Comparison of selection based on phenotype, selection index and best linear unbiased prediction using data from a closed broiler line

被引:13
|
作者
Morris, AJ [1 ]
Pollott, GE [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV LONDON WYE COLL,DEPT AGR HORT & ENVIRONM,ASHFORD TN25 5AH,KENT,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00071669708417981
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
1. Selection based on three methods of estimating breeding values, Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUP), selection index (SI), and phenotype (SP) were compared for three traits, juvenile body weight (JW), percentage breast meat yield (BM) and hen-day rate of egg production (EP) using records provided by a commercial broiler breeding company. 2. Product moment correlations were calculated between breeding values estimated by each method and averaged across sexes. A mean correlation of 0.69 was obtained between selection on SP and BLUP for JW. Mean correlations of 0.88 and 0.68 and 0.87 were obtained between SI and BLUP for the traits JW, EP and BM, respectively. 3. A mean estimated genetic response of 77.7% was obtained with SP for JW relative to BLUP in the absence of restrictions on the selection of close relatives. Estimated genetic responses of 90.7%, 66.9% and 88.4% were obtained by SI relative to BLUP for JW, EP and BM, respectively. 4. Applying restrictions on the selection of close relatives resulted in slight decreases in estimated responses but not in the respective ranking of the selection methods. 5. The results indicate that BLUP could protide commercial breeders with increased selection responses compared to index selection, in particular for traits of low heritability and where relatively few animals possess performance records.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 254
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARISON OF INDEX SELECTION AND BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION FOR SIMULATED LAYER POULTRY DATA
    JEYARUBAN, MG
    GIBSON, JP
    GOWE, RS
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 1995, 74 (10) : 1566 - 1576
  • [2] MARKER ASSISTED SELECTION USING BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION
    FERNANDO, RL
    GROSSMAN, M
    [J]. GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 1989, 21 (04) : 467 - 477
  • [3] RESTRICTED BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION AND A SELECTION MODEL
    FAMULA, TR
    [J]. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1984, 67 (04) : 337 - 340
  • [4] SELECTION ON INDIVIDUAL PHENOTYPE AND BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTOR OF BREEDING VALUE IN A CLOSED SWINE HERD
    BELONSKY, GM
    KENNEDY, BW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1988, 66 (05) : 1124 - 1131
  • [5] A UNIFIED PROCEDURE OF COMPUTING RESTRICTED BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION AND RESTRICTED SELECTION INDEX
    LIN, CY
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR TIERZUCHTUNG UND ZUCHTUNGSBIOLOGIE, 1990, 107 (04): : 311 - 315
  • [6] EFFECT OF CULLING ON SELECTION RESPONSE USING PHENOTYPIC SELECTION OR BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION OF BREEDING VALUES IN SMALL, CLOSED HERDS OF SWINE
    KUHLERS, DL
    KENNEDY, BW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1992, 70 (08) : 2338 - 2348
  • [7] Combined selection of progeny in crop breeding using best linear unbiased prediction
    Soriano Viana, Jose Marcelo
    Faria, Vinicius Ribeiro
    Fonseca e Silva, Fabyano
    Vilela de Resende, Marcos Deon
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2012, 92 (03) : 553 - 562
  • [8] Best Linear Unbiased Prediction and Family Selection in Crop Species
    Soriano Viana, Jose Marcelo
    Faria, Vincius Ribeiro
    Fonseca e Silva, Fabyano
    Vilela de Resende, Marcos Deon
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 2011, 51 (06) : 2371 - 2381
  • [9] BEST LINEAR UNBIASED ESTIMATION AND PREDICTION UNDER A SELECTION MODEL
    HENDERSON, CR
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1975, 31 (02) : 423 - 447
  • [10] Use of an index based on best linear unbiased prediction value for the selection of superior papaya lines for multiple traits
    Santana, Josefa Grasiela Silva
    Ramos, Helaine Christine Cancela
    Santa-Catarina, Renato
    Vettorazzi, Julio Cesar Fiorio
    Miranda, Daniel Pereira
    Pirovani, Adriana Azevedo Vimercati
    Poltronieri, Tathianne Pastana de Sousa
    Azevedo, Alinne Oliveira Nunes
    Duarte, Rafaela Pereira
    Bohry, Dieimes
    Pereira, Messias Gonzaga
    [J]. BRAGANTIA, 2022, 81