Stakeholders Evaluation on Educational Quality of Higher Education

被引:4
|
作者
Abidin, Munirul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Islamic Educ Fac, Malang, Indonesia
关键词
educational quality; customer; stakeholder; islamic higher education; satisfaction; performance; EMPLOYABILITY SKILLS; COMPETENCES; PERCEPTIONS; CHALLENGES; ATTRIBUTES; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.29333/iji.2021.14317a
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Knowing the stakeholder's perception of educational quality is essential for Higher Education (HE) institutions because it reflects the market acceptance of its products. The study aims to analyze stakeholders' satisfaction with HE's quality through the performance of its graduates. Data collected through surveys to 258 customers in 15 educational institutions and analyzed quantitatively. The researcher used the Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) and Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) to explain the gap between stakeholders' satisfaction and alumni performance. This research found that customer satisfaction on the quality of graduates of researched university falls within the range of 'satisfied' categories and quality of graduates' performance, or skill has been rated 'good' by Customer. However, there are still three competencies considered 'sufficient' by Customers. This study also finds a gap between customer satisfaction and graduates' performance, which the mean reaches -1.16. The biggest gaps are in the logical, analytical, and problem-solving competencies with the gap score -1.56, and innovation and creativity competencies with the gap score -1.59. This research implies higher education institutions to improve these competencies that are considered lacking through the learning process and other appropriate programs to meet customer satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 308
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EVALUATION OF THE QUALITY OF ELECTRONIC EDUCATIONAL COURSES FOR HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS
    Melnyk, Oksana M.
    Lytvynova, Svitlana H.
    Zaiets, Svitlana V.
    [J]. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES AND LEARNING TOOLS, 2023, 93 (01) : 117 - 134
  • [3] Stakeholders in Higher Education Quality Assurance: Richness in Diversity?
    Beerkens, Maarja
    Udam, Maiki
    [J]. HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY, 2017, 30 (03) : 341 - 359
  • [4] Stakeholders in Higher Education Quality Assurance: Richness in Diversity?
    Maarja Beerkens
    Maiki Udam
    [J]. Higher Education Policy, 2017, 30 : 341 - 359
  • [5] APPLICATION OF SERVQUAL METHOD FOR EVALUATION OF QUALITY OF EDUCATIONAL SERVICES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION
    Ulewicz, R.
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2014, 9 : 254 - 264
  • [6] CONSIDERATIONS ON THE QUALITY OF THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS IN HIGHER EDUCATION
    Andronescu, Ecaterina
    Solomon, Gheorghe
    Bratosin, Ionela-Oana
    [J]. QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION, VOL 2, 2010, : 3 - 6
  • [7] Quality management of educational activities in higher education
    Vaganova, Olga, I
    Gilyazova, Olga S.
    Gileva, Anzhela, V
    Yarygina, Nelya A.
    Bekirova, Elmira Sh
    [J]. AMAZONIA INVESTIGA, 2020, 9 (28): : 74 - 82
  • [8] Educational quality, discourse and power in Higher Education
    Cabrera Hernandez, Dulce Maria
    [J]. ATENAS, 2018, 1 (41): : 198 - 212
  • [9] A NEW FRAMEWORK FOR QUALITY DIMENSIONS IN HIGHER EDUCATION - A STAKEHOLDERS PERSPECTIVE
    Deselnicu, D. C.
    Ilioi, D.
    Chirila, C.
    Albu, L.
    Matveev, A.
    [J]. QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION, VOL 2, 2010, : 415 - 418
  • [10] Quality and Evaluation in Higher Education
    Arcega, Francisco J.
    [J]. COMPUTERS SUPPORTED EDUCATION, 2017, 739 : 14 - 24