Behavioural responses to Covid-19 health certification: a rapid review

被引:37
|
作者
Drury, John [1 ]
Mao, Guanlan [1 ]
John, Ann [2 ]
Kamal, Atiya [3 ]
Rubin, G. James [4 ]
Stott, Clifford [5 ]
Vandrevala, Tushna [6 ]
Marteau, Theresa M. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Sch Psychol, Brighton, E Sussex, England
[2] Swansea Univ, Populat Data Sci, Swansea, W Glam, Wales
[3] Birmingham City Univ, Dept Psychol, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[4] Kings Coll London, Dept Psychol Med, London, England
[5] Keele Univ, Sch Psychol, Keele, Staffs, England
[6] Univ Kingston, Dept Psychol, Kingston Upon Thames, Surrey, England
[7] Univ Cambridge, Behav & Hlth Res Unit, Cambridge, England
关键词
Covid-19; SARS-CoV-2; Covid-status certification; Health certification; Vaccine passport; Mandatory vaccination; Vaccination certificate; Immunity certificate; Immunity passport; Health passport; IMMUNITY PASSPORTS;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-021-11166-0
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Covid-status certification - certificates for those who test negative for the SARS-CoV-2 virus, test positive for antibodies, or who have been vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 - has been proposed to enable safer access to a range of activities. Realising these benefits will depend in part upon the behavioural and social impacts of certification. The aim of this rapid review was to describe public attitudes towards certification, and its possible impact on uptake of testing and vaccination, protective behaviours, and crime. Method A search was undertaken in peer-reviewed databases, pre-print databases, and the grey literature, from 2000 to December 2020. Studies were included if they measured attitudes towards or behavioural consequences of health certificates based on one of three indices of Covid-19 status: test-negative result for current infectiousness, test-positive for antibodies conferring natural immunity, or vaccination(s) conferring immunity. Results Thirty-three papers met the inclusion criteria, only three of which were rated as low risk of bias. Public attitudes were generally favourable towards the use of immunity certificates for international travel, but unfavourable towards their use for access to work and other activities. A significant minority was strongly opposed to the use of certificates of immunity for any purpose. The limited evidence suggested that intention to get vaccinated varied with the activity enabled by certification or vaccination (e.g., international travel). Where vaccination is seen as compulsory this could lead to unwillingness to accept a subsequent vaccination. There was some evidence that restricting access to settings and activities to those with antibody test certificates may lead to deliberate exposure to infection in a minority. Behaviours that reduce transmission may decrease upon health certificates based on any of the three indices of Covid-19 status, including physical distancing and handwashing. Conclusions The limited evidence suggests that health certification in relation to COVID-19 - outside of the context of international travel - has the potential for harm as well as benefit. Realising the benefits while minimising the harms will require real-time evaluations allowing modifications to maximise the potential contribution of certification to enable safer access to a range of activities.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Behavioural responses to Covid-19 health certification: a rapid review
    John Drury
    Guanlan Mao
    Ann John
    Atiya Kamal
    G. James Rubin
    Clifford Stott
    Tushna Vandrevala
    Theresa M. Marteau
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 21
  • [2] International Public Health Responses to COVID-19 Outbreak: A Rapid Review
    Tabari, Parinaz
    Amini, Mitra
    Moghadami, Mohsen
    Moosavi, Mahsa
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 45 (03) : 157 - 169
  • [3] Rapid review of COVID-19
    Korownyk, Christina
    Allan, G. Michael
    Dugre, Nicolas
    Lindblad, Adrienne J.
    McCormack, James
    Kolber, Michael R.
    [J]. CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2020, 66 (06) : 429 - 429
  • [4] The impact of COVID-19 on the mental health workforce: A rapid review
    Crocker, Kaitlyn M.
    Gnatt, Inge
    Haywood, Darren
    Butterfield, Ingrid
    Bhat, Ravi
    Lalitha, Anoop Raveendran Nair
    Jenkins, Zoe M.
    Castle, David J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2023, 32 (02) : 420 - 445
  • [5] National primary care responses to COVID-19: a rapid review of the literature
    Haldane, Victoria
    Zhang, Zhitong
    Abbas, Raja Faisal
    Dodd, Warren
    Lau, Lincoln L.
    Kidd, Michael R.
    Rouleau, Katherine
    Zou, Guanyang
    Chao, Zhuo
    Upshur, Ross E. G.
    Walley, John
    Wei, Xiaolin
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (12):
  • [6] Behavioural determinants of COVID-19 vaccination acceptance among healthcare workers: a rapid review
    Crawshaw, J.
    Konnyu, K.
    Castillo, G.
    van Allen, Z.
    Grimshaw, J. M.
    Presseau, J.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 210 : 123 - 133
  • [7] Rapid antigen testing in COVID-19 responses
    Garcia-Finana, Marta
    Buchan, Iain E.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2021, 372 (6542) : 571 - 572
  • [8] COVID-19 Risk Factors Among Health Workers: A Rapid Review
    Mhango, Malizgani
    Dzobo, Mathias
    Chitungo, Itai
    Dzinamarira, Tafadzwa
    [J]. SAFETY AND HEALTH AT WORK, 2020, 11 (03) : 262 - 265
  • [9] An online RCT on behavioural expectations effects of COVID-19 certification policies in England
    Mills, Freya
    Carter, Holly
    Benny, Liza
    Barnard, Matt
    Symons, Charles
    [J]. VACCINE: X, 2023, 15
  • [10] Antibody Responses in COVID-19: A Review
    Chvatal-Medina, Mateo
    Mendez-Cortina, Yorjagis
    Patino, Pablo J.
    Velilla, Paula A.
    Rugeles, Maria T.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2021, 12