There is a broad philosophical consensus that both children's and prospective parents' interests are relevant to the justification of a right to parent. Against this view, I argue that it is impermissible to sacrifice children's interests for the sake of advancing adults' interest in child-rearing. Therefore, the allocation of the moral right to parent should track the child's, and not the potential parent's, interest. This revisionary thesis is moderated by two qualifications. First, parents lack the moral right to exclude others from associating with the child. Second, newborns' relationship with their gestational mother often deserves protection.
机构:
No Arizona Univ, Ecol Restorat Inst, POB 15017, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USANo Arizona Univ, Ecol Restorat Inst, POB 15017, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
Esch, Bryce E.
Waltz, Amy E. M.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
No Arizona Univ, Ecol Restorat Inst, POB 15017, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USANo Arizona Univ, Ecol Restorat Inst, POB 15017, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
Waltz, Amy E. M.
Wasserman, Tzeidle N.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
No Arizona Univ, Ecol Restorat Inst, POB 15017, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USANo Arizona Univ, Ecol Restorat Inst, POB 15017, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
Wasserman, Tzeidle N.
Kalies, Elizabeth L.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
No Arizona Univ, Ecol Restorat Inst, POB 15017, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
Nature Conservancy, 334 Blackwell St, Durham, NC 27701 USANo Arizona Univ, Ecol Restorat Inst, POB 15017, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA