The use of everyday technology; a comparison of older persons with cognitive impairments' self-reports and their proxies' reports

被引:3
|
作者
Jakobsson, Elin [1 ]
Nygard, Louise [1 ]
Kottorp, Anders [2 ]
Olsson, Cecilia Brakenhielm [3 ]
Malinowsky, Camilla [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Neurobiol Care Sci & Soc, Div Occupat Therapy, Box 23200, SE-14183 Huddinge, Sweden
[2] Malmo Univ, Fac Hlth & Soc, Malmo, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Allied Hlth Profess Funct, Huddinge, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Cognitive impairment; everyday technology; older persons; dementia; proxy; IADL; STAGE ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION; PEOPLE; DEMENTIA; ADULTS; ABILITY; RATINGS; RECOMMENDATIONS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1177/0308022620954117
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Introduction Older persons with cognitive impairment have often been disregarded in providing information on their own perceptions. This study explored the number of relevant everyday technologies and the ability to use everyday technologies as perceived by persons with cognitive impairment in comparison with their proxies' estimates using the Short Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire. Method In this cross-sectional study, persons with cognitive impairment (n = 21) and their proxies (n = 21) were interviewed on separate occasions with the Short Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire, which measures the number of relevant everyday technologies and the ability to use everyday technologies. The data were analysed with t-tests, z-comparisons, and Fisher's exact test. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Results At the group level, no significant differences were found between persons with cognitive impairments' perceptions and their proxies' estimates regarding the number of relevant everyday technologies or the ability to use everyday technologies. On the individual level, significant differences were found in the ability measures within four out of the 21 dyads. Conclusion The persons with cognitive impairment and their proxies verified each other's responses, providing evidence that persons with cognitive impairment should be the primary source for information about their own everyday technology use.
引用
收藏
页码:446 / 455
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Self-reports of everyday prospective memory among older and younger adults
    Reese, C
    Kominsky, T
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 2005, 45 : 616 - 617
  • [2] The validity of self-reports of physician use among the older population
    Schmitz, MF
    Russell, DW
    Cutrona, CE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED GERONTOLOGY, 2002, 21 (02) : 203 - 219
  • [3] A COMPARISON OF STUTTERERS AND NONSTUTTERERS AFFECTIVE, COGNITIVE, AND BEHAVIORAL SELF-REPORTS
    WATSON, JB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1988, 31 (03): : 377 - 385
  • [4] ELDERLY PERSONS SELF-REPORTS OF ORAL HEALTH - COMPARISON TO CLINICAL FINDINGS
    READ, W
    WALSH, D
    ONEILL, M
    WILSON, J
    RATENER, P
    MILGROM, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1977, 56 : B95 - B95
  • [5] Self-Reports of Hand Function in Persons with Diabetes
    Poole, Janet
    Gonzales, Ivyrose
    Tedesco, Tomacita
    [J]. OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN HEALTH CARE, 2010, 24 (03) : 239 - 248
  • [6] VALIDITY OF SELF-REPORTS OF CAFFEINE USE
    KENNEDY, JS
    ENGELHARDT, N
    LEDUC, BW
    HARMATZ, JS
    SHADER, RI
    GREENBLATT, DJ
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1987, 41 (02) : 216 - 216
  • [7] VALIDITY OF SELF-REPORTS OF CAFFEINE USE
    KENNEDY, JS
    VONMOLTKE, LL
    HARMATZ, JS
    ENGELHARDT, N
    GREENBLATT, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1991, 31 (07): : 677 - 680
  • [8] Cognitive psychology and self-reports: Models and methods
    Jared B. Jobe
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2003, 12 : 219 - 227
  • [9] Cognitive psychology and self-reports: Models and methods
    Jobe, JB
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2003, 12 (03) : 219 - 227
  • [10] COMPARISON OF ALCOHOLICS SELF-REPORTS OF DRINKING BEHAVIOR WITH REPORTS OF COLLATERAL INFORMANTS
    MAISTO, SA
    SOBELL, LC
    SOBELL, MB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1979, 47 (01) : 106 - 112