Representativeness of Social Media in Great Britain: Investigating Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Pinterest, Google plus , and Instagram

被引:99
|
作者
Blank, Grant [1 ]
Lutz, Christoph [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Oxford Internet Inst, 1 St Giles, Oxford OX1 3JS, England
[2] Handelshoyskolen BI, Oslo, Norway
关键词
digital divide; representativeness; social media; Facebook; Twitter; LinkedIn; Instagram; Pinterest; Google; DIGITAL DIVIDE; INTERNET; ACCESS; TWEET;
D O I
10.1177/0002764217717559
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Sociological studies show that Internet access, skills, uses, and outcomes vary between different population segments. However, we lack differentiated statistical evidence of the social characteristics of users of distinct social media platforms. We address this issue using a representative survey of Great Britain and investigate the social characteristics of six major social media platforms. We find that age and socioeconomic status are driving forces of severalbut not allof these platforms. The findings suggest that no social media platform is representative of the general population. The unrepresentativeness has major implications for research that uses social media as a data source. Social media data cannot be used to generalize to any population other than themselves.
引用
收藏
页码:741 / 756
页数:16
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Social Media Competition for User Satisfaction: A Niche Analysis of Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Pinterest, and Twitter
    Kweon, Sang-Hee
    Kang, Bo Young
    Ma, Liyao
    Guo, Wei
    Tian, Zaimin
    Kim, Se-jin
    Kweon, Heaji
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2020, 965 : 239 - 249
  • [2] Investigating Social Networking applications on smartphones detecting Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and Google plus artefacts on Android and iOS platforms
    Dezfouli, Farhood Norouzizadeh
    Dehghantanha, Ali
    Eterovic-Soric, Brett
    Choo, Kim-Kwang Raymond
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2016, 48 (04) : 469 - 488
  • [3] Social Media Engagement: An Analysis of the Impact of Social Media Campaigns on Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn
    Mishnick, Nicole
    Wise, Dana
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION, 2024, 7 (03): : 535 - 549
  • [4] Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest and co.: body image and social media
    Genevieve Pepin
    Natalie Endresz
    [J]. Journal of Eating Disorders, 3 (Suppl 1)
  • [5] Mining the Social Web: Data Mining Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google plus , GitHub, and More, 2 edition
    Robertson, Angela
    [J]. TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION, 2014, 61 (03) : 209 - 209
  • [6] Managing your social campaign strategy using Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube & Pinterest: An interview with Dana Howard, social media marketing manager
    Howard, Dana
    Mangold, W. Glynn
    Johnston, Tim
    [J]. BUSINESS HORIZONS, 2014, 57 (05) : 657 - 665
  • [7] Women in Planetary Science: Career Resources and e-Mentoring on Blogs, Twitter, Facebook, Google plus , and Pinterest
    Niebur, Susan M.
    Singer, Kelsi
    Gardner-Vandy, Kathryn
    [J]. CONNECTING PEOPLE TO SCIENCE: A NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE EDUCATION AND PUBLIC OUTREACH, 2012, 457 : 313 - +
  • [8] Motivation Scale for Using Social Network Sites: Comparative Study between Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat and LinkedIn
    Masciantonio, Alexandra
    Bourguignon, David
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICA BELGICA, 2023, 63 (01) : 30 - 43
  • [9] Social Media for Global Education: Pearls and Pitfalls of Using Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram
    Thomas, Rachel Black
    Johnson, Pamela T.
    Fishman, Elliot K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 15 (10) : 1513 - 1516
  • [10] Academic Ophthalmology Departments and their use of Facebook, Instagram and Twitter Social Media Pages
    Melendez, Robert F.
    Angadi, Pavan
    Sledz, Elisabeth
    Acosta, Gabriella
    Griego, Marisa
    Sherpa, Mingma
    Teng, Christine
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2018, 59 (09)