Primary care quality indicators for children: measuring quality in UK general practice

被引:14
|
作者
Gill, Peter J. [1 ]
O'Neill, Braden [2 ]
Rose, Peter [3 ]
Mant, David [3 ]
Harnden, Anthony [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Paediat, Hosp Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Oxford, England
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE | 2014年 / 64卷 / 629期
关键词
clinical guidelines; paediatrics; primary health care; quality indicator; NOMINAL GROUP TECHNIQUE; UNITED-STATES; ENGLAND; HEALTH;
D O I
10.3399/bjgp14X682813
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Child health care is an important part of the UK general practice workload; in 2009 children aged <15 years accounted for 10.9% of consultations. However, only 1.2% of the UK's Quality and Outcomes Framework pay-for-performance incentive points relate specifically to children. Aim To improve the quality of care provided for children and adolescents by defining a set of quality indicators that reflect evidence-based national guidelines and are feasible to audit using routine computerised clinical records. Design and setting Multi-step consensus methodology in UK general practice. Method Four-step development process: selection of priority issues (applying nominal group methodology), systematic review of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) clinical guidelines, translation of guideline recommendations into quality indicators, and assessment of their validity and implementation feasibility (applying consensus methodology used in selecting QOF indicators). Results Of the 296 national guidelines published, 48 were potentially relevant to children in primary care, but only 123 of 1863 recommendations (6.6%) met selection criteria for translation into 56 potential quality indicators. A further 13 potential indicators were articulated after review of existing quality indicators and standards. Assessment of the validity and feasibility of implementation of these 69 candidate indicators by a clinical expert group identified 35 with median scores >= 8 on a 9-point Likert scale. However, only seven of the 35 achieved a GRADE rating >1 (were based on more than expert opinion). Conclusion Producing valid primary care quality indicators for children is feasible but difficult. These indicators require piloting before wide adoption but have the potential to raise the standard of primary care for all children.
引用
收藏
页码:E752 / E757
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using quality indicators to measure the quality of general practice care in Germany
    Beyer, Martin
    Chenot, Regine
    Erler, Antje
    Gerlach, Ferdinand M.
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2011, 105 (01): : 13 - 20
  • [2] Quality indicators: Defining and measuring quality in psychiatric care for adults and children
    Trevino, JJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 65 (04) : 585 - 585
  • [3] INCORPORATING DEMENTIA QUALITY INDICATORS INTO PRIMARY CARE PRACTICE
    Sloane, P. D.
    Kaufer, D. I.
    Lathren, C.
    Dulin, M.
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 2012, 52 : 28 - 28
  • [4] Quality indicators for general practice
    Wilcock, M
    Mackenzie, IF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE, 1999, 21 (03): : 357 - 357
  • [6] The impact of the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) on general practice quality of care
    Campbell, S.
    [J]. DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2009, 134 : S323 - S323
  • [7] General practitioners’ views on quality markers for children in UK primary care: a qualitative study
    Peter J Gill
    Jenny Hislop
    David Mant
    Anthony Harnden
    [J]. BMC Family Practice, 13
  • [8] General practitioners' views on quality markers for children in UK primary care: a qualitative study
    Gill, Peter J.
    Hislop, Jenny
    Mant, David
    Harnden, Anthony
    [J]. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2012, 13
  • [10] The relationship between general practice characteristics and quality of care: A national survey of quality indicators used in the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework, 2004-5
    Ashworth M.
    Armstrong D.
    [J]. BMC Family Practice, 7 (1)