Hemocompatibility of different burn wound dressings

被引:12
|
作者
Denzinger, Markus [1 ]
Held, Manuel [1 ]
Scheffler, Hanna [1 ,3 ]
Haag, Hanna [2 ]
Nussler, Andreas K. [3 ]
Wendel, Hans Peter [2 ]
Schlensak, Christian [2 ]
Daigeler, Adrien [1 ]
Krajewski, Stefanie [2 ]
机构
[1] Eberhard Karls Univ Tuebingen, BG Trauma Ctr, Dept Plast Reconstruct Hand & Burn Surg, Tubingen, Germany
[2] Eberhard Karls Univ Tuebingen, Clin Res Lab, Dept Thorac Cardiac & Vasc Surg, Tubingen, Germany
[3] Eberhard Karls Univ Tuebingen, BG Trauma Ctr, Siegfried Weller Inst, Tubingen, Germany
关键词
ALTERNATIVE COMPLEMENT PATHWAY; ACTIVATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; INFLAMMATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PLATELETS; PLASMA; SYSTEM; INJURY; BLOOD;
D O I
10.1111/wrr.12739
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
A variety of wound dressing are available for burns. Furthermore, although their impacts on wound healing have been studied sufficiently, their effects on blood remain unclear. Meanwhile, this aspect is extremely important, since blood interacts with the wound dressing, especially in extensive burn injuries. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the hemocompatibility and immunogenicity of different burn wound dressings. Accordingly, human whole blood (n = 5) was anticoagulated with heparin, treated with different wound dressings and incubated at 37 degrees C for 30 minutes. Different parameters for coagulation and hemocompatibility were evaluated before and after incubation. Consequently, Jelonet, Xenoderm, and Matriderm showed higher TAT-III concentrations, Jelonet, Xenoderm, EZ Derm, and Matriderm were higher beta-thromboglobulin; EZ Derm and Burntec showed higher SC5b-9 concentrations after incubation with whole blood. Our ex vivo study provided initial insights into the hemocompatibility and immunogenicity of different burn wound dressings. Moreover, Xenografts (Xenoderm and EZ Derm), Jelonet and Matriderm showed a hemostyptic effect, while EZ Derm and Burntec activated the complement system. Therefore, further studies must be conducted to analyze the possible effects in vivo.
引用
收藏
页码:470 / 476
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] BURN WOUND DRESSINGS - A REVIEW
    QUEEN, D
    EVANS, JH
    GAYLOR, JDS
    COURTNEY, JM
    REID, WH
    [J]. BURNS, 1987, 13 (03) : 218 - 228
  • [2] Dressings for burn wound: a review
    Noor, Abid
    Afzal, Ali
    Masood, Rashid
    Khaliq, Zubair
    Ahmad, Sheraz
    Ahmad, Faheem
    Qadir, Muhammad-Bilal
    Irfan, Muhammad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2022, 57 (12) : 6536 - 6572
  • [3] Dressings for burn wound: a review
    Abid Noor
    Ali Afzal
    Rashid Masood
    Zubair Khaliq
    Sheraz Ahmad
    Faheem Ahmad
    Muhammad-Bilal Qadir
    Muhammad Irfan
    [J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2022, 57 : 6536 - 6572
  • [4] BURN WOUND MANAGEMENT WITH BIOLOGIC DRESSINGS
    BROMBERG, BE
    [J]. NEW YORK STATE JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1970, 70 (12) : 1645 - &
  • [5] PRECLINICAL ASSESSMENT OF BURN WOUND DRESSINGS
    QUEEN, D
    EVANS, JH
    GAYLOR, JDS
    COURTNEY, JM
    REID, WH
    [J]. BURNS, 1986, 12 (03) : 161 - 166
  • [6] BURN WOUND DRESSINGS .2. EFFECT ON WOUND SEPSIS
    DRESSLER, DP
    SKORNIK, WA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA, 1971, 11 (04): : 325 - &
  • [7] Cytotoxicity testing of burn wound dressings: first results
    M. Hajská
    J. Dragúňová
    J. Koller
    [J]. Cell and Tissue Banking, 2017, 18 : 143 - 151
  • [8] Current status of Biological dressings in the burn wound healing
    Mathangi, Ramakrishnan K.
    Jayaraman, V
    Mary, Babu
    [J]. 15TH WORLD CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFEDERATION FOR PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY (IPRAS), 2009, : 89 - +
  • [9] Cytotoxicity testing of burn wound dressings: first results
    Hajska, M.
    Dragunova, J.
    Koller, J.
    [J]. CELL AND TISSUE BANKING, 2017, 18 (02) : 143 - 151
  • [10] Investigation of adhesion of modern wound dressings: a comparative analysis of 56 different wound dressings
    Klode, J.
    Schoettler, L.
    Stoffels, I.
    Koerber, A.
    Schadendorf, D.
    Dissemond, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2011, 25 (08) : 933 - 939