T.
    Bergenstal, R.
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2017, 34 : 8 - 8
  • [5] Insulin detemir and insulin aspart:: A promising basal-bolus regimen for type 2 diabetes (vol 66, pg 193, 2004)
    Raslová, K
    Bogoev, M
    Raz, I
    Leth, G
    Gall, MA
    Hâncu, N
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2006, 72 (01) : 112 - 112
  • [6] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF INSULIN DEGLUDEC/INSULIN ASPART TWICE DAILY VERSUS BASAL-BOLUS FULL REGIMEN IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS IN ALGERIA
    Sellam, Y.
    Malek, R.
    Semrouni, M.
    Belhadj, M.
    Zekri, S.
    Brouri, M.
    Arbouche, Z.
    Nouri, N.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S511 - S511
  • [7] Faster-Acting Insulin Aspart vs. Insulin Aspart as Part of Basal-Bolus Therapy Improves Postprandial Glycemic Control in Uncontrolled T2D in the Double- Blinded Onset® 2 Trial
    Bowering, Keith
    Case, Christopher
    Harvey, John
    Reeves, Michael
    Sampson, Mike
    Strzinek, Robert
    Bretler, Ditte-Marie
    Bang, Rikke Beck
    Bode, Bruce W.
    [J]. DIABETES, 2016, 65 : A63 - A63
  • [8] Meta-analysis of insulin aspart versus regular human insulin used in a basal-bolus regimen for the treatment of diabetes mellitus
    Heller, Simon
    Bode, Bruce
    Kozlovski, Plamen
    Svendsen, Anne Louise
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2013, 5 (04) : 482 - 491
  • [9] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF SWITCHING TO INSULIN ASPART FROM HUMAN SOLUBLE INSULIN IN CHINESE PATIENTS WITH TYPE-2 DIABETES ON A BASAL-BOLUS REGIMEN
    Ji, Q. H.
    Ye, Q.
    Zhang, Y. Z.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (03) : A164 - A165
  • [10] Cost-effectiveness analysis of basal-bolus therapy of type 1 diabetes using insulin detemir plus insulin aspart versus NPH plus insulin aspart regimens
    Valentine, WJ
    Wittrup-Jensen, KU
    Häuser, C
    Roze, S
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2005, 48 : A334 - A334