Vascular Complications after Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Rahhab, Zouhair [1 ]
Misier, Karan Ramdat [1 ]
El Faquir, Nahid [1 ]
Kroon, Herbert [1 ]
Ziviello, Francesca [1 ]
Kardys, Isabella [1 ]
Daemen, Joost [1 ]
De Jaegere, Peter [1 ]
Reardon, Michael J. [2 ]
Popma, Jeff [3 ]
Van Mieghem, Nicolas M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Thoraxctr, Dept Cardiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Houston Methodist Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
关键词
TAVI; TAVR; aortic stenosis; femoral; complications;
D O I
10.1080/24748706.2019.1694730
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Vascular complications (VCs) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are associated with impaired outcome. We performed a meta-analysis to determine in-hospital/30-day major VCs rate after transfemoral-TAVI adjudicated by an independent clinical-event-committee, and to compare the major VCs rate with regard to consecutive generations of balloon-expandable and self-expanding platforms, device profile, experience and patient risk-profile. Methods: A systematic, computerized search with predefined criteria was performed in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane on March 27, 2018. The overall pooled proportion of VC was calculated using a random-effects model. Subgroups were examined based on sheath size, STS-score and start-date of inclusion (early (< January 2012); late-phase (>= January 2012) studies). Results: A total of 24 studies with 14308 patients were included. The pooled major VCs rate was 7.71% and was lower in low-profile vs. high-profile device studies (5.51% vs. 8.46%, p = 0.0015). Major VCs rate decreased significantly with transition to newer generation balloon-expandable valves ((Sapien vs. Sapien XT (15.18% vs. 8.48%, p < 0.00001); Sapien XT vs. Sapien 3 (8.48% vs. 4.48%, p = 0.005)) and there was a tendency towards fewer major VCs in EvolutR vs. CoreValve (5.98% vs. 7.97%, p = 0.094). Major VC rate was lower in late-phase vs. early-phase studies (5.82% vs. 7.84%, p = 0.048) and a tendency towards a lower rate was seen in intermediate vs. high-risk studies (7.09% vs. 9.62%, p = 0.059). Conclusion: The pooled rate of independently adjudicated major VCs after transfemoral-TAVI was 7.71%. Experience and device profile are associated with fewer major VCs.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 71
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transfemoral vs Non-transfemoral Access for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Chandrasekhar, Jaya
    Hibbert, Benjamin
    Ruel, Marc
    Lam, Buu-Khanh
    Labinaz, Marino
    Glover, Christopher
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 31 (12) : 1427 - 1438
  • [2] PERCUTANEOUS OR SURGICAL ACCESS IN TRANSFEMORAL TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND UPDATED META-ANALYSIS
    Abdelaziz, Hesham
    Megaly, Michael
    Debski, Maciej
    Rahbi, Hazim
    Kamal, Diaa
    Saad, Marwan
    Wiper, Andrew
    More, Ranjit
    Roberts, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (11) : 1261 - 1261
  • [3] Antiplatelet therapy after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Costa, GoncaloNuno Ferraz
    Costa, Marco
    Goncalves, Lino
    Teixeira, Rogerio
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 60 (05) : 1022 - 1029
  • [4] Transradial vs transfemoral secondary access outcomes in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Radhakrishnan, Shree Lata
    Ho, Kalon K. L.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 12 (11): : 571 - 583
  • [5] Transfemoral versus transapical approach for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of adjusted studies
    Hage, F.
    Harris, A. R.
    Clerc, O.
    Altibi, A.
    Hage, A.
    Hamaya, R.
    Papatheodorou, S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2021, 42 : 1624 - 1624
  • [6] Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Bicuspid Aortic Valve With Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chan, J. S. K.
    Harky, A.
    Singh, S.
    Eriksen, P.
    Tsui, L. H.
    Abdulsalam, A.
    Field, M.
    Nawaytou, O.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 : 34 - 34
  • [7] Subclinical valve thrombosis in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Woldendorp, Kei
    Doyle, Mathew P.
    Black, Deborah
    Ng, Martin
    Keech, Anthony
    Grieve, Stuart M.
    Bannon, Paul G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 162 (05): : 1491 - +
  • [8] Statins and Mortality of Patients After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Yarahmadi, Pourya
    Kabiri, Ali
    Forouzannia, Seyed Mohammad
    Yousefifard, Mahmoud
    [J]. ANGIOLOGY, 2023, 74 (07) : 611 - 623
  • [9] A systematic review and meta-analysis of the cerebrovascular event incidence after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
    Max M. Meertens
    Sascha Macherey
    Sebastiaan Asselberghs
    Samuel Lee
    Jan Hendrik Schipper
    Barend Mees
    Ingo Eitel
    Stephan Baldus
    Christian Frerker
    Tobias Schmidt
    [J]. Clinical Research in Cardiology, 2022, 111 : 843 - 858
  • [10] A systematic review and meta-analysis of the cerebrovascular event incidence after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
    Meertens, Max M.
    Macherey, Sascha
    Asselberghs, Sebastiaan
    Lee, Samuel
    Schipper, Jan Hendrik
    Mees, Barend
    Eitel, Ingo
    Baldus, Stephan
    Frerker, Christian
    Schmidt, Tobias
    [J]. CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 111 (08) : 843 - 858