Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials testing the safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Evidence-base for practise and implications for research

被引:10
|
作者
Gupta, Tejpal [1 ]
Kannan, Sadhana [2 ]
Kalra, Babusha [1 ]
Thakkar, Prafulla [3 ]
机构
[1] Homi Bhabha Natl Inst HBNI, Adv Ctr Treatment Res & Educ Canc ACTREC, Tata Mem Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol,Clin Res Ctr, Navi Mumbai, India
[2] Homi Bhabha Natl Inst HBNI, Adv Ctr Treatment Res & Educ Canc ACTREC, Tata Mem Ctr, Clin Res Ctr,Clin Res Secretariat, Navi Mumbai, India
[3] Homi Bhabha Natl Inst HBNI, Adv Ctr Treatment Res & Educ Canc ACTREC, Tata Mem Ctr, Div Internal Med,Clin Res Ctr, Navi Mumbai, India
关键词
antibody; convalescent; coronavirus; plasma; randomised; therapeutics; BLOOD;
D O I
10.1111/tme.12803
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Despite scientific advances, there is no effective medical therapy for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma therapy in COVID-19. Methods This review was carried out in accordance with Cochrane methodology including risk of bias assessment and grading of the quality of evidence. Only prospective clinical trials randomly assigning COVID-19 patients to convalescent plasma plus standard of care therapy (test arm) versus placebo/standard of care (control arm) were included. Two reviewers independently read each preprint/publication and extracted relevant data from individual studies. Data were pooled using the random-effects model and expressed as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results A total of 13 206 patients from 12 randomised controlled trials were included. There was no significant difference in clinical improvement rate (RR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.98-1.02, p = 0.96) or time to clinical improvement (median difference of 1.08 days with 95% CI ranging from -0.15 to +2.30 days) between convalescent plasma versus placebo/standard of care therapy. The use of convalescent plasma was not associated with significantly reduced risk of death (RR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.65-1.02, p = 0.08). Reassuringly, overall incidence of infusion-related serious adverse events was low (3.25%) and not significantly different (RR = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.93-1.40, p = 0.22) for convalescent plasma transfusion compared to placebo/standard of care therapy. Conclusions There is low to moderate certainty evidence that the addition of convalescent plasma to current standard of care therapy is generally safe but, does not result in any significant clinical benefit or reduction of mortality in COVID-19.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 420
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and Safety of Convalescent Plasma for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Manya Prasad
    Tulika Seth
    Arunmozhimaran Elavarasi
    Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2021, 37 : 347 - 365
  • [2] Efficacy and Safety of Convalescent Plasma for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Prasad, Manya
    Seth, Tulika
    Elavarasi, Arunmozhimaran
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY AND BLOOD TRANSFUSION, 2021, 37 (03) : 347 - 365
  • [3] Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Treatment Using Convalescent Plasma Transfusion: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Lee, Hyun-Jun
    Lee, Jun-Hyeong
    Cho, Yejin
    Le Thi Nhu Ngoc
    Lee, Young-Chul
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (17)
  • [4] Safety of COVID-19 convalescent plasma: A definitive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Franchini, Massimo
    Cruciani, Mario
    Casadevall, Arturo
    Joyner, Michael J.
    Senefeld, Jonathon W.
    Sullivan, David J.
    Zani, Matteo
    Focosi, Daniele
    TRANSFUSION, 2024, 64 (02) : 388 - 399
  • [5] Efficacy and safety of umifenovir for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, Dong
    Yu, He
    Wang, Ting
    Yang, Huan
    Yao, Rong
    Liang, Zongan
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 93 (01) : 481 - 490
  • [6] Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of oseltamivir (Tamiflu) in the treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
    Aliyu, Basiru
    Raji, Yakubu Egigogo
    Chee, Hui-Yee
    Wong, Mui-Yun
    Bin Sekawi, Zamberi
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (12):
  • [7] Herbal Medicine for the Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Ang, Lin
    Song, Eunhye
    Lee, Hye Won
    Lee, Myeong Soo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (05)
  • [8] Efficacy and Safety of Corticosteroid Use in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yuqing Cui
    Yali Sun
    Junyi Sun
    Huoyan Liang
    Xianfei Ding
    Xueyi Sun
    Dong Wang
    Tongwen Sun
    Infectious Diseases and Therapy, 2021, 10 : 2447 - 2463
  • [9] Efficacy and Safety of Tocilizumab for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Hariyanto, Timotius Ivan
    Hardyson, Willie
    Kurniawan, Andree
    DRUG RESEARCH, 2021, 71 (05) : 265 - 274
  • [10] Efficacy and Safety of Corticosteroid Use in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cui, Yuqing
    Sun, Yali
    Sun, Junyi
    Liang, Huoyan
    Ding, Xianfei
    Sun, Xueyi
    Wang, Dong
    Sun, Tongwen
    INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND THERAPY, 2021, 10 (04) : 2447 - 2463